UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| ¨ | | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
| |
| ¨ | | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| |
| ý | | Definitive Proxy Statement |
| |
| ¨ | | Definitive Additional Materials |
| |
| ¨ | | Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12 |
TriNet Group, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ý | | No fee required. |
| | |
| ¨ | | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
| | | | |
| | 1. | | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| | 2. | | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| | 3. | | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| | 4. | | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| | 5. | | Total fee paid: |
| | |
| ¨ | | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
| | |
| ¨ | | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
| | | | |
| | 1. | | Amount Previously Paid: |
| | 2. | | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
| | 3. | | Filing Party: |
| | 4. | | Date Filed: |
TRINET GROUP, INC.
1100 San Leandro Blvd.,One Park Place, Suite 400600
San Leandro, CA 94577Dublin, California 94568
NOTICE OF 20162021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held On May 26, 201627, 2021
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 20162021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of TRINET GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation. The meetingcorporation, which will be held virtually on Thursday, May 26, 2016, at27, 2021, at 9:00 a.m., local time, at Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport, 1333 Bayshore Highway, Burlingame, California 94010Pacific Time (the "2021 Annual Meeting").
We are holding the 2021 Annual Meeting for the following purposes:purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:
| | |
|
1. | To elect our three nominees for directorfive Class I directors to hold office until the 20192024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; |
| |
2. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers ("Named Executive Officers,Officers" or "NEOs"), as disclosed in this Proxy Statement;accompanying proxy statement; |
| |
3.To indicate, on an advisory basis, the preferred frequency of stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers; |
|
4. To ratify the selection by the Audit Committeeappointment of the Board of Directors of ErnstDeloitte & YoungTouche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;2021; and |
| |
4. | 5.To conduct any other business properly brought before the meeting.meeting or any adjournment or postponements thereof. |
|
These itemsThis year's annual meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of business are more fully described instockholders. You can attend the Proxy Statement accompanying this formal Notice of 20162021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TNET2021, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote online during the meeting, just as you could at an in-person meeting. We believe that a virtual meeting enables expanded access and increased stockholder attendance and participation.
The record date for the 20162021 Annual Meeting is March 31, 2016.2021. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date may vote at the meetingour 2021 Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. Further information regarding voting rights and the matters to be voted upon is presented in the accompanying proxy statement.
On or about April 14, 2021, we expect to mail to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement and annual report. The Notice provides instructions on how to vote via the Internet or by telephone and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials by mail. The accompanying proxy statement and our annual report can be accessed directly
at the following Internet address www.proxyvote.com. You will be asked to enter the sixteen-digit control number located on your Notice or proxy card.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the 2021 Annual Meeting, we urge you to submit your vote via the Internet, telephone or mail as soon as possible to ensure your shares are represented. For additional instructions on voting by telephone or the Internet, please refer to your proxy card. Returning the proxy does not deprive you of your right to attend the 2021 Annual Meeting and to vote your shares at the 2021 Annual Meeting.
We appreciate your continued support of TriNet.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Brady MickelsenSamantha Wellington
Secretary
San Leandro, California
April 15, 2016
|
| |
You are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person.meeting. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, please complete, date, sign and return the proxy mailed to you, or vote over the telephone or the internetInternet as instructed in these materials, as promptly as possible in order to ensure your representation at the meeting. Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still vote in person if you attend the meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder. |
TRINET GROUP, INC.
1100 San Leandro Blvd.,PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TRINET GROUP, INC.
One Park Place, Suite 400600
San Leandro, CA 94577Dublin, California 94568
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE 20162021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THESE PROXY MATERIALS AND VOTING
Why am I receiving these materials?
The Board of Directors of TriNet Group, Inc. (the “Board”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2021 Annual Meeting”), including at any adjournments or postponements of the 2021 Annual Meeting. In this Proxy Statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting (the “Proxy Statement”), “we,” “us,” “our,” the "Company" and “TriNet” refer to TriNet Group, Inc.
Why did I receive a notice regarding the availability of proxy materials on the internet?Internet?
Pursuant toUnder the "notice and access" rules adopted byof the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we have electedare able to provide access to our proxy materials over the internet.Internet. Accordingly, we have sent you a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) because our Board of Directors (the “Board”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 2016our 2021 Annual Meeting, of Stockholders (the “2016 Annual Meeting”), including at any adjournments or postponements of the meeting. All stockholders will have the abilitybe able to access theour proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. InstructionsThe Notice includes instructions on how to access theour proxy materials over the internetInternet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. In this Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”), “we”, “us”, “our” and “TriNet” refercopy.
We expect to TriNet Group, Inc.
We mailedmail the Notice on or about April 15, 2016,14, 2021 to all stockholders of record entitled to vote at the 2016our 2021 Annual Meeting.
Will I receive any other proxy materials by mail?
We may send you a proxy card, along with a second Notice, on or after April 25, 2016.27, 2021.
How do I attendWhere and at what time is the 20162021 Annual Meeting?
The 2016Our 2021 Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, May 26, 2016,27, 2021, at 9:00 a.m., local time,Pacific Time. The 2021 Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders. You can attend the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TNET2021 where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote online. You will not be able to physically attend the 2021 Annual Meeting. We believe that a virtual meeting enables expanded access and increased stockholder attendance and participation.
How many votes do I have?
On each matter to be voted upon, you have one vote for each share of common stock you own as of the close of business on our record date, March 31, 2021.
What matters am I voting on and how many votes are needed to approve each proposal?
You will be able to vote on the four matters listed below at our 2021 Annual Meeting. The table below summarizes the Board’s voting recommendation, the minimum vote needed to approve each proposal, and the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proposal
Number | | Proposal Description | | Vote Required for Approval | | Board's Recommendation | | Effect of
Abstentions | | Effect of Broker Non-Votes |
| 1 | | The election of Katherine August-deWilde, H. Raymond Bingham, Ralph A. Clark, Maria Contreras-Sweet, and Shawn Guertin as Class I directors | | Nominees receiving the most “For” votes | | FOR each Nominee | | None | | None |
| | | | | |
| 2 | | Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers | | “For” votes from the holders of a majority of shares attending the meeting live or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter | | FOR | | Against | | None |
| | | | | |
| 3 | | To indicate, on an advisory basis, the preferred frequency of stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers | | The frequency receiving the highest number of votes from the holders of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter | | EVERY YEAR | | None | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 4 | | Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021 | | “For” votes from the holders of a majority of shares attending the meeting live or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter | | FOR | | Against | | None |
In addition, you may vote on any other business as may properly come before the 2021 Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
How do I vote?
You may either vote “For” all the nominees to the Board or you may “Withhold” your vote for any nominee you specify. You may vote "Every Year," "Every Two Years" or "Every Three Years" on the frequency of the advisory vote on our Named Executive Officers' compensation or abstain from voting. For each of the other matters to be voted on, you may vote “For” or “Against” or abstain from voting.
Why are you holding a virtual annual meeting?
This is the second year that we have implemented a virtual format for our Annual Meeting. Based on our experience at the Hyatt Regency San Francisco Airport, 1333 Bayshore Highway, Burlingame, California 94010. Directions to the 2016 Annual Meeting may be found at www.proxyvote.com. Information on how to vote in person at the 2016 Annual Meeting is discussed below.2020 annual meeting of stockholders, we believe that a virtual meeting will enable expanded access and increased stockholder attendance and participation.
Who can vote at the 20162021 Annual Meeting?
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 31, 2016,2021, will be entitled to vote at the 2016our 2021 Annual Meeting. Beneficial owners can vote their shares live at our 2021 Annual Meeting so long as they obtain a valid proxy from their broker, bank or other agent. On thisthe record date of March 31, 2021, there were 70,718,42365,881,233 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.
Who is a stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Namerecord and how do they vote?
If, on March 31, 2016,2021, your shares were registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., then you are a stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting, we urge you to fill out and return a proxy card or vote by proxy, over the telephone or on the internet as instructed in the below to ensure your vote is counted.
Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Bank
If on March 31, 2016, your shares were held, not in your name, but rather in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, dealer or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and the Notice is being forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered to be the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the 2016 Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or other agent regarding how to vote the shares in your account. You are also invited to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting. However, because you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from your broker or other agent.
What am I voting on?
There are three matters scheduled for a vote at the 2016 Annual Meeting:
Election of three directors;
Advisory approval of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with SEC rules; and
Ratification of selection by the Audit Committee of the Board of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.
What if another matter is properly brought before the meeting?
We know of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the 2016 Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the meeting, it is the intention of the proxyholders named in the accompanying proxy to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment.
How do I vote?
You may either vote “For” all the nominees to the Board or you may “Withhold” your vote for any nominee you specify. For each of the other matters to be voted on, you may vote “For” or “Against” or abstain from voting.
The procedures for voting at the 2016 Annual Meeting are as follows:
Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name
If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote in personlive at the 2016our 2021 Annual Meeting, or by proxy over the telephone, through the internetInternet, or by using a proxy card that you may request or that we may elect to deliver to you at a later time. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the 2016our 2021 Annual Meeting and vote in personlive even if you have already voted by proxy.
If, on March 31, 2021, your shares were not held in your name, but rather in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, or other similar agent, then you are the beneficial owner of those shares and different procedures apply for you. Read the question titled "Who is a beneficial owner and how do they vote?" below.
To vote in person, comeEven if you plan to the 2016attend our 2021 Annual Meeting, at which we will giveplease read this Proxy Statement carefully and vote using one of the following methods if you are a ballot upon request.stockholder of record:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and send by free post | In the U.S. or Canada dial toll free 24/7 1-800-690-6903 | Visit 24/7 www.proxyvote.com | Vote live at the 2021
Annual Meeting | Scan your unique QR code on your proxy card 24/7 to vote with your mobile device |
•To vote using the proxy card, simply complete, sign and date the proxy card that may be delivered and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If you return your signed proxy card is received before the 2016our 2021 Annual Meeting, your proxyholder (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares as you direct.
•To vote over the telephone, dial toll-free 1-800-690-6903 using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the Notice. Your telephone vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 25, 201626, 2021, to be counted.
•To vote through the internet, go toto www.proxyvote.com to complete an electronic proxy card. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the Notice. Your internetInternet vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern TimeTime on May 25, 201626, 2021, to be counted. Internet proxy voting may be provided to allow you to vote your shares online, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions.
Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered•To vote live, attend our 2021 Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TNET2021, where you may vote and submit questions during the meeting (have your Notice or proxy card in hand when you visit the Name of Broker or Bankwebsite). Even if you plan to attend the 2021 Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also vote by proxy so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the 2021 Annual Meeting.
Who is a beneficial owner and how do they vote?
If, on March 31, 2021, your shares were not held in your name, but rather in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, or other similar agent, then you are athe beneficial owner of shares registeredheld in “street name” and the name of yourNotice will be forwarded to you by that broker, bank or agent rather than by TriNet. The broker, bank or other agent you should have received a Notice containingholding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting instructions from that organization rather than from TriNet.at the 2021 Annual Meeting. Simply follow the voting instructions in the Notice your broker, bank or other agent sends to you to ensure that your vote is counted.
If your shares were instead registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., then you are a stockholder of record with respect to those shares and different procedures apply for you. Read the question titled "Who is a stockholder of record and how do they vote?" above.
Even if you plan to attend our 2021 Annual Meeting, please read this Proxy Statement carefully and vote using one of the following methods if you are a beneficial owner:
| | | | | |
| |
Vote live at our 2021 Annual Meeting by obtaining a legal
proxy from your broker, bank or other agent | Follow the voting instructions in the Notice you received from your broker, bank or other agent |
•To vote in personlive at the 20162021 Annual Meeting, you must obtain a validlegal proxy from your broker, bank or other agent. Follow
•To vote by any other means, you must follow the instructions in the Notice you receive from your broker, bank or bank included with theseother agent. These instructions can vary from agent to agent.
What is the quorum requirement?
A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid annual meeting. A quorum will be present if stockholders holding a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote attend the 2021 Annual Meeting live or are represented by proxy. On the record date, March 31, 2021, there were 65,881,233 shares outstanding and entitled to vote. Thus, the holders of 32,940,617 shares must attend the 2021 Annual Meeting live or be presented by proxy materials, or contactat our 2021 Annual Meeting to have a quorum. Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy, if a valid proxy is submitted on your behalf by your broker, bank or bankother agent, or if you vote live at our 2021 Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, the Chair of the meeting or the holders of a majority of shares attending the meeting live or represented by proxy may adjourn the 2021 Annual Meeting to request a proxy form.
|
| | | | |
Internet proxy voting may be provided to allow you to vote your shares online, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions. However, please be aware that you must bear any costs associated with your internet access, such as usage charges from internet access providers and telephone companies. |
How many votes do I have?
On each matter to be voted upon, you have one vote for each share of common stock you own as of March 31, 2016.another date.
What happens if I do not vote?
Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name
If you are a stockholder of record and do not vote either by completing your proxy card, by telephone, through the internetInternet or in person at the 2016live by attending our 2021 Annual Meeting, your shares will not be voted.
Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered invoted or be counted as present at the Name2021 Annual Meeting for the purposes of Broker or Bankestablishing a quorum.
If you are a beneficial owner and do not instruct your broker, bank, or other agent how to vote your shares, the question of whether your broker, bank or nomineeagent will still be able to vote your shares depends on whethercertain matters. For the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) deems the particular proposal to be a “routine” matter. Brokers and nominees can use their discretion to vote “uninstructed” shares with respect to matters that are considered to be “routine,” but not with respect to “non-routine” matters. Under the rules and interpretations of the NYSE, “non-routine” matters are matters that may substantially affect the rights or privileges of stockholders, such as mergers, stockholder proposals, elections of directors (even if not contested), executive compensation (including any advisory stockholder votes on executive compensation and on the frequency of stockholder votes on executive compensation), and certain corporate governance proposals, even if management-supported. Accordingly,2021 Annual Meeting, your broker, bank or nomineeagent may not vote your shares on ProposalsProposal 1 (election of directors), Proposal 2 (advisory approval of executive compensation), or 2 without your instructions,Proposal 3 (advisory approval of annual advisory votes on named executive compensation), but may vote your shares on Proposal 3.4 (ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP).
What are “broker non-votes”?
When a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” does not give instructions to the broker or nominee holding the shares as to how to vote on matters deemed by the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") to be “non-routine,” the broker or nominee cannot vote the shares. These unvoted shares are counted as “broker non-votes.” For the 2021 Annual Meeting, Proposal 4 (ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP) is the sole routine matter. Your broker, bank or agent will not have discretion to vote on Proposal 1 (election of directors), Proposal 2 (advisory approval of executive compensation), or Proposal 3 (advisory approval of annual advisory votes on Named Executive Officer compensation) absent direction from you, as they are considered "non-routine" matters.
What if I return a proxy card or otherwise vote but do not make specific choices?
If you return a signed and dated proxy card or otherwise vote without marking voting selections, your shares will be voted, as applicable, “For” the election of all threefive nominees for director, “For” the advisory approval of executive compensation, for "Every Year" as the preferred frequency of advisory votes on Named Executive Officer compensation, and “For” ratification of selection by the Audit Committeeappointment of the Board of ErnstDeloitte & YoungTouche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for itsthe fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.2021. If any other matter is properly presented at the meeting, your proxyholder will vote your shares using histheir best judgment.
What if another matter is properly brought before the meeting?
We know of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at our 2021 Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the meeting, it is the intention of the proxyholders named in the accompanying proxy to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment.
Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?
We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies.proxies for our 2021 Annual Meeting. In addition to these proxy materials, members of theour Board and our employees also may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone, or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We also may also reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.
What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice?
If you receive more than one Notice, your shares may be registered in more than one name or in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions on each of the Notices you receive to ensure that all of your shares are voted.
Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?
Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name
Yes. You can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the meeting. If you are the record holder of your shares, you may revoke your proxy in any one of the following ways:
•you may submit another properly completed proxy card with a later date;
•you may grant a subsequent proxy by telephone or through the internet;Internet using the procedures outlined above;
•you may send a timely written notice that you are revoking your proxy to our Secretary at 1100 San Leandro Blvd.,One Park Place, Suite 400, San Leandro,600, Dublin, California 94577;94568; or
•you may attend the 20162021 Annual Meeting and vote in person (simply attending the meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy).live.
Your most current proxy card or telephone or internetInternet proxy isat the time of the 2021 Annual Meeting will be the one that is counted.counted.
Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or BankOther Agent
Yes. If your shares are held by your broker, bank or bank as a nominee orother agent, you should follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or bank.agent for changing or revoking your vote. You cannot change or revoke the vote made by your broker, bank or agent by attending our 2021 Annual Meeting, unless you have obtained a legal proxy from the broker, bank or agent that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares.
When are stockholder proposals due for the 20172022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders?
To be considered for inclusion in our 20172022 proxy materials, your proposal (including a director nomination) must be submitted in writing by December 16, 2016,15, 2021 to our Secretary at 1100 San Leandro Blvd.,One Park Place, Suite 400, San Leandro,600, Dublin, California 94577,94568, and must comply with all applicable requirements of Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); provided, however, that if our 20172022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is held before April 26, 2017,27, 2022, or after June 25, 2017,26, 2022, then the deadline is a reasonable amount of time prior to the date we begin to print and mail our proxy statement for the 20172022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If you wish to submit a proposal (including a director nomination) that is not to be included in our 20172022 proxy materials, the proposal must be received by our Secretary not earlier than the close of business on January 26, 2017, but27, 2022, and not later than the close of business on February 25, 2017;26, 2022; provided, however, that if our 20172022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is held before April 26, 2017,27, 2022, or after June 25, 2017,26, 2022, then the proposal must be received not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such
meeting is first made. You are also advised to review our bylaws,Bylaws, which contain additional requirements about advance notice of stockholder proposals and director nominations.
What are “broker non-votes”?
As discussed above, when a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” does not give instructions to the broker or nominee holding the shares as to how to vote on matters deemed by the NYSE to be “non-routine,” the broker or nominee cannot vote the shares. These unvoted shares are counted as “broker non-votes.”
How many votes are needed to approve each proposal?
The following table summarizes the minimum vote needed to approve each proposal and the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Proposal
Number | | Proposal Description | | Vote Required for Approval | | Effect of
Abstentions | | Effect of
Broker
Non-Votes |
1 | | Election of directors | | Nominees receiving the most “For” votes | | No effect | | None |
| | | | |
2 | | Advisory approval of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers | | “For” votes from the holders of a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter | | Against | | None |
| | | | |
3 | | Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 | | “For” votes from the holders of a majority of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter | | Against | �� | None |
What is the quorum requirement?
A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present if stockholders holding at a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote are present at the meeting in person or represented by proxy. On the record date, there were 70,718,423 shares outstanding and entitled to vote. Thus, the holders of 35,359,212 shares must be present in person or represented by proxy at the 2016 Annual Meeting to have a quorum.
Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy (or one is submitted on your behalf by your broker, bank or other nominee) or if you vote in person at the 2016 Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, the holders of a majority of shares present at the meeting in person or represented by proxy may adjourn the 2016 Annual Meeting to another date.
How can I find out the results of the voting at the 20162021 Annual Meeting?
Preliminary voting results will be announced at the 2016our 2021 Annual Meeting. In addition, final voting results will be published in a current reportCurrent Report on Form 8-K that we expect to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within four business days after the 20162021 Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to file a Form 8-K within four business days after the meeting, we intend to file a Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and, within four business days after the final results are known to us, file an additional Form 8-K to publish the final results.
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
TheOur Board is divided into three classes. Each class hasclasses, each with a three-year term. Vacancies on the Board may be filled only by persons elected by a majority of the remaining directors. A director elected by the Board to fill a vacancy in a class, including vacancies created by an increase in the number of directors, shall serve for the remainder of the full term of that class and until the director’stheir successor is duly elected and qualified.
The
As of the date of filing of this Proxy Statement, our Board presently has ninetwelve members. ThereKatherine August-deWilde, H. Raymond Bingham, Ralph A. Clark, Maria Contreras-Sweet, and Shawn Guertin are threeClass I directors in the class whose term of office expires in 2016.at the 2021 Annual Meeting. Each of the nomineesdirectors listed below is currently a member of our Board who has been recommended for reelection by theour Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and has been nominated for reelection by theour Board. IfPursuant to our Bylaws, if elected at the 20162021 Annual Meeting, each of these nominees would serve until the 2019our 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his or her successor hastheir successors have been duly elected and qualified, or ifa director’s service may cease sooner untilin the director’sevent of such director's death, resignation or removal. Directors are
Our nominees will be elected by a plurality of the votes of the holders of shares present in personattending the 2021 Annual Meeting, or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on the election of directors.directors at our 2021 Annual Meeting. This means that the threefive nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes, even if less than a majority of the shares outstanding on the record date, will be elected. Shares represented by executed proxies will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of the threefive nominees named below. If any nominee becomes unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence,for any reason, shares that would have been voted for that nominee will instead will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee proposed by the Board. Each person nominated for election has agreed to serve if elected. We have no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve.
It is our policy to invite and encourage directors and nominees for director to attend theeach of our annual meetingmeetings of stockholders. In 2015, seven2020, all of eightthe directors then in office attended the 2015our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
The following is a brief biography of each nominee for election at our 2021 Annual Meeting and each director whose term will continue after the 2016our 2021 Annual Meeting.
Nominees for Election for a Three-year Term Expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting
Martin Babinec, 61, founded TriNet in 1988 and has served on the Board since that time, acting as Chairman until December 2009. From 1988 until May 2008, he also served as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Babinec also founded and serves as Chairman of Upstate Venture Connect and co-founded and serves as Chairman of the StartFast Venture Accelerator and IntroNet Corporation. Prior to founding TriNet, Mr. Babinec served in senior human resources management positions at the Navy Exchange, an international retailer. Mr. Babinec holds a B.S. in Business Administration from Shippensburg University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Babinec is qualified to serve on the Board based on his significant business experience, both inside and outside our industry, and because his role as our founder and former Chief Executive Officer brings unique insight to the Board. | | | | | |
Director since 2013 Independent | Katherine August-deWilde Compensation Committee (Chair) Katherine August-deWilde, age 73, has been a member of our Board since October 2013. Ms. August-deWilde is currently Vice Chair and a director of First Republic Bank, a commercial bank specializing in private banking, business banking and wealth management, since January 2016 and served as the President of First Republic Bank from 2007 to 2015. Ms. August-deWilde has served in various roles at First Republic Bank since 1985, including as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Ms. August-deWilde also has served on the board of directors of First Republic Bank since 1988, Eventbrite, Inc. since February 2016, and SunRun, Inc. since January 2016. She is a member of the Catalyst Corporate Board Resource. Ms. August-deWilde holds a B.A. from Goucher College and an M.B.A. from Stanford University Graduate School of Business. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Ms. August-deWilde is qualified to serve on our Board based on her experience as a corporate executive, her financial expertise, and her service on the boards of directors of other public companies. |
| | | | | |
Director since 2008 Independent | H. Raymond Bingham Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chair) Compensation Committee (Member) H. Raymond Bingham, age 75, has been a member of our Board since July 2008 and served as the Chair of our Board from January 2010 to May 2018. He is a partner of Canyon Bridge Capital Partners, a global private equity buyout firm, and has served as Executive Chairman of Imagination Technologies since November 2016. From 2015 to 2016, he was an Advisory Director of Riverwood Capital Management, a private equity firm that invests in high-growth technology companies. From January 2010 to December 2015, Mr. Bingham was an Advisory Director of General Atlantic, a global growth equity firm, and served as a Managing Director from September 2006 to December 2009. Previously, Mr. Bingham served on the board of directors of Cypress Semiconductor from March 2015 to June 2017 and as Executive Chairman from August 2016 to June 2017. He also previously served on the board of directors of Flextronics International Ltd. from October 2005 to June 2017, Oracle Corporation from November 2002 to March 2017, DHI Group, Inc. from July 2009 to April 2015, Spansion, Inc. from May 2010 to March 2015, Fusion-io, Inc. from February 2011 to July 2014, and STMicroelectronics from April 2007 to April 2013. Mr. Bingham holds a B.S. in Economics from Weber State University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Additionally, he was awarded an Honorary Doctorate of Humanities from Weber State University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Bingham is qualified to serve on our Board based on his broad and extensive experience serving in management roles at technology companies, including as chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as well as his significant service on the board of directors of other publicly traded companies, and his extensive knowledge and experience managing portfolio companies both within and outside our industry. |
Paul Chamberlain, 52, has been a member of the Board since December 2015. Mr. Chamberlain currently operates his own strategic and financial advisory firm, PEC Ventures. Prior to starting PEC Ventures in early 2015, Mr. Chamberlain worked at Morgan Stanley for 26 years, most recently as Managing Director and Co-Head of Global Technology Banking, as well as a member of the Investment Banking Division’s Operating Committee. He spent the majority of his Morgan Stanley career in the firm’s Menlo Park, California office. In addition to his role overseeing its global technology banking group, he also led Morgan Stanley account teams on hundreds of financing and strategic transactions for its technology clients. Mr. Chamberlain also serves as Chairman of the Strategic Advisory Committee of JobTrain, the Menlo Park, California-based vocational and life skills training group focused on the neediest in the Silicon Valley community, and he served on its board for over ten years. He earned a B.A. in History, magna cum laude, from Princeton University in 1985 and received an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School in 1989. Mr. Chamberlain regularly lectures in Economics and Entrepreneurial Management classes at Stanford University and Princeton University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Chamberlain is qualified to serve on the Board based on his strategic and financial expertise and his past experience as a Managing Director of Morgan Stanley.
Wayne B. Lowell, 60, has been a member of the Board since 2009. Since early 2012, Mr. Lowell has been serving as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Senior Whole Health Holdings, Inc., a health insurance company focused on providing health insurance coverage to senior citizens. From October 2007 to July 2008, Mr. Lowell served as Chief Executive Officer of Wellmed Medical Management, Inc., a physician healthcare services company. From 1998 to September 2007 and July 2008 to June 2012, he served as President of Jonchra Associates, LLC, which provides strategic, operating and financial advice to senior management of private-equity funded and publicly held entities. From 1986 to 1998, he worked for PacifiCare Health Systems (now part of United Healthcare). At PacifiCare, he held various positions of increasing authority, ultimately serving as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer. From January 2010 to June 2013, Mr. Lowell served on the board of directors of Addus Homecare Corp., and from August 2007 to March 2011, he served on the board of directors of Insight Health Services Holdings
| | | | | |
Director since 2021 Independent | Ralph A. Clark Ralph Clark, age 62, serves as the President and CEO of ShotSpotter, Inc., a publicly traded (NASDAQ SSTI) SaaS based acoustic surveillance and precision policing solutions company. The company is focused on law enforcement agencies and security personnel globally and includes over 100 municipalities and their respective LE agencies as clients. Mr. Clark joined ShotSpotter in 2010 and led the business model and technology transformation resulting in ShotSpotter's category leading platform expansion, sustained revenue growth and recent full year GAAP profitability. Mr. Clark successfully orchestrated ShotSpotter's initial public offering in 2017 bringing on high quality institutional investor firms such as Gilder Gagnon and Federated as public market institutional investors. The company's market capitalization has grown since going public and is recognized as a market pioneer and leader in precision policing solutions. Prior to joining ShotSpotter, Mr. Clark was the CEO of GuardianEdge Technologies, a leading end-point data protection company that he joined in 2005 which was acquired by Symantec in 2010 for approximately $100 million. Mr. Clark is proud to have started his career as an IBM large systems marketing representative in the early 1980's working in Seattle with primary responsibility for large systems sales to Boeing Computer Services. After business school, Mr. Clark spent three years in investment banking with Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch prior to moving back to his hometown in Oakland, California to re-pursue a career in leading high growth technology companies. Mr. Clark holds a B.S. in Economics from University of the Pacific and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Clark is qualified to serve on our Board based on his significant management experience in small and medium sized businesses, his current role as the chief executive officer of a publicly traded company and his multiple experiences as a TriNet client. |
Corp. Mr. Lowell holds a B.S. in accounting from the University of Maryland and an M.B.A. from the University of California at Irvine. Mr. Lowell is a Certified Public Accountant. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Lowell is qualified to serve on the Board based on his years of experience in the health care industry and his past experience as a chief financial officer. | | | | | |
Director since 2020 Independent | Maria Contreras-Sweet Risk Committee (Member) Maria Contreras-Sweet, 65, has been a director since November 2020. In October 2017, she became the Managing Member of both Contreras Sweet Companies, LLC, a marketing and research solutions company, and Rockway Equity Partners, LLC, a private-equity firm that invests in small and mid-size companies. From April 2014 through January 2017, she served as the 24th Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration and as a member of President Obama’s cabinet where she managed the world’s largest seed fund and the largest middle market fund of funds, as well as a $120 billion loan portfolio. In addition, Ms. Contreras-Sweet led a major initiative to bring the Small Business Administration ("SBA") into the digital age and expand into broader domestic and global markets. At the time, SBA reached historic levels in lending and contracting for small businesses. Prior, Ms. Contreras-Sweet was a founder of ProAmerica Bank where she served as Executive Chairwoman from 2006 to 2014. The bank served the small and middle market. She was Co-Founder and Managing Partner of Fortius Holdings from 2004 to 2006. Prior to that, she served as the California cabinet Secretary of the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency from 1999 to 2003 where she oversaw 42,000 employees with a $14 billion budget. While there she led in the creation of the Department of Managed Healthcare, the state's HMO regulator, and reached new levels of partnering with small businesses on California’s multi-billion dollar infrastructure program. She is a director of Sempra Energy, Regional Management Corporation and on the nonprofit boards of the Bipartisan Policy Center, Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall and is a distinguished fellow of the Larta Institute. Prior, she served on the board of directors of Blue Cross of California and as a Founding Director of The California Endowment, a healthcare philanthropy. Ms. Contreras-Sweet has been bestowed with numerous Honorary Doctorates including from Tufts University, Whittier College and California State University, Los Angeles. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Ms. Contreras-Sweet possesses extensive knowledge and executive experience in state and federal government, corporate, entrepreneurial and nonprofit sectors. She brings a strong understanding of banking, corporate governance, healthcare, and global innovation, extensive experience with small and medium-sized enterprises, and deep familiarity with state and federal regulatory bodies which makes her a valuable contributor to the Board. |
| | | | | |
Director since 2020 Independent | Shawn Guertin Risk Committee (Chair) Audit Committee (Member) Shawn Guertin, age 57, has been a member of our Board since January 2020. While at Aetna, Inc., Mr. Guertin served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Enterprise Risk Officer from January 2014 to May 2019 and as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Enterprise Risk Officer from February 2013 to January 2014, where he was responsible for overseeing a plethora of finance related duties, mergers and acquisitions and risk management. Prior to these roles, while at Aetna, Inc., he served as the Head of Business Segment Finance from April 2011 to February 2013. Prior to joining Aetna, Inc., from 2010 to 2011, he served as a consultant to Coventry Health Care. Prior to this role, while at Coventry HealthCare, from 2005 to 2009, he served as a Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and, from 1998 to 2004, as Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary. In September 2020, Mr. Guertin joined the board of directors of Da Vita. Mr. Guertin holds a B.A. from Boston University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Guertin is qualified to serve on our Board based on his significant management experience in the healthcare industry and his experience as a chief financial officer and chief enterprise risk officer of a public company. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE IN FAVOR OF EACH NAMED NOMINEE.NOMINEE
Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2017Our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Burton M. Goldfield, 60, joined TriNet in May 2008 succeeding Martin Babinec, TriNet's founder, as Chief Executive Officer, | | | | | |
Director since 1988 Independent | Martin Babinec Martin Babinec, age 66, founded TriNet in 1988 and has served on our Board since that time, serving as Chair until December 2009. From 1988 until May 2008, he also served as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Babinec founded and serves as Managing Director of UpVentures Capital, an early-stage investor; co-founded and is a member of the Board since that time. From 2006 to 2008, Mr. Goldfield was Chief Executive Officer of Ketera Technologies, Inc., a provider of on-demand Software-as-a-Service management solutions. From 2004 to 2006, he was the Senior Vice President of Worldwide Field Operations at Hyperion Solutions Corporation, a business performance management software company, which was acquired by Oracle Corporation. Earlier, he was with Rational Software Corporation for 13 years in a variety of management capacities, and subsequently Vice President of Worldwide Sales for IBM Corporation, Rational Software division upon the acquisition of Rational by IBM. Mr. Goldfield also serves on the board of directors of DHI Group, Inc. Mr. Goldfield holds a B.S. in biomedical engineering from Syracuse University and an M.B.A. from Villanova University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Goldfield is qualified to serve on the management committee of Rock City Development LLC; founded and serves as Chair of Upstate Venture Connect and Entrepreneurs Across Borders, both of which are entrepreneur-led non-profits; and UpMobility, a family foundation. Mr. Babinec holds a B.S. in Business Administration from Shippensburg University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Babinec is qualified to serve on our Board based on his significant business experience, both inside and outside our industry, and because his role as our founder and former Chief Executive Officer brings unique insight to the Board. |
| | | | | |
Director since 2015 Independent | Paul Chamberlain Audit Committee (Member) Paul Chamberlain, age 57, has been a member of our Board since December 2015. Mr. Chamberlain currently operates his own strategic and financial advisory firm, PEC Ventures. Prior to starting PEC Ventures in January 2015, he worked at Morgan Stanley, a multinational investment bank and financial services company, for 26 years, most recently as Managing Director and Co-Head of Global Technology Banking. Mr. Chamberlain has served on the board of directors of Veeva Systems, Inc. since December 2015 and ServiceNow, Inc. since October 2016. He also has worked as a visiting professor and adjunct professor at Princeton University’s Keller Center for Entrepreneurial Studies and Santa Clara University’s Leavey School of Business, respectively. Mr. Chamberlain chairs the Strategic Advisory Committee of JobTrain, the Menlo Park, California-based vocational and life skills training group focused on the neediest in the Silicon Valley community. He holds a B.A. in History, magna cum laude, from Princeton University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Chamberlain is qualified to serve on our Board based on his strategic and financial expertise and his past experience as a Managing Director of Morgan Stanley. |
| |
Director since 2009 Independent | Wayne B. Lowell Audit Committee (Chair) Risk Committee (Member) Wayne B. Lowell, age 65, has been a member of our Board since August 2009. From March 2012 until November 2017, Mr. Lowell served as Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Senior Whole Health Holdings, Inc., a health insurance company focused on providing health insurance coverage to senior citizens. From 1998 to 2012, he served as President of Jonchra Associates, LLC, which provided strategic, operating and financial advice to senior management of private-equity funded and publicly held entities. Earlier, he worked for PacifiCare Health Systems, which was a Fortune 500 healthcare company, where he held various positions of increasing authority, ultimately serving as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer. Mr. Lowell served on the board of directors of Addus Homecare Corporation, from January 2010 to June 2013. Mr. Lowell holds a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Maryland and an M.B.A. from the University of California, Irvine. Mr. Lowell is a Certified Public Accountant. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Lowell is qualified to serve on our Board based on his years of experience in the health care industry and his past experience as a chief financial officer. |
David C. Hodgson, 59, has been a member of the Board since 2005 and is a Managing Director of General Atlantic LLC. He joined General Atlantic in 1982, helped found their partnership, and has over 30 years of experience identifying and assisting portfolio companies worldwide in all areas of their development. Mr. Hodgson serves on the boards of directors of a number of public and private companies including Amherst Pierpont Securities, Alignment Healthcare and Hyperion Insurance Group. Mr. Hodgson is chairman of the boards of trustees of Johns Hopkins Medicine and Johns Hopkins Hospital System. He is chairman of the Manhattan Theatre Club and Echoing Green. He also serves as a trustee of Dartmouth College and Johns Hopkins University. Mr. Hodgson holds an A.B. in Mathematics and Social Sciences from Dartmouth College and a M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Hodgson is qualified to serve on the Board based on his experience as a member of the boards of directors of a number of public and private companies and his experience as a Managing Director of General Atlantic.
John H. Kispert, 52, has been a member of the Board since May 2014. Since March 2016, Mr. Kispert has served as Managing Partner of Black Diamond Ventures. From February 2009 until March 2015, Mr. Kispert served as President and Chief Executive Officer and on the board of directors of Spansion, Inc. From 1995 through January 2009, Mr. Kispert served in a number of finance and operational roles at KLA-Tencor Corporation, a supplier of semiconductor manufacturing process control and yield management solutions, including serving as President and Chief Operations Officer from January 2006 to January 2009 and also serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from March 2000 to December 2005. Mr. Kispert has also served as a director of Extreme Networks, Inc., a network hardware company, since May 2009, a director of Gigamon Inc., a provider of traffic visibility solutions, since December 2013, and as a director of Cypress Semiconductor, Inc. since March 2015. Mr. Kispert holds a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of California, Los Angeles and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from Grinnell College. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Kispert is qualified to serve on the Board based on his experience as a director, chief executive officer and chief financial officer of public companies.
Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2018Our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Katherine August-deWilde, 68, has been a member of the Board since October 2013. Ms. August-deWilde is currently vice chair of First Republic Bank, a commercial bank specializing in private banking, business banking and wealth management and served as the President of First Republic Bank from 2007 to 2015. Ms. August-deWilde has served in various roles at First Republic Bank since 1985, including as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining First Republic Bank, Ms. August-deWilde served as Chief Financial Officer at PMI Mortgage Insurance Co. and as a consultant for McKinsey & Company. Ms. August-deWilde also serves on the board of directors of other public companies, in addition to TriNet Group, Inc., including First Republic Bank and Sunrun, Inc. She also serves on private company boards of Equilar, Inc. and Eventbrite. She is a member of the Advisory Council of the Stanford University Graduate School of Business, the Advisory Council of the Stanford Center on Longevity, and the Catalyst Corporate Board Resource. Ms. August-deWilde holds a B.A. from Goucher College and an M.B.A. from Stanford University Graduate School of Business. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Ms. August-deWilde is qualified to serve on the Board based on her experience as a corporate executive, her financial expertise, and her service on the boards of directors of other public boards. | | | | | |
Director since 2017 Independent | Michael J. Angelakis Compensation Committee (Member) Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Member) Michael J. Angelakis, age 56, has been a member of our Board since February 2017. Mr. Angelakis has served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Atairos Management, L.P., an independent, private investment firm, since August 2015. Mr. Angelakis also serves as a Senior Advisor to the Executive Management Committee of Comcast Corporation, a leading media and telecommunications company, since July 2015. Prior to founding Atairos, he served as Comcast Corporation’s Vice Chair from March 2007 to October 2015 and Chief Financial Officer from March 2007 to July 2015. Mr. Angelakis also serves on the board of directors of ExxonMobil since March 2021 and of Groupon, Inc. since April 2016. He previously served on the board of directors of Hewlett Packard Enterprises from October 2015 to March 2020 and Duke Energy Corporation from October 2015 to August 2017, as the Chairman of the Board for the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia from October 2015 to August 2017, and as a Trustee of Babson College. Mr. Angelakis was elected as a director of TriNet pursuant to the terms of the Stockholder Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2016, between TriNet and AGI-T, L.P., an affiliate of Atairos Group, Inc. Mr. Angelakis holds a B.S. from Babson College and is a graduate of the O/P Management Program at Harvard Business School. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Angelakis is qualified to serve on the Board based on his extensive investment, financial and managerial experience and leadership gained through his senior management roles in the media and telecommunications industries, including as the chief financial officer of a public company, as well as experience as a director of other public companies. |
7 | | | | | |
Director since 2008 President and Chief Executive Officer | Burton M. Goldfield Burton M. Goldfield, age 65, joined TriNet as Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board in May 2008. Prior to joining TriNet, Mr. Goldfield was Chief Executive Officer at Ketera Technologies, a SaaS provider to Fortune 2000 companies. Before that, Mr. Goldfield served as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations at Hyperion Solutions Corporation, a software company, and Vice President of Worldwide Sales for IBM Corporation’s multinational information technology company, Rational Software division. Mr. Goldfield also previously served on the board of directors of DHI Group, Inc. from December 2014 to May 2019. Mr. Goldfield holds a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Syracuse University and an M.B.A. from Villanova University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Goldfield is qualified to serve on our Board based on his operational and strategic expertise from his previous executive positions with other large companies, as well as his past experience as a director of another public company. |
H. Raymond Bingham, 70, has been a member of the Board since July 2008 and has served as our Chairman of the Board since January 2010. He is an Advisory Director of Riverwood Capital Management, a private equity firm that invests in high-growth technology companies. From 2010 to 2015, Mr. Bingham was an Advisory Director of General Atlantic LLC and served as a Managing Director from September 2006 to December 2010. He was Executive Chairman of the board of directors of Cadence Design Systems, Inc., a supplier of electronic design automation software and services, from May 2004 to July 2005, and served on the board of directors of Cadence from November 1997 to July 2005. Prior to his role as Executive Chairman, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cadence from April 1999 to May 2004 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from April 1993 to April 1999. Mr. Bingham also serves as a director of Flextronics International Ltd., Oracle Corporation and Cypress Semiconductor, Inc. Mr. Bingham holds a B.S. in Economics from Weber State University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Additionally, he was awarded an Honorary Doctorate of Humanities from Weber State University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Bingham is qualified to serve on the Board based on his broad and extensive experience serving in management roles at technology companies, including as chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as well as his significant service on the board of directors of other publicly traded companies and his extensive knowledge and experience managing portfolio companies both within and outside our industry.
Kenneth Goldman, 66, has been a member of the Board since August 2009. Since October 2012, Mr. Goldman has served as the Chief Financial Officer of Yahoo! Inc., an internet services company. Prior to joining Yahoo!, Mr. Goldman served as Chief Financial Officer of Fortinet, Inc., a provider of unified threat management solutions, from September 2007 to October 2012. From November 2006 to August 2007, Mr. Goldman served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dexterra, Inc., a provider of mobile enterprise software. From August 2000 until March 2006, Mr. Goldman served as Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officer of Siebel Systems, Inc., a supplier of customer software solutions and services, which was acquired by Oracle Corporation in January 2006. Mr. Goldman was appointed in January 2015 to a three-year term to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s (PCAOB’s) Standing Advisory Group (SAG), an organization that provides advice and insight on the need to formulate new accounting standards or change existing standards. Mr. Goldman serves on the board of directors of GoPro, Inc., NXP Semiconductors N.V. and Yahoo! Japan. Mr. Goldman is also a Trustee Emeritus on the board of trustees of Cornell University. Mr. Goldman holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Goldman is qualified to serve on the Board based on his significant experience as a chief financial officer of public companies.
| | | | | |
Director since 2005 Independent | David C. Hodgson Board of Directors (Chair) Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Member) David C. Hodgson, age 64, has been a member of our Board since June 2005 and has served as the Chair of our Board since May 2018. Mr. Hodgson is Vice Chairman and a Managing Director of General Atlantic, a global growth private equity firm. He joined General Atlantic in 1982, helped found their partnership, and has over 35 years of experience identifying and assisting portfolio companies worldwide in all areas of their development. Mr. Hodgson is former Chair and current member of the Board of Trustees of Johns Hopkins Medicine. He serves on the board of directors of Johns Hopkins HealthCare and Johns Hopkins Medicine International. He is Chair of the Manhattan Theatre Club, serves on the President's Leadership Council of the Dartmouth College Board of Trustees, and is a member of the Advisory Council at Stanford Graduate School of Business. Mr. Hodgson is Chairman Emeritus of the board of Echoing Green and is Trustee Emeritus of Johns Hopkins University. Previously, Mr. Hodgson served on the board of directors of DHI Group, Inc. from August 2005 to May 2014. Mr. Hodgson holds an A.B. in Mathematics and Social Sciences from Dartmouth College and an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Hodgson is qualified to serve on our Board based on his experience as a member of the boards of directors of a number of public and private companies and his experience assisting companies in their development as a Managing Director of General Atlantic. |
| | | | | | |
Director since 2020 Independent | Jacqueline Kosecoff Compensation Committee (Member) Jacqueline Kosecoff, age 71, has been a member of our Board since January 2020. Since March 2012, Dr. Kosecoff has been a Managing Partner of Moriah Partners, where she works to identify, select, mentor and manage health services and IT companies, and a Senior Advisor of Warburg Pincus, a private equity investing firm. From 2005 to 2012, Dr. Kosecoff was a senior executive inside UnitedHealth Group-PacifiCare. Dr. Kosecoff joined UnitedHealth Group as part of its acquisition of PacifiCare Health Systems in 2005 and took responsibility for, among other areas, the Medicare Part D business and the consumer health product division serving seniors. From 2002 to 2005, at PacifiCare Health Systems, Dr. Kosecoff served as Executive Vice President with responsibility for various business segments. Dr. Kosecoff served as Chief Executive Officer of Prescription Solutions (now known as OptumRx) from 2006 to 2011. From 1998 to 2002, Dr. Kosecoff was founder, President and Chief Operating Officer of Protocare, a firm whose lines of business included the clinical development of drugs, devices, biopharmaceutical and nutritional products, and health services consulting. Dr. Kosecoff served as Professor of Medicine and Public Health at the University of California, Los Angeles from 1975 to 2006. Dr. Kosecoff has also served on the board of directors of GoodRx since May 2016 (company went public in September 2020), Houlihan Lokey since June 2016, Sealed Air Corporation since May 2005 and STERIS Corporation since October 2003. Dr. Kosecoff holds a B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.S. in Applied Mathematics from Brown University, and a doctorate from University of California, Los Angeles. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Dr. Kosecoff is qualified to serve on our Board based on her extensive healthcare industry experience, leadership gained through her senior management roles in a variety of healthcare companies, and her service on the boards of directors of other public companies. | |
INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
IndependenceKatherine August-deWilde
Compensation Committee (Chair)
Katherine August-deWilde, age 73, has been a member of our Board since October 2013. Ms. August-deWilde is currently Vice Chair and a director of First Republic Bank, a commercial bank specializing in private banking, business banking and wealth management, since January 2016 and served as the President of First Republic Bank from 2007 to 2015. Ms. August-deWilde has served in various roles at First Republic Bank since 1985, including as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Ms. August-deWilde also has served on the board of directors of First Republic Bank since 1988, Eventbrite, Inc. since February 2016, and SunRun, Inc. since January 2016. She is a member of the Catalyst Corporate Board Resource. Ms. August-deWilde holds a B.A. from Goucher College and an M.B.A. from Stanford University Graduate School of Directors
Generally, under the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. The Board has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of its committees and the independence of each director. The Board has determined that, other than Mr. Goldfield, by virtue of his position as Chief Executive Officer, none of our directors has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each is “independent” as that term is defined under the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE. Accordingly, a majority of the members of the Board is independent, as required under applicable NYSE rules. In making this determination, the Board considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with TriNet and all other facts and circumstances the Board deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director.
Board Leadership Structure
We believe that separation of the positions of Chairman of the Board (the “Board Chair”) and Chief Executive Officer reinforces the independence of the Board in its oversight of the business and affairs of the Company. We also believe that having an independent Board Chair creates an environment that is more conducive to objective evaluation and oversight of management’s performance, increasing management accountability and improving the ability of the Board to monitor whether management’s actions are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As a result, we believe that having an independent Board Chair can enhance the effectiveness of the Board as a whole. The current Board Chair, Mr. Bingham, has authority, among other things, to call and preside over Board meetings, to set meeting agendas and to determine materials to be distributed to the Board. Accordingly, the Board Chair has substantial ability to shape the work of the Board. The Board has also appointed Mr. Bingham to serve as the Board’s lead independent director. As lead independent director, Mr. Bingham presides over periodic meetings of the Board’s independent directors, serves as a liaison between our Chief Executive Officer and the independent directors and performs such additional duties as the Board may otherwise determine and delegate.
Role of the Board in Risk Oversight
One of the Board’s key functions is informed oversight of our risk management process. The Board does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through the Board as a whole, as well as through various Board standing committees that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, the Board is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure, including a determination of the nature and level of risk appropriate for TriNet. The Audit Committee has the responsibility to consider and discuss our major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. The Audit Committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, in addition to oversight of the performance of our internal audit function.Business. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee monitorsbelieves that Ms. August-deWilde is qualified to serve on our Board based on her experience as a corporate executive, her financial expertise, and her service on the effectivenessboards of directors of other public companies.
| | | | | |
Director since 2008 Independent | H. Raymond Bingham Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chair) Compensation Committee (Member) H. Raymond Bingham, age 75, has been a member of our Board since July 2008 and served as the Chair of our Board from January 2010 to May 2018. He is a partner of Canyon Bridge Capital Partners, a global private equity buyout firm, and has served as Executive Chairman of Imagination Technologies since November 2016. From 2015 to 2016, he was an Advisory Director of Riverwood Capital Management, a private equity firm that invests in high-growth technology companies. From January 2010 to December 2015, Mr. Bingham was an Advisory Director of General Atlantic, a global growth equity firm, and served as a Managing Director from September 2006 to December 2009. Previously, Mr. Bingham served on the board of directors of Cypress Semiconductor from March 2015 to June 2017 and as Executive Chairman from August 2016 to June 2017. He also previously served on the board of directors of Flextronics International Ltd. from October 2005 to June 2017, Oracle Corporation from November 2002 to March 2017, DHI Group, Inc. from July 2009 to April 2015, Spansion, Inc. from May 2010 to March 2015, Fusion-io, Inc. from February 2011 to July 2014, and STMicroelectronics from April 2007 to April 2013. Mr. Bingham holds a B.S. in Economics from Weber State University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Additionally, he was awarded an Honorary Doctorate of Humanities from Weber State University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Bingham is qualified to serve on our Board based on his broad and extensive experience serving in management roles at technology companies, including as chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as well as his significant service on the board of directors of other publicly traded companies, and his extensive knowledge and experience managing portfolio companies both within and outside our industry. |
| | | | | |
Director since 2021 Independent | Ralph A. Clark Ralph Clark, age 62, serves as the President and CEO of ShotSpotter, Inc., a publicly traded (NASDAQ SSTI) SaaS based acoustic surveillance and precision policing solutions company. The company is focused on law enforcement agencies and security personnel globally and includes over 100 municipalities and their respective LE agencies as clients. Mr. Clark joined ShotSpotter in 2010 and led the business model and technology transformation resulting in ShotSpotter's category leading platform expansion, sustained revenue growth and recent full year GAAP profitability. Mr. Clark successfully orchestrated ShotSpotter's initial public offering in 2017 bringing on high quality institutional investor firms such as Gilder Gagnon and Federated as public market institutional investors. The company's market capitalization has grown since going public and is recognized as a market pioneer and leader in precision policing solutions. Prior to joining ShotSpotter, Mr. Clark was the CEO of GuardianEdge Technologies, a leading end-point data protection company that he joined in 2005 which was acquired by Symantec in 2010 for approximately $100 million. Mr. Clark is proud to have started his career as an IBM large systems marketing representative in the early 1980's working in Seattle with primary responsibility for large systems sales to Boeing Computer Services. After business school, Mr. Clark spent three years in investment banking with Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch prior to moving back to his hometown in Oakland, California to re-pursue a career in leading high growth technology companies. Mr. Clark holds a B.S. in Economics from University of the Pacific and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Clark is qualified to serve on our Board based on his significant management experience in small and medium sized businesses, his current role as the chief executive officer of a publicly traded company and his multiple experiences as a TriNet client. |
| | | | | |
Director since 2020 Independent | Maria Contreras-Sweet Risk Committee (Member) Maria Contreras-Sweet, 65, has been a director since November 2020. In October 2017, she became the Managing Member of both Contreras Sweet Companies, LLC, a marketing and research solutions company, and Rockway Equity Partners, LLC, a private-equity firm that invests in small and mid-size companies. From April 2014 through January 2017, she served as the 24th Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration and as a member of President Obama’s cabinet where she managed the world’s largest seed fund and the largest middle market fund of funds, as well as a $120 billion loan portfolio. In addition, Ms. Contreras-Sweet led a major initiative to bring the Small Business Administration ("SBA") into the digital age and expand into broader domestic and global markets. At the time, SBA reached historic levels in lending and contracting for small businesses. Prior, Ms. Contreras-Sweet was a founder of ProAmerica Bank where she served as Executive Chairwoman from 2006 to 2014. The bank served the small and middle market. She was Co-Founder and Managing Partner of Fortius Holdings from 2004 to 2006. Prior to that, she served as the California cabinet Secretary of the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency from 1999 to 2003 where she oversaw 42,000 employees with a $14 billion budget. While there she led in the creation of the Department of Managed Healthcare, the state's HMO regulator, and reached new levels of partnering with small businesses on California’s multi-billion dollar infrastructure program. She is a director of Sempra Energy, Regional Management Corporation and on the nonprofit boards of the Bipartisan Policy Center, Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall and is a distinguished fellow of the Larta Institute. Prior, she served on the board of directors of Blue Cross of California and as a Founding Director of The California Endowment, a healthcare philanthropy. Ms. Contreras-Sweet has been bestowed with numerous Honorary Doctorates including from Tufts University, Whittier College and California State University, Los Angeles. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Ms. Contreras-Sweet possesses extensive knowledge and executive experience in state and federal government, corporate, entrepreneurial and nonprofit sectors. She brings a strong understanding of banking, corporate governance, guidelines, including whether theyhealthcare, and global innovation, extensive experience with small and medium-sized enterprises, and deep familiarity with state and federal regulatory bodies which makes her a valuable contributor to the Board. |
| | | | | |
Director since 2020 Independent | Shawn Guertin Risk Committee (Chair) Audit Committee (Member) Shawn Guertin, age 57, has been a member of our Board since January 2020. While at Aetna, Inc., Mr. Guertin served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Enterprise Risk Officer from January 2014 to May 2019 and as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Enterprise Risk Officer from February 2013 to January 2014, where he was responsible for overseeing a plethora of finance related duties, mergers and acquisitions and risk management. Prior to these roles, while at Aetna, Inc., he served as the Head of Business Segment Finance from April 2011 to February 2013. Prior to joining Aetna, Inc., from 2010 to 2011, he served as a consultant to Coventry Health Care. Prior to this role, while at Coventry HealthCare, from 2005 to 2009, he served as a Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and, from 1998 to 2004, as Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary. In September 2020, Mr. Guertin joined the board of directors of Da Vita. Mr. Guertin holds a B.A. from Boston University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Guertin is qualified to serve on our Board based on his significant management experience in the healthcare industry and his experience as a chief financial officer and chief enterprise risk officer of a public company. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE IN FAVOR OF EACH NAMED NOMINEE
Directors Continuing in Office Until Our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
| | | | | |
Director since 1988 Independent | Martin Babinec Martin Babinec, age 66, founded TriNet in 1988 and has served on our Board since that time, serving as Chair until December 2009. From 1988 until May 2008, he also served as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Babinec founded and serves as Managing Director of UpVentures Capital, an early-stage investor; co-founded and is a member of the management committee of Rock City Development LLC; founded and serves as Chair of Upstate Venture Connect and Entrepreneurs Across Borders, both of which are successfulentrepreneur-led non-profits; and UpMobility, a family foundation. Mr. Babinec holds a B.S. in preventing illegal or improper liability-creating conduct.Business Administration from Shippensburg University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Babinec is qualified to serve on our Board based on his significant business experience, both inside and outside our industry, and because his role as our founder and former Chief Executive Officer brings unique insight to the Board. |
| | | | | |
Director since 2015 Independent | Paul Chamberlain Audit Committee (Member) Paul Chamberlain, age 57, has been a member of our Board since December 2015. Mr. Chamberlain currently operates his own strategic and financial advisory firm, PEC Ventures. Prior to starting PEC Ventures in January 2015, he worked at Morgan Stanley, a multinational investment bank and financial services company, for 26 years, most recently as Managing Director and Co-Head of Global Technology Banking. Mr. Chamberlain has served on the board of directors of Veeva Systems, Inc. since December 2015 and ServiceNow, Inc. since October 2016. He also has worked as a visiting professor and adjunct professor at Princeton University’s Keller Center for Entrepreneurial Studies and Santa Clara University’s Leavey School of Business, respectively. Mr. Chamberlain chairs the Strategic Advisory Committee of JobTrain, the Menlo Park, California-based vocational and life skills training group focused on the neediest in the Silicon Valley community. He holds a B.A. in History, magna cum laude, from Princeton University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Chamberlain is qualified to serve on our Board based on his strategic and financial expertise and his past experience as a Managing Director of Morgan Stanley. |
| |
Director since 2009 Independent | Wayne B. Lowell Audit Committee (Chair) Risk Committee (Member) Wayne B. Lowell, age 65, has been a member of our Board since August 2009. From March 2012 until November 2017, Mr. Lowell served as Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Senior Whole Health Holdings, Inc., a health insurance company focused on providing health insurance coverage to senior citizens. From 1998 to 2012, he served as President of Jonchra Associates, LLC, which provided strategic, operating and financial advice to senior management of private-equity funded and publicly held entities. Earlier, he worked for PacifiCare Health Systems, which was a Fortune 500 healthcare company, where he held various positions of increasing authority, ultimately serving as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer. Mr. Lowell served on the board of directors of Addus Homecare Corporation, from January 2010 to June 2013. Mr. Lowell holds a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Maryland and an M.B.A. from the University of California, Irvine. Mr. Lowell is a Certified Public Accountant. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Lowell is qualified to serve on our Board based on his years of experience in the health care industry and his past experience as a chief financial officer. |
Directors Continuing in Office Until Our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
| | | | | |
Director since 2017 Independent | Michael J. Angelakis Compensation Committee assesses(Member) Nominating and monitors whether anyCorporate Governance Committee (Member) Michael J. Angelakis, age 56, has been a member of our compensation policiesBoard since February 2017. Mr. Angelakis has served as the Chairman and programs hasChief Executive Officer of Atairos Management, L.P., an independent, private investment firm, since August 2015. Mr. Angelakis also serves as a Senior Advisor to the potentialExecutive Management Committee of Comcast Corporation, a leading media and telecommunications company, since July 2015. Prior to encourage excessive risk-taking. Typically,founding Atairos, he served as Comcast Corporation’s Vice Chair from March 2007 to October 2015 and Chief Financial Officer from March 2007 to July 2015. Mr. Angelakis also serves on the applicableboard of directors of ExxonMobil since March 2021 and of Groupon, Inc. since April 2016. He previously served on the board of directors of Hewlett Packard Enterprises from October 2015 to March 2020 and Duke Energy Corporation from October 2015 to August 2017, as the Chairman of the Board committees meetfor the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia from October 2015 to August 2017, and as a Trustee of Babson College. Mr. Angelakis was elected as a director of TriNet pursuant to the terms of the Stockholder Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2016, between TriNet and AGI-T, L.P., an affiliate of Atairos Group, Inc. Mr. Angelakis holds a B.S. from Babson College and is a graduate of the O/P Management Program at least annually withHarvard Business School. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Angelakis is qualified to serve on the employees responsible for riskBoard based on his extensive investment, financial and managerial experience and leadership gained through his senior management roles in the committees’ respectivemedia and telecommunications industries, including as the chief financial officer of a public company, as well as experience as a director of other public companies. |
| | | | | |
Director since 2008 President and Chief Executive Officer | Burton M. Goldfield Burton M. Goldfield, age 65, joined TriNet as Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board in May 2008. Prior to joining TriNet, Mr. Goldfield was Chief Executive Officer at Ketera Technologies, a SaaS provider to Fortune 2000 companies. Before that, Mr. Goldfield served as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations at Hyperion Solutions Corporation, a software company, and Vice President of Worldwide Sales for IBM Corporation’s multinational information technology company, Rational Software division. Mr. Goldfield also previously served on the board of directors of DHI Group, Inc. from December 2014 to May 2019. Mr. Goldfield holds a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Syracuse University and an M.B.A. from Villanova University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Goldfield is qualified to serve on our Board based on his operational and strategic expertise from his previous executive positions with other large companies, as well as his past experience as a director of another public company. |
| | | | | |
Director since 2005 Independent | David C. Hodgson Board of Directors (Chair) Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Member) David C. Hodgson, age 64, has been a member of our Board since June 2005 and has served as the Chair of our Board since May 2018. Mr. Hodgson is Vice Chairman and a Managing Director of General Atlantic, a global growth private equity firm. He joined General Atlantic in 1982, helped found their partnership, and has over 35 years of experience identifying and assisting portfolio companies worldwide in all areas of oversight. Both the Board as a wholetheir development. Mr. Hodgson is former Chair and the various standing committees receive periodic and incidental reports as matters may arise from the Chief Compliance Officer, who is our Chief Legal Officer, regarding violations of the Code of Ethics, and the Internal Audit Department, regarding the annual fraud risk survey results and ethics hotline activity. It is the responsibility of the committee chairs to report findings regarding material risk exposures to the Board as quickly as possible.
Meetingscurrent member of the Board of Directors
The Board met six times during 2015. Each Board member attended 75% or moreTrustees of Johns Hopkins Medicine. He serves on the board of directors of Johns Hopkins HealthCare and Johns Hopkins Medicine International. He is Chair of the aggregate number of meetingsManhattan Theatre Club, serves on the President's Leadership Council of the Dartmouth College Board of Trustees, and is a member of the committees on which he or she served, held during the portionAdvisory Council at Stanford Graduate School of Business. Mr. Hodgson is Chairman Emeritus of the last fiscal year ending December 31, 2015 for which he or she was a director or committee member. In addition, our non-managementboard of Echoing Green and is Trustee Emeritus of Johns Hopkins University. Previously, Mr. Hodgson served on the board of directors met five timesof DHI Group, Inc. from August 2005 to May 2014. Mr. Hodgson holds an A.B. in 2015 in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only non-management directors were present. Mr. Bingham, as our lead director, presided overMathematics and Social Sciences from Dartmouth College and an M.B.A. from the executive sessions.
Information Regarding CommitteesStanford University Graduate School of the Board of Directors
Business. The Board has three committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The following table provides membership and meeting information for each of theCommittee believes that Mr. Hodgson is qualified to serve on our Board committees in 2015: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Name | | Audit | | | | Compensation | | | | Nominating
and
Corporate
Governance | | | | Burton M. Goldfield | | | | | | | | | | | | | | H. Raymond Bingham | | | | | | X* | | | | X | | | | Katherine August-deWilde | | X | | | | | | | | X | | | | Martin Babinec | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Paul Chamberlain | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Kenneth Goldman | | X* | | | | | | | | | | | | David C. Hodgson | | | | | | | | | | X* | | | | John H. Kispert | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | Wayne B. Lowell | | X | | | | X | | | | | | | | Total meetings in 2015 | | 10 | | | | 6 | | | | 2 | | |
*Committee Chairperson
Audit Committee
The Board has determined that eachbased on his experience as a member of the Auditboards of directors of a number of public and private companies and his experience assisting companies in their development as a Managing Director of General Atlantic.
|
| | | | | | |
Director since 2020 Independent | Jacqueline Kosecoff Compensation Committee is independent under NYSE listing standards(Member) Jacqueline Kosecoff, age 71, has been a member of our Board since January 2020. Since March 2012, Dr. Kosecoff has been a Managing Partner of Moriah Partners, where she works to identify, select, mentor and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) promulgated undermanage health services and IT companies, and a Senior Advisor of Warburg Pincus, a private equity investing firm. From 2005 to 2012, Dr. Kosecoff was a senior executive inside UnitedHealth Group-PacifiCare. Dr. Kosecoff joined UnitedHealth Group as part of its acquisition of PacifiCare Health Systems in 2005 and took responsibility for, among other areas, the Exchange Act is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC regulations, and has the requisite financial expertise required under the applicable requirements of the NYSE. In arriving at this determination, the Board examined each Audit Committee member’s scope of experienceMedicare Part D business and the natureconsumer health product division serving seniors. From 2002 to 2005, at PacifiCare Health Systems, Dr. Kosecoff served as Executive Vice President with responsibility for various business segments. Dr. Kosecoff served as Chief Executive Officer of his or her employment inPrescription Solutions (now known as OptumRx) from 2006 to 2011. From 1998 to 2002, Dr. Kosecoff was founder, President and Chief Operating Officer of Protocare, a firm whose lines of business included the corporate finance sector. The primary functionsclinical development of drugs, devices, biopharmaceutical and nutritional products, and health services consulting. Dr. Kosecoff served as Professor of Medicine and Public Health at the Audit Committee include: reviewing and pre-approving the engagementUniversity of our independent registered public accounting firmCalifornia, Los Angeles from 1975 to perform audit services and any permissible non-audit services;
evaluating the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm and deciding whether to retain its services;
monitoring the rotation of partners2006. Dr. Kosecoff has also served on the engagement teamboard of our independent registereddirectors of GoodRx since May 2016 (company went public accounting firm;
reviewing our annualin September 2020), Houlihan Lokey since June 2016, Sealed Air Corporation since May 2005 and quarterly financial statementsSTERIS Corporation since October 2003. Dr. Kosecoff holds a B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.S. in Applied Mathematics from Brown University, and reportsa doctorate from University of California, Los Angeles. The Nominating and discussing the statements and reports with our independent registered public accounting firm and management, including a review of disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”;
considering and approving or disapproving of all related party transactions;
reviewing, with our independent registered public accounting firm and management, significant issuesCorporate Governance Committee believes that may arise regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentation, as well as matters concerning the scope, adequacy and effectiveness of our financial controls;
conducting an annual assessment of the performance of the Audit Committee and its members, and the adequacy of its charter; and
establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding financial controls, accounting or auditing matters.
The Audit Committee has authorityDr. Kosecoff is qualified to engage legal counsel or other experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. The Board has adopted a written Audit Committee charter that is available to stockholdersserve on our website at http://investor.trinet.com/company/investors-relations/governance/documents-charters/default.aspx.
ReportBoard based on her extensive healthcare industry experience, leadership gained through her senior management roles in a variety of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors(1)
The Audit Committee has reviewedhealthcare companies, and discussed the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 with our management. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountants’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the accounting firm’s independence. Basedher service on the foregoing, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.boards of directors of other public companies.
Kenneth Goldman
| |
INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Katherine August-deWilde
Compensation Committee (Chair)
Katherine August-deWilde, age 73, has been a member of our Board since October 2013. Ms. August-deWilde is currently Vice Chair and a director of First Republic Bank, a commercial bank specializing in private banking, business banking and wealth management, since January 2016 and served as the President of First Republic Bank from 2007 to 2015. Ms. August-deWilde has served in various roles at First Republic Bank since 1985, including as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Ms. August-deWilde also has served on the board of directors of First Republic Bank since 1988, Eventbrite, Inc. since February 2016, and SunRun, Inc. since January 2016. She is a member of the Catalyst Corporate Board Resource. Ms. August-deWilde holds a B.A. from Goucher College and an M.B.A. from Stanford University Graduate School of Business. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Ms. August-deWilde is qualified to serve on our Board based on her experience as a corporate executive, her financial expertise, and her service on the boards of directors of other public companies.
| | | | | |
Director since 2008 Independent | H. Raymond Bingham Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chair) Compensation Committee (Member) H. Raymond Bingham, age 75, has been a member of our Board since July 2008 and served as the Chair of our Board from January 2010 to May 2018. He is a partner of Canyon Bridge Capital Partners, a global private equity buyout firm, and has served as Executive Chairman of Imagination Technologies since November 2016. From 2015 to 2016, he was an Advisory Director of Riverwood Capital Management, a private equity firm that invests in high-growth technology companies. From January 2010 to December 2015, Mr. Bingham was an Advisory Director of General Atlantic, a global growth equity firm, and served as a Managing Director from September 2006 to December 2009. Previously, Mr. Bingham served on the board of directors of Cypress Semiconductor from March 2015 to June 2017 and as Executive Chairman from August 2016 to June 2017. He also previously served on the board of directors of Flextronics International Ltd. from October 2005 to June 2017, Oracle Corporation from November 2002 to March 2017, DHI Group, Inc. from July 2009 to April 2015, Spansion, Inc. from May 2010 to March 2015, Fusion-io, Inc. from February 2011 to July 2014, and STMicroelectronics from April 2007 to April 2013. Mr. Bingham holds a B.S. in Economics from Weber State University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Additionally, he was awarded an Honorary Doctorate of Humanities from Weber State University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Bingham is qualified to serve on our Board based on his broad and extensive experience serving in management roles at technology companies, including as chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as well as his significant service on the board of directors of other publicly traded companies, and his extensive knowledge and experience managing portfolio companies both within and outside our industry. |
| | | | | |
Director since 2021 Independent | Ralph A. Clark Ralph Clark, age 62, serves as the President and CEO of ShotSpotter, Inc., a publicly traded (NASDAQ SSTI) SaaS based acoustic surveillance and precision policing solutions company. The company is focused on law enforcement agencies and security personnel globally and includes over 100 municipalities and their respective LE agencies as clients. Mr. Clark joined ShotSpotter in 2010 and led the business model and technology transformation resulting in ShotSpotter's category leading platform expansion, sustained revenue growth and recent full year GAAP profitability. Mr. Clark successfully orchestrated ShotSpotter's initial public offering in 2017 bringing on high quality institutional investor firms such as Gilder Gagnon and Federated as public market institutional investors. The company's market capitalization has grown since going public and is recognized as a market pioneer and leader in precision policing solutions. Prior to joining ShotSpotter, Mr. Clark was the CEO of GuardianEdge Technologies, a leading end-point data protection company that he joined in 2005 which was acquired by Symantec in 2010 for approximately $100 million. Mr. Clark is proud to have started his career as an IBM large systems marketing representative in the early 1980's working in Seattle with primary responsibility for large systems sales to Boeing Computer Services. After business school, Mr. Clark spent three years in investment banking with Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch prior to moving back to his hometown in Oakland, California to re-pursue a career in leading high growth technology companies. Mr. Clark holds a B.S. in Economics from University of the Pacific and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Clark is qualified to serve on our Board based on his significant management experience in small and medium sized businesses, his current role as the chief executive officer of a publicly traded company and his multiple experiences as a TriNet client. |
| | | | | |
Director since 2020 Independent | Maria Contreras-Sweet Risk Committee (Member) Maria Contreras-Sweet, 65, has been a director since November 2020. In October 2017, she became the Managing Member of both Contreras Sweet Companies, LLC, a marketing and research solutions company, and Rockway Equity Partners, LLC, a private-equity firm that invests in small and mid-size companies. From April 2014 through January 2017, she served as the 24th Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration and as a member of President Obama’s cabinet where she managed the world’s largest seed fund and the largest middle market fund of funds, as well as a $120 billion loan portfolio. In addition, Ms. Contreras-Sweet led a major initiative to bring the Small Business Administration ("SBA") into the digital age and expand into broader domestic and global markets. At the time, SBA reached historic levels in lending and contracting for small businesses. Prior, Ms. Contreras-Sweet was a founder of ProAmerica Bank where she served as Executive Chairwoman from 2006 to 2014. The bank served the small and middle market. She was Co-Founder and Managing Partner of Fortius Holdings from 2004 to 2006. Prior to that, she served as the California cabinet Secretary of the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency from 1999 to 2003 where she oversaw 42,000 employees with a $14 billion budget. While there she led in the creation of the Department of Managed Healthcare, the state's HMO regulator, and reached new levels of partnering with small businesses on California’s multi-billion dollar infrastructure program. She is a director of Sempra Energy, Regional Management Corporation and on the nonprofit boards of the Bipartisan Policy Center, Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall and is a distinguished fellow of the Larta Institute. Prior, she served on the board of directors of Blue Cross of California and as a Founding Director of The California Endowment, a healthcare philanthropy. Ms. Contreras-Sweet has been bestowed with numerous Honorary Doctorates including from Tufts University, Whittier College and California State University, Los Angeles. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Ms. Contreras-Sweet possesses extensive knowledge and executive experience in state and federal government, corporate, entrepreneurial and nonprofit sectors. She brings a strong understanding of banking, corporate governance, healthcare, and global innovation, extensive experience with small and medium-sized enterprises, and deep familiarity with state and federal regulatory bodies which makes her a valuable contributor to the Board. |
| | | | | |
Director since 2020 Independent | Shawn Guertin Risk Committee (Chair) Audit Committee (Member) Shawn Guertin, age 57, has been a member of our Board since January 2020. While at Aetna, Inc., Mr. Guertin served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Enterprise Risk Officer from January 2014 to May 2019 and as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Enterprise Risk Officer from February 2013 to January 2014, where he was responsible for overseeing a plethora of finance related duties, mergers and acquisitions and risk management. Prior to these roles, while at Aetna, Inc., he served as the Head of Business Segment Finance from April 2011 to February 2013. Prior to joining Aetna, Inc., from 2010 to 2011, he served as a consultant to Coventry Health Care. Prior to this role, while at Coventry HealthCare, from 2005 to 2009, he served as a Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and, from 1998 to 2004, as Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary. In September 2020, Mr. Guertin joined the board of directors of Da Vita. Mr. Guertin holds a B.A. from Boston University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Guertin is qualified to serve on our Board based on his significant management experience in the healthcare industry and his experience as a chief financial officer and chief enterprise risk officer of a public company. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE IN FAVOR OF EACH NAMED NOMINEE
Directors Continuing in Office Until Our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
| | | | | |
Director since 1988 Independent | Martin Babinec Martin Babinec, age 66, founded TriNet in 1988 and has served on our Board since that time, serving as Chair until December 2009. From 1988 until May 2008, he also served as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Babinec founded and serves as Managing Director of UpVentures Capital, an early-stage investor; co-founded and is a member of the management committee of Rock City Development LLC; founded and serves as Chair of Upstate Venture Connect and Entrepreneurs Across Borders, both of which are entrepreneur-led non-profits; and UpMobility, a family foundation. Mr. Babinec holds a B.S. in Business Administration from Shippensburg University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Babinec is qualified to serve on our Board based on his significant business experience, both inside and outside our industry, and because his role as our founder and former Chief Executive Officer brings unique insight to the Board. |
| | | | | |
Director since 2015 Independent | Paul Chamberlain Audit Committee (Member) Paul Chamberlain, age 57, has been a member of our Board since December 2015. Mr. Chamberlain currently operates his own strategic and financial advisory firm, PEC Ventures. Prior to starting PEC Ventures in January 2015, he worked at Morgan Stanley, a multinational investment bank and financial services company, for 26 years, most recently as Managing Director and Co-Head of Global Technology Banking. Mr. Chamberlain has served on the board of directors of Veeva Systems, Inc. since December 2015 and ServiceNow, Inc. since October 2016. He also has worked as a visiting professor and adjunct professor at Princeton University’s Keller Center for Entrepreneurial Studies and Santa Clara University’s Leavey School of Business, respectively. Mr. Chamberlain chairs the Strategic Advisory Committee of JobTrain, the Menlo Park, California-based vocational and life skills training group focused on the neediest in the Silicon Valley community. He holds a B.A. in History, magna cum laude, from Princeton University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Chamberlain is qualified to serve on our Board based on his strategic and financial expertise and his past experience as a Managing Director of Morgan Stanley. |
| |
Director since 2009 Independent | Wayne B. Lowell _______________________
| | (1) | The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing. |
CompensationAudit Committee (Chair)
The BoardRisk Committee (Member)
Wayne B. Lowell, age 65, has determined that eachbeen a member of our Board since August 2009. From March 2012 until November 2017, Mr. Lowell served as Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Senior Whole Health Holdings, Inc., a health insurance company focused on providing health insurance coverage to senior citizens. From 1998 to 2012, he served as President of Jonchra Associates, LLC, which provided strategic, operating and financial advice to senior management of private-equity funded and publicly held entities. Earlier, he worked for PacifiCare Health Systems, which was a Fortune 500 healthcare company, where he held various positions of increasing authority, ultimately serving as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer. Mr. Lowell served on the Compensation Committee is independent under NYSE listing standards and Rule 10C-1 promulgated underboard of directors of Addus Homecare Corporation, from January 2010 to June 2013. Mr. Lowell holds a B.S. in Accounting from the Exchange Act, a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange ActUniversity of Maryland and an “outside director” asM.B.A. from the University of California, Irvine. Mr. Lowell is a Certified Public Accountant. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that termMr. Lowell is defined in Section 162(m)qualified to serve on our Board based on his years of the Internal Revenue Code. The functions of the Compensation Committee include: determining and approving goals or objectives relevant to the compensation of our executive officers, evaluating their performance in light of such goals and objectives and their compensation and other terms of employment in light of such performance goals and objectives, including reviewing and approving any employment agreements, severance agreements, change in control provisions and any other compensatory arrangements;
reviewing and approving the compensation of Board members, including consulting, retainer, Board meeting, committee and committee chair fees and equity grants or awards;
overseeing administration of our equity incentive plans, establishing guidelines, interpreting plan documents, approving grants and awards, and exercising such other power and authority as may be permitted or required under such plans;
reviewing and recommending to the Board the adoption, amendment and termination of our equity incentive plans;
assessing the independence of each compensation consultant, legal counsel and other advisor to the Compensation Committee, in accordance with and to the extent required by applicable law and the listing requirements of any stock exchange on which any of our capital stock is listed;
reviewing and discussing with our management the disclosures contained under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for use in any of our annual reports on Form 10-K, registration statements or proxy statements, in accordance with
and to the extent required by applicable law and the listing requirements of any stock exchange on which our capital stock is listed, and recommending to the Board that such Compensation Discussion and Analysis be approved for inclusion therein;
preparing and reviewing the Compensation Committee’s report on executive compensation to be included in our annual proxy statement, in accordance with and to the extent required by applicable law and the listing requirements of any stock exchange on which our capital stock is listed;
investigating any matter brought to the attention of the Compensation Committee within the scope of its duties if,experience in the judgment of the Compensation Committee, such investigation is appropriate;health care industry and his past experience as a chief financial officer.
|
Directors Continuing in Office Until Our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
reviewing and assessing the adequacy of the Compensation Committee’s charter periodically and recommending any proposed changes to the Board for approval; and | | | | | |
conducting an evaluation of the performance of the Compensation Committee periodically.Director since 2017
The Board has adopted a written Compensation Committee charter that is available to stockholders on our website at http://investor.trinet.com/company/investors-relations/governance/documents-charters/default.aspx.Independent
| Michael J. Angelakis Compensation Committee Processes(Member) Nominating and ProceduresCorporate Governance Committee (Member) Typically,Michael J. Angelakis, age 56, has been a member of our Board since February 2017. Mr. Angelakis has served as the CompensationChairman and Chief Executive Officer of Atairos Management, L.P., an independent, private investment firm, since August 2015. Mr. Angelakis also serves as a Senior Advisor to the Executive Management Committee meets regularly duringof Comcast Corporation, a leading media and telecommunications company, since July 2015. Prior to founding Atairos, he served as Comcast Corporation’s Vice Chair from March 2007 to October 2015 and Chief Financial Officer from March 2007 to July 2015. Mr. Angelakis also serves on the year. The agenda for each meeting is usually developed byboard of directors of ExxonMobil since March 2021 and of Groupon, Inc. since April 2016. He previously served on the board of directors of Hewlett Packard Enterprises from October 2015 to March 2020 and Duke Energy Corporation from October 2015 to August 2017, as the Chairman of the CompensationBoard for the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia from October 2015 to August 2017, and as a Trustee of Babson College. Mr. Angelakis was elected as a director of TriNet pursuant to the terms of the Stockholder Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2016, between TriNet and AGI-T, L.P., an affiliate of Atairos Group, Inc. Mr. Angelakis holds a B.S. from Babson College and is a graduate of the O/P Management Program at Harvard Business School. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oftenbelieves that Mr. Angelakis is qualified to serve on the Board based on his extensive investment, financial and managerial experience and leadership gained through his senior management roles in consultation with the media and telecommunications industries, including as the chief financial officer of a public company, as well as experience as a director of other public companies.
|
| | | | | |
Director since 2008 President and Chief Executive Officer | Burton M. Goldfield Burton M. Goldfield, age 65, joined TriNet as Chief LegalExecutive Officer and a member of our Human Resources DepartmentBoard in May 2008. Prior to joining TriNet, Mr. Goldfield was Chief Executive Officer at Ketera Technologies, a SaaS provider to Fortune 2000 companies. Before that, Mr. Goldfield served as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Field Operations at Hyperion Solutions Corporation, a software company, and Vice President of Worldwide Sales for IBM Corporation’s multinational information technology company, Rational Software division. Mr. Goldfield also previously served on the board of directors of DHI Group, Inc. from December 2014 to May 2019. Mr. Goldfield holds a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Syracuse University and an M.B.A. from Villanova University. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Goldfield is qualified to serve on our outside compensation consultants, if applicable. The Compensation Committee meets regularly inBoard based on his operational and strategic expertise from his previous executive session. From time to time, various members of management andpositions with other employeeslarge companies, as well as outside advisors or consultants may be invited byhis past experience as a director of another public company. |
| | | | | |
Director since 2005 Independent | David C. Hodgson Board of Directors (Chair) Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Member) David C. Hodgson, age 64, has been a member of our Board since June 2005 and has served as the Chair of our Board since May 2018. Mr. Hodgson is Vice Chairman and a Managing Director of General Atlantic, a global growth private equity firm. He joined General Atlantic in 1982, helped found their partnership, and has over 35 years of experience identifying and assisting portfolio companies worldwide in all areas of their development. Mr. Hodgson is former Chair and current member of the Board of Trustees of Johns Hopkins Medicine. He serves on the board of directors of Johns Hopkins HealthCare and Johns Hopkins Medicine International. He is Chair of the Manhattan Theatre Club, serves on the President's Leadership Council of the Dartmouth College Board of Trustees, and is a member of the Advisory Council at Stanford Graduate School of Business. Mr. Hodgson is Chairman Emeritus of the board of Echoing Green and is Trustee Emeritus of Johns Hopkins University. Previously, Mr. Hodgson served on the board of directors of DHI Group, Inc. from August 2005 to May 2014. Mr. Hodgson holds an A.B. in Mathematics and Social Sciences from Dartmouth College and an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that Mr. Hodgson is qualified to serve on our Board based on his experience as a member of the boards of directors of a number of public and private companies and his experience assisting companies in their development as a Managing Director of General Atlantic. |
| | | | | | |
Director since 2020 Independent | Jacqueline Kosecoff Compensation Committee to make presentations, to provide financial or other background information or advice or to otherwise participate in Compensation Committee meetings. The Chief Executive Officer may not participate in, or be present during, any deliberations or determinations of the Compensation Committee regarding his compensation or individual performance objectives.(Member) The charter of the Compensation Committee grants the Compensation Committee full access to allJacqueline Kosecoff, age 71, has been a member of our books, records, facilitiesBoard since January 2020. Since March 2012, Dr. Kosecoff has been a Managing Partner of Moriah Partners, where she works to identify, select, mentor and personnel. In addition, under the charter, the Compensation Committee has authoritymanage health services and IT companies, and a Senior Advisor of Warburg Pincus, a private equity investing firm. From 2005 to engage legal counsel or other experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. The Compensation Committee has direct responsibility for the oversight of the work of any advisers engaged for the purpose of advising the Compensation Committee. In particular, the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain compensation consultants to assist in its evaluation of2012, Dr. Kosecoff was a senior executive and director compensation, including the authority to approve the consultant’s reasonable fees and other retention terms. Under the charter, the Compensation Committee may select, or receive advice from, a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser to the Compensation Committee, other than in-house legal counsel and certain other types of advisers, only after taking into consideration six factors, prescribed by the SEC and NYSE, that bear upon the adviser’s independence; however, there is no requirement that any adviser be independent.
After taking into consideration the factors prescribed by the SEC and NYSE, the Compensation Committee engaged Compensia as compensation consultants. In 2015, the Compensation Committee requested that Compensia,inside UnitedHealth Group-PacifiCare. Dr. Kosecoff joined UnitedHealth Group as part of its engagement:
assistacquisition of PacifiCare Health Systems in refining our compensation strategy2005 and intook responsibility for, among other areas, the design ofMedicare Part D business and the annual and long-term incentive compensation plansconsumer health product division serving seniors. From 2002 to 2005, at PacifiCare Health Systems, Dr. Kosecoff served as Executive Vice President with responsibility for our senior personnel;
evaluate the efficacy of our compensation practices in supporting and reinforcing our long-term strategic goals;
provide advice with respect to compensation best practices and market trends for our senior personnel and members of our Board of Directors;
evaluate our compensation peer group to be used in the development of competitive compensation levels and practices;
evaluate the competitiveness of our executive and director compensation programs;
provide ad hoc advice and support throughout the year; and
assist with the development of our executive compensation-related disclosure in consultation with our outside legal advisers.
The Compensation Committee also asked Compensia to review the comparative group of companies developed in 2014, recommend any changes or updates to that group of companies and perform analyses of competitive performance and compensation levels for that group of companies for 2015. Compensia presented its analysis to the Compensation Committee for its consideration. Management also evaluated the analysis and provided input for the Committee’s consideration. Following an active dialogue with Compensia and management, the Compensation Committee established the 2015 executive compensation program discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.
Historically, the Compensation Committee has made most of the significant adjustments to annual compensation, determined bonus and equity awards and established new performance objectives at one or more meetings held during the first quarter of the year. However,various business segments. Dr. Kosecoff served as circumstances warrant, the Compensation Committee also considers matters, at various meetings throughout the year
related to individual compensation (such as compensation for new executive hires), as well as high-level strategic compensation issues, such as the general efficacy of our compensation strategy, potential modifications to that strategy, retention and performance-specific compensation requirements and new trends, plans or approaches to compensation among our peer group or more generally. Generally, the Compensation Committee’s annual compensation review process comprises two related elements: (1) the determination of compensation levels and (2) the establishment of performance objectives for the current year. For executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer of Prescription Solutions (now known as OptumRx) from 2006 to 2011. From 1998 to 2002, Dr. Kosecoff was founder, President and Chief Operating Officer of Protocare, a firm whose lines of business included the Compensationclinical development of drugs, devices, biopharmaceutical and nutritional products, and health services consulting. Dr. Kosecoff served as Professor of Medicine and Public Health at the University of California, Los Angeles from 1975 to 2006. Dr. Kosecoff has also served on the board of directors of GoodRx since May 2016 (company went public in September 2020), Houlihan Lokey since June 2016, Sealed Air Corporation since May 2005 and STERIS Corporation since October 2003. Dr. Kosecoff holds a B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.S. in Applied Mathematics from Brown University, and a doctorate from University of California, Los Angeles. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee solicitsbelieves that Dr. Kosecoff is qualified to serve on our Board based on her extensive healthcare industry experience, leadership gained through her senior management roles in a variety of healthcare companies, and considers evaluations and recommendations submitted toher service on the Committee by the Chief Executive Officer. In the caseboards of the Chief Executive Officer, the evaluationdirectors of his performance is conducted by the Compensation Committee, which determines any adjustments to his compensation as well as awards to be granted. As part of its deliberations, the Compensation Committee may review and consider materials such as financial reports and projections, operational data, tax and accounting information, total compensation that may become payable to executives, executive and director stock ownership information, company stock performance data, analyses of historical executive compensation levels and current Company-wide compensation levels and recommendations of the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant, including analyses of executive and director compensation paid at other companies, as appropriate.public companies.
| |
INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Independence of the Board of Directors
Our Board has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of its committees and of the independence of each our of directors and determined that, other than Mr. Goldfield, by virtue of his position as our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), each of our directors is “independent” as that term is defined under the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE. In making this determination, our Board considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with TriNet and all other facts and circumstances the Board deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director. There are no family relationships among any of the director nominees, directors or any of our executive officers.
Board Leadership Structure
We separate our Chair of the Board (the “Board Chair”) and CEO to reinforce the independence of our Board in its oversight of our business and affairs. We believe that an independent Board Chair enhances the effectiveness of our Board by being best positioned to objectively evaluate and oversee management’s performance, ensure management accountability, and align management with the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Our Board Chair, Mr. David C. Hodgson, has authority, among other things, to call and preside over Board meetings, to set meeting agendas and to determine the materials distributed to our Board. Mr. Hodgson also serves as the Board’s lead independent director. As lead independent director, Mr. Hodgson presides over periodic meetings of the Board’s independent directors, serves as a liaison between our CEO and the independent directors and performs such additional duties as our Board may otherwise determine and delegate.
Role of the Board in Risk Oversight
One of our Board’s key functions is informed oversight of our risk management process. Our Board administers this oversight function directly as well as through the Board’s standing committees. Our officers are responsible for day-to-day management of the material risks that TriNet faces. Our newly formed Risk Committee reviews the design of our enterprise risk management program, monitors our management's operation of that program, including risk trends, significant risk exposures, and the quality and effectiveness of our technology security, and oversees the nature and level of risk appropriate for TriNet. Our Audit Committee considers and discusses our major financial risk exposures and management actions to monitor and control these exposures, monitors our compliance with legal and regulatory financial requirements, and oversees the performance of our internal audit function. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee monitors the effectiveness of our corporate governance guidelines and oversees governance risks, such as director independence and conflicts of interest. Our Compensation Committee assesses and monitors risks, such as management incentives and potential for excessive risk taking, related to our compensation policies and programs. Our Board receives periodic updates from our management and their independent advisors throughout the year regarding the risks that TriNet faces and reviews our enterprise risk management program at least annually. In addition, our committees meet periodically with our management and their independent advisors to review risks and risk management processes relevant to the committees’ respective areas of oversight. Both our Board and our Board committees receive periodic and incidental reports as matters may arise from our Chief Compliance Officer, who is our Chief Legal Officer (our "CLO"), and our Internal Audit Department, regarding potential violations of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our ethics hotline activity and other complaints we may receive regarding potential ethics violations or our financial controls, accounting and other auditing matters. Our committee chairs are responsible for promptly reporting findings regarding material risk exposures to the Board.
Meetings of the Board of Directors
Our Board held seven meetings during 2020. In 2020, each of our directors attended at least 75% of our 2020 Board meetings, and of the meetings of each committee on which they served, that were held during their service as a Board member in 2020. In addition, our non-management directors met five times in 2020 in scheduled executive sessions at which only non-management directors were present. The Board Chair presided over these executive sessions.
Information Regarding Committees of the Board of Directors
Our Board has four committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a newly formed Risk Committee. The following table provides membership for each of our Board committees as of April 14, 2021:
Audit Committee
The primary functions of our Audit Committee include:
•assist the Board in its oversight of:
•the Company’s corporate accounting and financial reporting processes;
•the Company’s systems of internal control over financial reporting;
•the Company’s audits of financial statements;
•the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial statements and internal controls;
•the qualifications, performance and independence of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm;
•the performance, responsibilities, budget and staffing of the Company’s internal audit function; and
•the Company's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
•conduct an annual assessment of the performance of the Audit Committee, and periodically review and assess the adequacy of its charter;
•establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints, and monitor complaints, received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters; and
•prepare the Committee report that the SEC rules require to be included in the Company’s annual proxy statement.
Our Board has determined that each member of our Audit Committee is independent under NYSE listing standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) promulgated under the Exchange Act, is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC regulations, and has the requisite financial expertise required under the applicable requirements of the NYSE. In arriving at this determination, the Board examined each Audit Committee member’s scope of experience and the nature of their employment in the corporate finance sector.
Our Audit Committee has authority to engage legal counsel or other experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. Our Audit Committee meets regularly in executive session. Our Audit Committee’s authority, duties and responsibilities are described in its charter, which is reviewed annually and updated as warranted. The charter is available in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at http://investor.trinet.com/company/investors-relations/governance/documents-charters/default.aspx. The Audit Committee held nine meetings during 2020.
Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors(1)
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company's audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 with our management. The Audit Committee has discussed with the Company's independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from our independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding our independent accountants’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm the accounting firm’s independence. Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that the Company's audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
The specific determinations of the Compensation Committee with respect to executive compensation for 2015 are described in greater detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement. | | | | | |
| Wayne B. Lowell |
| Paul Chamberlain |
| Shawn Guertin |
(1)The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.
Compensation Committee
The primary functions of our Compensation Committee include:
•determine and approve goals and objectives for our executive compensation program, evaluate executive performance against those goals and objectives, and approve the individual compensation levels and other terms of employment in light of such performance, including, without limitation, reviewing, approving and administering any employment agreements, severance agreements or plans, change in control agreements, plans or provisions and any other compensatory arrangements with our executive officers;
•review and approve the compensation of Board members, including retainer, Board meeting, committee meeting and committee chair fees and equity grants or awards;
•oversee administration of our equity incentive plans, establish guidelines, interpret plan documents, approve grants and awards, and exercise such other power and authority as may be permitted or required under such plans;
•review and recommend to our Board the adoption, amendment and termination of our equity incentive plans;
•review, in consultation with the Company's CEO, the Company's management succession planning, including policies and planning for CEO selection and succession;
•assess the independence of each compensation consultant, legal counsel and other advisor to our Compensation Committee, in accordance with, and to the extent required by, applicable law and the NYSE listing standards;
•review and discuss with our management the disclosures contained under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for use in any of our annual reports on Form 10-K, registration statements and proxy statements, in accordance with, and to the extent required by, applicable law and the NYSE listing standards, and recommending to our Board that such Compensation Discussion and Analysis be approved for inclusion therein;
•prepare and review our Compensation Committee’s reports on executive compensation to be included in our annual proxy statements, in accordance with and to the extent required by applicable law and the NYSE listing standards;
•investigate any matter brought to the attention of our Compensation Committee within the scope of its duties if, in the judgment of our Compensation Committee, such investigation is appropriate;
•review and assess the adequacy of our Compensation Committee’s charter periodically and recommending any proposed changes to our Board for approval; and
•conduct an evaluation of the performance of our Compensation Committee periodically.
Our Board has determined that each member of our Compensation Committee is independent under NYSE listing standards and Rule 10C-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act and a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.
The Compensation Committee’s authority, duties, and responsibilities are described in its charter, which is reviewed annually and revised and updated as warranted. The charter is available in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at http://investor.trinet.com/company/investors-relations/governance/documents-charters/default.aspx. The Compensation Committee held four meetings during 2020.
Compensation Committee Processes and Procedures
Our Compensation Committee meets regularly during the year. The agenda for each meeting is usually developed by the Chair of our Compensation Committee, often in consultation with our CEO, CLO, Senior Vice President of Human Resources and our Compensation Committee's compensation consultant. Our Compensation Committee meets regularly in executive session. From time to time, various members of management and other employees, as well as outside advisors and consultants, attend Compensation Committee meetings to make presentations and provide financial and other background information and advice relevant to Compensation Committee deliberations.
Our CEO does not participate in, or be present during, any deliberations or determinations of our Compensation Committee regarding his compensation or individual performance objectives.
In certain situations, our Compensation Committee may delegate its authority to a subcommittee or our CEO in connection with the grant of certain equity awards. In 2017, our Compensation Committee formed the Equity Award Committee, initially comprised of two members and currently including three members of the Compensation Committee, Mses. August-deWilde and Kosecoff and Mr. Bingham. The primary purpose of the Equity Award Committee is to administer the Company's equity incentive plan and to grant equity awards thereunder, primarily to our Section 16 officers, without limiting the authority of our Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee has delegated to our Company's CEO the authority, subject to certain limitations such as the maximum value for each award, to grant restricted stock unit awards ("RSU Awards") to certain non-executive employees and consultants of the Company, in connection with their hiring or promotion, pursuant to the terms of such policy and the Company's equity incentive plan. In March 2021, this authority was expanded to annual RSU Awards to certain non-executive employees and consultants of the Company.
Under its charter, our Compensation Committee has full access to all of our books, records, facilities and personnel. In addition, under the charter, our Compensation Committee has authority to engage and retain legal counsel, compensation consultants and other experts and consultants, as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. Our Compensation Committee has direct responsibility for the oversight of the work performed by, and for approving the reasonable fees and retention terms of, these advisors.
Under its charter, our Compensation Committee may select, or receive advice from, a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor, other than in-house legal counsel and certain other types of advisors, only after taking into consideration six factors, prescribed by the SEC and as set forth in the NYSE listing standards, that bear upon the advisor’s independence; however, there is no requirement that any advisor be independent. In 2020, after taking these factors into consideration, our Compensation Committee determined that Compensia, Inc., its compensation consultant ("Compensia"), met the independence test outlined herein, confirmed that Compensia's work did not raise any conflicts of interest and engaged Compensia to assist it in connection with its review, analysis and determinations with respect to the compensation of our senior personnel, including our Named Executive Officers. For a list of our Named Executive Officers, see the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Named Executive Officers” below. For a summary of the nature and scope of the services provided to our Compensation Committee by Compensia, see the section titled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Oversight and Design of our Compensation Program-Role of Compensation Consultant" below.
In July 2019, for the 2020 fiscal year, Compensia also reviewed the compensation peer group our Compensation Committee uses to aid in the development of reasonable and competitive compensation practices, recommended changes or updates to our peer group and performed a competitive market analysis of performance and compensation levels for that peer group. Management also evaluated the analysis and provided input for our Compensation Committee’s consideration. Following an active dialogue with Compensia and management, our Compensation Committee established our 2020 executive compensation program, which is discussed in the section titled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" beginning on page 33.
Historically, at one or more meetings in the first quarter of each year, our Compensation Committee conducts its annual review of Company performance against our compensation plan goals and objectives for the prior year, determines executive cash incentive and performance equity award payments under those plans, sets executive compensation levels, and establishes new performance objectives and goals for the current year. Our Compensation Committee also considers matters, at various meetings throughout the year, related to individual compensation (such as compensation for new executive hires, which in 2020 included compensation for a new Chief Financial Officer), as well as high-level strategic compensation issues, such as the general efficacy of our compensation strategy, potential modifications to that strategy, retention and performance-specific compensation requirements and new trends, plans or approaches to compensation among our peer group or more generally. For executives other than our CEO, our Compensation Committee solicits and considers evaluations and recommendations of our CEO. For our CEO, our Compensation Committee conducts its own evaluation and makes compensation and incentive award adjustments accordingly. As part of its deliberations, our Compensation Committee will use the Board's annual evaluation of the CEO's performance and may review and consider materials such as financial reports and projections, operational data, tax and accounting information, total compensation that may become payable to executives, executive and director stock ownership information, company stock performance data, analyses of historical executive compensation levels and current Company-wide compensation
levels, and recommendations of our Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant, including analyses of executive and director compensation paid at other companies, as appropriate.
The specific determinations of our Compensation Committee with respect to executive compensation for 2020 are described in greater detail in the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 33.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of the Compensation Committee is currently, or has been at any time, one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last year, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Board or the Compensation Committee.
Compensation Committee Report (1)
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
H. Raymond Bingham
John H. Kispert
Wayne B. Lowell
_______________________
| |
(1) | The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing. |
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The primary functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include:
•review and evaluate the size, composition, function and duties of the Board consistent with its needs;
•recommend criteria for the selection of candidates to the Board and its committees, and identify individuals qualified to become Board members consistent with such criteria, including the consideration of nominees submitted by shareholders;
•recommend to the Board director nominees for election at the next annual or special meeting of shareholders at which directors are to be elected or to fill any vacancies or newly created directorships that may occur between such meetings;
•recommend directors for appointment to Board committees;
•make recommendations to the Board as to determinations of director independence;
•oversee the evaluation of the Board; and
•develop and recommend to the Board the Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for the Company and oversee compliance with such Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
Our Board has determined that each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent under the NYSE listing standards. The functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include:
reviewing periodically and evaluating director performance on the Board and its applicable committees, and recommending to the Board and management areas for improvement;
interviewing, evaluating, nominating and recommending individuals for membership on the Board;
reviewing and recommending to the Board any amendments to our corporate governance policies; and
reviewing and assessing, at least annually, the performance of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the adequacy of its charter.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has authority to engage legal counsel orand other experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. The Board has adopted a written Nominating and Corporate Governance CommitteeCommittee's authority, duties and responsibilities are described in its charter, thatwhich is reviewed annually and revised and updated as warranted. The charter is available to stockholders on ourin the Investor Relations section of the Company's website at http://investor.trinet.com/company/investors-relations/governance/documents-charters/default.aspx.
TheOur Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that candidates for director should have certain minimum qualifications, including the ability to read and understand basic financial statements, being over 21 yearsindependence and commitment to rigorously representing the long-term interests of age and having the highest personal integrity and ethics. TheCompany's stockholders. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also intends to considerconsiders such factors as possessing relevant expertise and experience upon which to be able to offer advice and guidance to management, having sufficient time to devote to our affairs, demonstrated excellence in his or hertheir field havingand the ability to exercise sound business judgment and having the commitment to rigorously represent the long-term interests of our stockholders. However, thejudgment. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee retains the right to modify these qualifications from time to time.qualifications. Candidates for director nominees are reviewed in the context of the current composition of theour Board, our operating requirements and the long-term interests of stockholders. In conducting this assessment, theour Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee typically considers diversity, age, skills and such other factors as it deems appropriate, given the current needs of theour Board and TriNet, to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and capability.
In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, theour Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews these directors’ overall service to TriNet during their terms, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance and any other relationships and transactions that
might impair the directors’ independence. In the case of new director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also determines whether the nominee issuch candidates are independent for NYSE purposes, which determination isdeterminations are made based upon applicable NYSE listing standards, applicable SEC rules and regulations and the advice of counsel, ifwhere necessary. TheOur Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee then uses its network of contacts to compile a list of potential candidates, but may also engage, if it deems appropriate, a professional search firm. TheOur Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts any appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates after considering the function and needs of theour Board.
The Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets to discuss and consider the candidates’ qualifications and then selects a nominee for recommendation to the Board by majority vote. In 2015, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee paid a fee to Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. to assist in the process of identifying or evaluating director candidates.
TheOur Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. TheOur Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not intend to alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates based on whether or not the candidate was recommended by a stockholder, including the minimum criteria set forth above. Stockholders who wish to recommend individuals for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to become nominees for election to theour Board may do so by delivering a written recommendation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee at the following address: 1100 San Leandro Blvd.,One Park Place, Suite 400, San Leandro,600, Dublin, California 94577.94568. Submissions must include the full name of the proposed nominee, a description of the proposed nominee’s business experience for at least the previous five years, complete biographical information, a description of the proposed nominee’s qualifications as a director and a representation that the nominating stockholder is a beneficial or record holder of our common stock and has been a holder for at least one year. Any such submission must be accompanied by the written consent of the proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held six meetings during 2020.
Risk Committee
The primary functions of the Risk Committee include:
•review the Company's Enterprise-wide Risk Management Policy and approach;
•oversee the operation of the Company's enterprise-wide risk management framework, processes and methodologies;
•review enterprise-level risk management objectives and monitor management's execution of such objectives;
•review management's reports on risk management processes, methodologies, controls and capabilities;
•review the Company's efforts to foster a culture of risk-adjusted decision-making without constraining reasonable risk-taking and innovation;
•review the adequacy of resources of the Company's risk management functions;
•monitor relevant trends and developments in the area of enterprise risk management and oversight;
•review the Company's risk profile against its tolerances, including significant risk exposure and risk trends, and the steps management has taken to monitor, control and report such risk exposures and trends;
•monitor the quality and effectiveness of the Company's technology security and periodically review, appraise and discuss with management the quality and effectiveness of the Company's information technology security, data privacy and disaster recovery capabilities;
•review, approve and monitor risk management actions for cases escalated to the Committee; and
•consider such other matters and perform such other actions as the Board or Committee deems necessary or advisable in relation to the Committee's risk-management oversight function.
Our Board has determined that each member of the Risk Committee is independent under the NYSE listing standards. The Risk Committee meets as often as it determines is appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. The Risk Committee has authority to engage advisers as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. The Risk Committee's authority, duties and responsibilities are described in its charter, which is reviewed annually and
revised and updated as warranted. The charter is available in the Investor Relations section of the Company's website at http://investor.trinet.com/company/investors-relations/governance/documents-charters/default.aspx. Our Risk Committee was newly formed in March 2021 and, as a result, did not hold any meetings in 2020.
Stockholder Communications with the Board
TheOur Board has adopted a Stockholder Communication Policy, which includes a formal process by which stockholders may communicate with the Board or any of its directors. This informationThe Stockholder Communication Policy is available on our website at http://investor.trinet.com/company/investors-relations/governance/documents-charters/default.aspx. Any interested person also may however, communicate directly with the presiding lead director or the independent or non-management directors. Persons interested in communicating directly with the independent or non-management directors regarding their concerns or issues are referred to the procedures for such communications onin our website.Stockholder Communication Policy.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Policy
TheOur Board has adopted a business ethics policyCode of Business Conduct and Ethics (the "Code") that applies to all of our corporate employees, executive officers and directors, including those executive officers responsible for financial reporting. Our business ethics policyCode is available on our website at http://investor.trinet.com/company/investors-relations/governance/documents-charters/default.aspx. We intend to disclose any amendments to this policy,Code, or any waivers of its requirements, on our website to the extent permitted or required by applicable SEC rules or stock exchange requirements.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
TheOur Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to assure that the Board will have the necessary authority and practices in place to review and evaluate our business operations as needed and to make decisions that are independent of our management. The guidelines are also intended to align the interests of directors and management with those of our stockholders. TheOur Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth the practices theour Board intends to follow with respect to board composition and selection, board responsibilities, board meetings and involvement of senior management, Chief Executive OfficerCEO performance evaluation and succession planning, and board committees and compensation. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website at http://investor.trinet.com/company/investors-relations/governance/documents-charters/default.aspx.
PROPOSAL 2
ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, andPursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking our stockholders are entitled to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, including in accordance with SEC rules.the section titled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" ("CD&A") beginning on page 33. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of all our Named Executive Officers and the executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. The compensation of our Named Executive Officers subject to the vote is disclosed inCD&A as well as the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, therelated compensation tables and the relatedaccompanying narrative disclosure contained in this Proxy Statement.disclosure.
Our executive compensation program is designed not only to retain and attract highly qualified and effective executives, but also to motivate them to substantially contribute to TriNet’s future success for the long-term benefit of stockholders and reward them for doing so. Accordingly, the Board and the Compensation Committee believe that there should be a strong relationship between pay and corporate performance (both financial results and stock price), and our executive compensation program reflects this belief. As described more fully in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 20 of this Proxy Statement, our Named Executive Officers are compensated in a manner consistent with our compensation philosophy and the policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. Some highlights, which are discussed further in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, of the consistency between the compensation of our Named Executive Officers and our compensation philosophy are as follows:
Annual incentive and long-term incentive compensation represent a significant portion of our executive compensation program. This variable compensation is “at risk” and directly dependent upon the achievement of pre-established corporate goals or stock price appreciation to align the interests of our executives with the interests of our stockholders. In 2015, 83% of our Chief Executive Officer’s total direct compensation consisted of variable, at-risk components. With respect to the other continuing Named Executive Officers, 74% – 90% of their 2015 total direct compensation consisted of variable, at-risk components.
Annual cash incentive bonuses for 2015 were tied to meeting challenging target levels for Net Service Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA, as well as individual management business objectives. Based upon the level of achievement of the corporate financial objectives and management business objectives, and the Compensation Committee’s discretion to reduce bonuses based on actual company financial performance, no bonuses were awarded to our Named Executive Officers or our Chief Executive Officer.
For 2015, the Compensation Committee included performance stock unit (“PSU”) awards in the mix of equity vehicles to be granted to our executive officers. These PSU awards were intended to represent one-third of each executive’s annual long-term incentive compensation award value in 2015. For additional details regarding our 2015 PSU awards to executives, see “Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards” on page 30 of this Proxy Statement.
WeBefore you vote, we urge you to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,CD&A, as well as the related compensation tables and the accompanying narrative disclosure contained in this Proxy Statement for detailed information on our executive compensation program, including our compensation philosophy, policies and practices, as well as the processes the Compensation Committee used to determine the design and amounts of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers in 2015.program.
TheOur Board believes that the information provided above and within the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the related compensation tables and the accompanying narrative disclosure contained in this Proxy Statement demonstrates that our executive compensation program is designed appropriatelystrikes an appropriate balance of long- and is working to ensure thatshort-term performance incentives, reinforces the link of executive pay and the Company's long-term performance, and aligns the interests of our Named Executive Officers are aligned with the intereststhose of our stockholders to support long-term value creation.
stockholders. Accordingly, theour Board is asking the stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as described in the CD&A in this Proxy Statement, by casting a non-binding advisory vote “FOR” the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to TriNet’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”
Because the vote is advisory, it is not binding on theour Board, our Compensation Committee or TriNet. Nevertheless, the views expressed by theour stockholders, whether through this vote or otherwise, are important to management and theour Board and, accordingly, theour Board and the Compensation Committee intend towill consider the results of this vote in making determinations in the future regarding our executive compensation arrangements.
Advisory approval of this proposal requires the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in personattending our 2021 Annual Meeting live or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at the 2016our 2021 Annual Meeting. Unless theour Board decides to modify its policy regarding the frequency of soliciting advisory votes on the compensation of our named executives,Named Executive Officers, after considering the results of the advisory vote of stockholders on Proposal 3 of this Proxy Statement, the next scheduled say-on-pay vote willis expected to be at the 20172022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE IN FAVOR OF PROPOSAL 2.2
PROPOSAL 3
ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF SOLICITATION OF ADVISORY STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act"), and Section 14A of the Exchange Act enable our stockholders, at least once every six years, to indicate their preference regarding how frequently we should solicit a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in our proxy statement. Following the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we have solicited the advisory vote of stockholders on our Named Executive Officers’ compensation annually.In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act, we are asking stockholders to indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote every year, every other year or every three years. Alternatively, stockholders may abstain from casting a vote.
After considering the benefits and consequences of each alternative, the Board recommends that the advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers be submitted to the stockholders once every year. In formulating its recommendation, the Board considered that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation will allow our stockholders to provide us with their direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement every year. Additionally, an annual advisory vote on executive compensation is consistent with our policy of seeking input from, and engaging in discussions with, stockholders on corporate governance matters and executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices.
While the Board believes that its recommendation is appropriate at this time, the stockholders are not voting to approve or disapprove that recommendation, but are instead asked to indicate their preferences, on an advisory basis, as to whether the non-binding advisory vote on the approval of our Named Executive Officer compensation practices should be held every year, every other year or every three years. The alternative among one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes from the holders of shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at the annual meeting will be deemed to be the frequency preferred by the stockholders. The Board is asking the stockholders to cast a non-binding advisory vote with respect to the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the Company's stockholders determine, on an advisory basis, the frequency with which the Company's stockholders shall have an advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company's Named Executive Officers, among the following choices:
Choice 1 - every year;
Choice 2 - every two years;
Choice 3 - every three years; or
Choice 4 - abstain from voting"
The Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of the stockholders in this matter and, to the extent there is any significant vote in favor of one frequency over the other options, even if less than a majority, the Board will consider the stockholders’ preference and evaluate any appropriate next steps. However, because this vote is advisory and, therefore, not binding on the Board or TriNet, the Board may decide that it is in the best interests of the stockholders that we hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option preferred by the stockholders. The vote will not be construed to create or imply any change or addition to the fiduciary duties of management or the Board.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE IN FAVOR OF "EVERY YEAR" ON PROPOSAL 3
PROPOSAL 4
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
TheOur Audit Committee has selected ErnstDeloitte & YoungTouche LLP (“ErnstDeloitte & Young”Touche”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015,2021, and has further directed that management submit the selection of its independent registered public accounting firm for ratification by theour stockholders at the 2016our 2021 Annual Meeting. ErnstDeloitte & YoungTouche has audited our financial statements since 1996.2017. Representatives of ErnstDeloitte & YoungTouche are expected to be present at the 2016our 2021 Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Neither our Bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of the selection of ErnstDeloitte & YoungTouche as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, the Audit Committee is submitting the selection of ErnstDeloitte & YoungTouche to theour stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, theour Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm.Deloitte & Touche. Even if the selection is ratified, theour Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of different independent auditors at any time during the year if they determine that such a change would be in the best interests of TriNet and our stockholders.
The Board is asking the stockholders to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as TriNet's independent registered public accounting firm and vote "FOR" the following resolution:
"RESOLVED, the stockholders hereby ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021."
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in personattending our 2021 Annual Meeting live or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at the 2016our 2021 Annual Meeting will be required to ratify the selection of ErnstDeloitte & Young.Touche.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
On May 6, 2016, our Audit Committee approved the engagement of Deloitte & Touche as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
The following table representssummarizes the aggregate fees billed and accrued for professional services provided by Deloitte & Touche during our fiscal years 2020 and 2019. These fees were approved pursuant to usthe pre-approval policies and procedures described below.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended December 31, |
| ($ in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 |
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 6,177 | | | $ | 6,908 | |
Audit-related Fees(2) | 67 | | | 40 | |
Tax Fees(3) | 236 | | | 139 | |
| | | |
All Other Fees(4) | 4 | | | 174 | |
| Total Fees | $ | 6,484 | | | $ | 7,261 | |
(1)Audit Fees included fees for 2015professional services rendered for the audits of the Company’s 2020 and 20142019 annual consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and reviews of the quarterly financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
(2)Audit-related Fees for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 consist of assurance and related services by Ernst & Young.the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the financial statements and are not reported under audit fees. Amounts include fees for services provided in connection with registration statements and merger and acquisition due diligence services.
(3)Tax Fees include fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, and other tax services.
(4)All Other Fees include fees for other audit and review engagements.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Fiscal Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | | (in thousands) |
Audit Fees(1) | | $ | 11,839 |
| | $ | 2,670 |
|
Audit-related Fees(2) | | 183 |
| | 1,826 |
|
Tax Fees(3) | | 1 |
| | 231 |
|
| Total Fees | | $ | 12,023 |
| | $ | 4,727 |
|
| |
(1) | Audit Fees included fees for professional services rendered for the audits of the Company’s 2015 and 2014 annual consolidated financial statements, and reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for 2015. |
| |
(2) | For 2014, Audit-related Fees included fees paid for services relating to our March 2014 initial public offering and September 2014 secondary public offering of common stock. For 2015, Audit-related Fees included due diligence services. |
| |
(3) | Tax fees include fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, and other tax services rendered in connection with the Company’s debt and equity financings. |
All fees described above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
TheOur Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm. TheThis policy generally requires pre-approval inof the specified services in the defined categories of audit services, audit-related services and tax services up to specified amounts.services. Pre-approval may also be given as part of theour Audit Committee’s approval of the scope of the engagement of the independent auditorregistered public accounting firm or on an individual, explicit, case-by-case basis before the independent auditorregistered public accounting firm is engaged to provide each service. The pre-approval of services may be delegated to one or more of theour Audit Committee’s members, but the decision must be reported to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
TheOur Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of services other than audit services by ErnstDeloitte & YoungTouche is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’sDeloitte & Touche's independence.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
A VOTE IN FAVOR OF PROPOSAL 3.4
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2016,2021, information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock by:
•each person, or group of affiliated persons, known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock;
•each of our Named Executive Officers as defined in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" on page 20 of this Proxy Statement;Officers;
•each of our directors and nominees for director; and
•all of our current executive officers and directors as a group.
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table below is c/o TriNet Group, Inc., 1100 San Leandro Blvd.,One Park Place, Suite 400, San Leandro,600, Dublin, California 94577.94568.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | Beneficial Ownership(1) |
| Beneficial Owner | | Number of Shares | | Percent of Total |
| 5% Holders: | | | | |
David C. Hodgson(2)(3) | | 20,436,181 |
| | 28.9 | % |
Funds Affiliated with General Atlantic(3) | | 20,091,312 |
| | 28.4 | % |
Wellington Management Group LLP(4) | | 6,347,817 |
| | 9.0 | % |
Cadian Capital Management(5) | | 6,205,020 |
| | 8.8 | % |
Martin Babinec(6) | | 5,092,760 |
| | 7.2 | % |
FMR, LLC(7) | | 3,943,036 |
| | 5.6 | % |
| Directors and Named Executive Officers: | | | | |
Katherine August-deWilde(8) | | 168,752 |
| | * |
|
Martin Babinec(6) | | 5,092,760 |
| | 7.2 | % |
H. Raymond Bingham(9) | | 385,799 |
| | * |
|
| Paul Chamberlain | | 1,756 |
| | * |
|
Burton M. Goldfield(10) | | 1,817,448 |
| | 2.6 | % |
Kenneth Goldman(11) | | 196,016 |
| | * |
|
Gregory L. Hammond(12) | | 208,428 |
| | * |
|
David C. Hodgson(2)(3) | | 20,436,181 |
| | 28.9 | % |
John H. Kispert(13) | | 108,506 |
| | * |
|
Wayne B. Lowell(14) | | 236,016 |
| | * |
|
Brady Mickelsen(15) | | 19,847 |
| | * |
|
William Porter(16) | | 1,001,746 |
| | 1.4 | % |
John Turner(17) | | 318,042 |
| | * |
|
All executive officers and directors as a group (14 persons)(18) | | 29,991,297 |
| | 42.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Beneficial Ownership(1) |
| Beneficial Owner | | Number of Shares | | Percent of Total |
| 5% Holders (other than Directors and Named Executive Officers): | | | | |
Atairos Group, Inc.(2) | | 21,472,863 | | | 32.6 | % |
Wellington Management Group LLC(3) | | 5,950,773 | | | 9.0 | % |
The Vanguard Group(4) | | 4,181,718 | | | 6.3 | % |
Cantillon Capital Management LLC(5) | | 4,009,377 | | | 6.1 | % |
ArrowMark Colorado Holdings, LLC(6) | | 3,368,498 | | | 5.1 | % |
| Directors: | | | | |
Michael J. Angelakis(7) | | 21,472,863 | | | 32.6 | % |
Katherine August-deWilde(8) | | 93,533 | | | * |
Martin Babinec(9) | | 3,232,153 | | | 4.9 | % |
H. Raymond Bingham(10) | | 124,413 | | | * |
Paul Chamberlain(11) | | 33,959 | | | * |
Ralph A. Clark(12) | | 59 | | | * |
Maria Contreras-Sweet(13) | | 921 | | | * |
Burton M. Goldfield(14) | | 700,650 | | | 1.1 | % |
Shawn Guertin(15) | | 5,984 | | | * |
David C. Hodgson(16) | | 116,627 | | | * |
Jacqueline Kosecoff(17) | | 5,984 | | | * |
Wayne B. Lowell(18) | | 106,091 | | | * |
| Non-Director Named Executive Officers: | | | | |
Edward Griese(19) | | 18,642 | | | * |
Olivier Kohler(20) | | 53,949 | | | * |
| Kelly Tuminelli | | — | | | * |
Samantha Wellington(21) | | 27,443 | | | * |
All executive officers and directors as a group (15 persons)(22) | | 25,974,629 | | | 39.3 | % |
| |
(1) | This table is based upon information supplied by executive officers, directors and certain principal stockholders and Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe that each of the stockholders named in this table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, applicable percentages are based on 70,718,423 shares outstanding on March 31, 2016, adjusted as required by rules promulgated by the SEC. Common stock subject to stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2016, or issuable upon settlement of restricted stock units within 60 days of March 31, 2016, is deemed to be outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the person holding these options or restricted stock units and the percentage ownership of any group of which the holder is a member but is not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. |
| |
(2) | Includes (i) the shares described in footnote 3 below, (ii) 60,000 shares issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2016 and (iii) 465 shares held by Mr. Hodgson's dependent. Mr. Hodgson disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares held by GA TriNet and HR Acquisitions except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. |
| |
(3) | Includes (i) 18,972,325 shares owned by GA TriNet, LLC (“GA TriNet”) and (ii) 1,118,987 shares owned by HR Acquisitions, LLC (“HR Acquisitions”). The members of GA TriNet are General Atlantic Partners 79, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“GAP 79”), General Atlantic Partners 84, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“GAP 84”), GAP-W, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“GAP-W”), |
GapStar, LLC,(1)This table is based upon information supplied by executive officers, directors and certain principal stockholders and Schedules 13D and 13G and Form 4s filed with the SEC. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe that each of the stockholders named in this table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, applicable percentages are based on 65,881,233 shares outstanding on March 31, 2021, adjusted as required by rules promulgated by the SEC. Common stock subject to stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021, or issuable upon settlement of RSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2021, is deemed to be outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the person holding these options or RSUs and the percentage ownership of any group of which the holder is a Delaware limited liability company (“GapStar”), GAP Coinvestments CDA,member but is not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person.
(2)Based on information supplied in a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on March 17, 2020 and a Form 4 filed with the SEC on March 26, 2021 reporting beneficial ownership of (i) 17,691,312 shares directly held by AGI-T, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“GAPCO CDA”), GAP Coinvestments III, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“GAPCO III”), GAP Coinvestments IV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“GAPCO IV”)(ii) 3,758,947 shares directly held by A-A SMA, L.P., and GAPCO GmbH & Co. KG, a German limited partnership (“GAPCO KG”). The members(iii) 22,604 shares directly held by Michael J. Angelakis that previously were issued to him upon the vesting of HR Acquisitions are GAP 84, GAP-W, GapStar, GAPCO CDA, GAPCO III, GAPCO IV and GAPCO KG (together with GAP 79, the “GA Funds”). General Atlantic GenPar, L.P. (“GA GenPar”)RSUs granted to Mr. Angelakis. A-T Holdings GP, LLC is the general partner of GAP 84AGI-T, L.P. Atairos Group, Inc. is the sole member and manager of A-T Holdings GP, LLC and the managersole limited partner of GAP-W. General AtlanticAGI-T, L.P. A-A SMA GP, LLC (“GA LLC”) is the general partner of GA GenPar,A-A SMA, L.P. Atairos Group, Inc. is the generalsole member and manager of A-A SMA GP, LLC and the sole limited partner of GAP 79 and GAPCO CDA andA-A SMA, L.P. Atairos Partners, L.P. is the managing membersole voting stockholder of GAPCO III and GAPCO IV. GAPCO Management GmbH (“Management GmbH”)Atairos Group, Inc. Atairos Partners GP, Inc. is the general partner of GAPCO KG.Atairos Partners, L.P. Mr. Angelakis is the Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer of Atairos Group, Inc. and directly or indirectly controls a majority of the voting power of Atairos Partners GP, Inc. Each of Mr. Angelakis, Atairos Group, Inc. and the other entities described above disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities described in clauses (i)-(iii) above except to the extent of its pecuniary interest therein. According to the Schedule 13D/A, the address for Atairos Group, Inc. is 40 Morris Avenue, c/o Atairos Management, L.P., Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 19010.
(3)Based on information jointly supplied by Wellington Management Group LLP, Wellington Group Holdings LLP, and Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP (collectively, "Wellington") and Wellington Management Company LLP in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 4, 2021. According to the Schedule 13G/A, Wellington has shared power to vote or direct the vote of up to 5,097,071 shares and shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of up to 5,950,773 shares as of December 31, 2020, and Wellington Management Company LLP has shared power to vote or direct the vote of up to 4,551,592 shares and shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of up to 4,988,972 shares as of December 31, 2020. According to the Schedule 13G/A, the address for Wellington is 280 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.
(4)Based on information supplied by The Managing DirectorsVanguard Group ("Vanguard") in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2021. According to the Schedule 13G/A, Vanguard has sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of GA4,052,916 shares as of December 31, 2020 and Vanguard has shared power to vote or direct the vote of 95,278 shares and shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 128,802 shares as of December 31, 2020. According to the Schedule 13G/A, the address for Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.
(5)Based on information jointly supplied by Cantillon Capital Management LLC, (the “GA Managing Directors”Cantillon Management L.P., Cantillon Inc. and William von Mueffling (collectively, "Cantillon") controlin a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2021. According to the Schedule 13G/A, Cantillon has shared power to vote or direct the vote of 3,120,489 shares and shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 4,009,377 shares, and Mr. von Mueffling has sole power to vote or direct the vote and to dispose or to direct the disposition of 345,000 shares as of December 31, 2020. According to the Schedule 13G/A, the address for Cantillon is 499 Park Avenue, 9th Floor, New York, New York 10022.
(6)Based on information supplied by ArrowMark Colorado Holdings, LLC ("ArrowMark") in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021. According to the Schedule 13G/A, ArrowMark has sole power to vote or direct the vote and to dispose or to direct the disposition of 3,368,498 shares as of December 31, 2020. According to the Schedule 13G/A, the address for ArrowMark is 100 Fillmore Street, Suite 325, Denver, Colorado 80206.
(7)Includes the shares described in footnote 2 above.
(8)Reflects 93,533 shares held by the DeWilde Family Trust dated June 21, 1990, for which Ms. August-deWilde shares voting and investment decisions madepower.
(9)Based on information supplied in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2021 and a Form 4 filed with the SEC on March 26, 2021 reporting beneficial ownership of (i) 2,535,196 shares held by GAPCO KGMartin and Management GmbH.Krista Babinec, Trustees of The GA Managing Directors are Steven Denning (Chairman), William E. Ford (Chief Executive Officer), John Bernstein, J. Frank Brown, Gabriel Caillaux, Andrew Crawford, Mark Dzialga, Cory Eaves, Martin Escobari, Patricia Hedley, Rene Kern, Jonathan Korngold, Christopher Lanning, Jeff Leng, Anton Levy, Adrianna Ma, Thomas Murphy, Sandeep Naik, Andrew Pearson, Brett Rochkind, David Rosenstein, Philip Trahanas, Robbert Vorhoff andBabinec Family Trust, for which Mr. Hodgson, who is a member of the Board. Certain GA Managing Directors are the members of GapStar. GA TriNet, HR Acquisitions, GAP 79, GAP 84, GAP-W, GAPCO III, GAPCO IV, GAPCO CDA, GAPCO KG, GapStar, Management GmbH, GA GenPar and GA LLC are a “group” within the meaning of Rule 13d-5 of the Exchange Act. The GA Managing Directors may be deemed to shareBabinec has sole voting and dispositiveinvestment power, with respect to(ii) 531,369 shares and interests held by the GA Funds. The GA Funds control GA TriNet and HR Acquisitions by virtue of their ownership of all of the interests of GA TriNet and HR Acquisitions. Consequently, GA TriNet and HR Acquisitions, the GA Funds, GA LLC and GA Managing Directors may, from time to time, consult among themselves and coordinate theBabinec 2008 Children’s Trust, for which Mr. Babinec shares voting and disposition of theinvestment power, (iii) 134,140 shares held by GA TriNetUpMobility Foundation Inc. (fka Babinec Foundation, Inc.), for which Mr. Babinec has sole voting and HR Acquisitions. The mailing addressinvestment power, and (iv) 31,448 shares held by William and Elizabeth Babinec Family Charity Trust, for which Mr. Babinec has sole voting and investment power.
(10)Includes (i) 109,413 shares held by H. Raymond Bingham Living Trust, and (ii) 15,000 shares issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021.
(11)Reflects 33,959 shares owned directly.
(12)Reflects 59 shares owned directly.
(13)Reflects 921 shares owned directly.
(14)Includes (i) 10,302 shares owned directly, (ii) 472,254 shares held by Burton M. Goldfield and Maud Carol Goldfield, Trustees of the foregoing General Atlantic entities is c/o General Atlantic Service Company, LLC, 55 East 52nd Street, 32nd Floor, New York, NY 10055. The mailing addressBurton M. and Maud Carol Goldfield Trust u/a/d 12/6/00, for which Mr. Goldfield shares voting and investment power, (iii) 207,363 shares issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days of GAPCO KGMarch 31, 2021 and Management GmbH is c/o General Atlantic GmbH, Maximilianstrasse 35b, 80539 Munich, Germany.(iv) 10,731 shares issuable upon settlement of RSUs and restricted stock awards ("RSAs") within 60 days of March 31, 2021.
| |
(4) | Based on information supplied by Wellington Management Group, LLP in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2016. According to the Schedule 13G, Wellington Management Group, LLP, is an investment adviser and the securities are owned by its clients, and Wellington Management Group, LLP has shared power to vote or direct the vote of 5,590,388 shares and shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of all 6,347,817 shares as of December 31, 2015. The address of Wellington Capital Management Company, LLP is 280 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02210. |
| |
(5) | Based on information supplied by Cadian Capital Management, LP in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016. Cadian Capital Management, LP has shared power to vote or direct the vote and shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of all 6,205,020 shares as of December 31, 2015. The address of Cadian Capital Management, LP is 535 Madison Avenue, 36th Floor, New York, New York, 10022. |
| |
(6) | Includes (i) 4,217,036 shares held by Martin and Krista Babinec, Trustees of The Babinec Family Trust, for which Mr. Babinec has sole voting and investment power, (ii) 855,724 shares held by the Babinec 2008 Children’s Trust, for which Mr. Babinec shares voting and investment power and (iii) 20,000 shares held by Babinec Foundation, Inc., for which Mr. Babinec has sole voting and investment power. |
| |
(7) | Based on information supplied by FMR, LLC in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016. FMR, LLC has sole power to vote or direct the vote of 33,100 shares and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of all 3,943,036 shares as of December 31, 2015. The address of FMR, LLC is 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02210. |
| |
(8) | Includes (i) 3,336 shares issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2016 and (ii) 165,416 shares held by DeWilde Family Trust dated June 21, 1990, for which Ms. August-deWilde shares voting and investment power. |
| |
(9) | Includes (i) 90,000 shares issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2016 and (ii) 295,799 shares held by the Raymond and Kristin Bingham Revocable Trust u/a/d 9/16/04, for which Mr. Bingham shares voting and investment power. |
| |
(10) | Includes (i) 269,351 shares issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2016, (ii) 10,793 restricted stock units which vest within 60 days after March 31, 2016 (iii) 1,312,990 shares held by Burton M. Goldfield and Maud Carol Goldfield, Trustees of the Burton M. and Maud Carol Goldfield Trust u/a/d 12/6/00, for which Mr. Goldfield shares voting and investment power and (iv) 150,000 shares held by Burton M. Goldfield and Carol Maud Goldfield, Trustees of the Alec Thunder Goldfield 2011 Irrevocable Trust, for which Mr. Goldfield shares voting and investment power. |
| |
(11) | Includes (i) 60,000 shares issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2016 and (ii) 136,016 shares held by the Goldman-Valeriote Family Trust dated 11/15/95, for which Mr. Goldman shares voting and investment power. |
| |
(12) | Mr. Hammond retired from TriNet in June 2015. The information presented is based on information known at the time of Mr. Hammond's retirement in June 2015, which includes 208,428 shares held by the Gregory Lewis Hammond Living Trust, for which Mr. Hammond has sole voting and investment power. |
| |
(13) | Includes (i) 39,990 shares issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2016 and (ii) 68,516 shares held by the Kispert Family Trust, for which Mr. Kispert shares voting and investment power. |
| |
(14) | Includes (i) 20,000 shares issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2016 and (ii) 216,016 shares held by the Wayne and Nan Lowell Revocable Trust dated February 2, 1991, for which Mr. Lowell shares voting and investment power. |
| |
(15) | Includes 4,924 restricted stock units which vest within 60 days after March 31, 2016. |
| |
(16) | Includes (i) 104,000 shares in each of three irrevocable trusts, for a total of 312,000 shares, for which Mr. Porter has sole voting and investment power, (ii) 146,420 shares issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2016 and (iii) 2,325 restricted stock units which vest within 60 days after March 31, 2016. |
| |
(17) | Includes (i) 205,219 shares issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2016, (ii) 3,739 restricted stock units which vest within 60 days after March 31, 2016 and (iii) 109,084 shares held by the Turner 2000 Revocable Trust, for which Mr. Turner shares voting and investment power. |
| |
(18) | Consists of (i) 29,075,200 shares held by the directors and executive officers, (ii) 894,316 shares issuable pursuant to stock options held by such persons that are exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2016 and (iii) 21,781 restricted stock units held by such persons that will vest within 60 days after March 31, 2016. |
(15)Reflects 5,984 shares owned directly.
18(16)Reflects 116,627 shares owned directly.
(17)Reflects 5,984 shares held by Robert H. Brook and Jacqueline B. Kosecoff Family Trust, for which Dr. Kosecoff shares voting and investment power.
(18)Includes (i) 20,000 shares issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021 and (ii) 86,091 shares held by the Wayne and Nan Lowell Revocable Trust dated February 2, 1991, for which Mr. Lowell shares voting and investment power.
(19)Includes (i) 1,499 shares issuable upon settlement of RSUs and RSAs within 60 days of March 31, 2021 and (ii) 17,143 shares owned directly.
(20)Includes (i) 6,536 shares issuable upon settlement of RSUs and RSAs within 60 days of March 31, 2021 and (ii) 47,413 shares owned directly.
(21)Includes (i) 3,975 shares issuable upon settlement of RSUs within 60 days of March 31, 2021 and (ii) 23,468 shares owned directly.
(22)Consists of (i) 25,711,024 shares held by the directors and executive officers, (ii) 242,363 shares issuable pursuant to stock options held by such persons that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2021 and (iii) 21,242 shares issuable upon settlement of RSUs and RSAs within 60 days of March 31, 2021.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE16(a) REPORTS
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to2020, our officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with except that (i) in a Form 4 that was filed by Mr. Hodgson on October 15, 2015 (otherwise timely disclosing transactions in our common stock), he disclosed that his dependent disposed 35 shares of our common stock on September 4, 2015, which disclosure was inadvertently not reported at the time of sale and (ii) in a Form 4 that was filed by Mr. Kispert on February 9, 2016, he disclosed the transfer of 62,500 shares of our common stock on December 17, 2014 to the Kispert Family Trust, which disclosure was inadvertently not reported at the time of the transfer.all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain formation with respect toBiographies for our executive officers, other than our CEO and director, Mr. Goldfield, as of March 31, 2016.April 14, 2021, appear below. Biographical information with regard to Mr. Goldfield is presented under “Proposal No. 1-Election of Directors” in this Proxy Statement.
| | | | | |
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | Olivier Kohler Olivier Kohler, age 58, has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since May 2020, as our Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from March 2019 to April 2020 and as our Senior Vice President and Chief Operations Officer from April 2018 to March 2019. Prior to joining TriNet, Mr. Kohler served as Chief Operating Officer at Bridgewater Associates, an investment management firm, from January 2016 to July 2017. Prior to this, Mr. Kohler served as Chief Administrative Officer and Senior Vice President at Cisco Systems, a worldwide technology company, from November 2010 to December 2015. Before joining Cisco Systems, Mr. Kohler served in various roles of increasing responsibility over the course of nearly 28 years at Hewlett Packard, a multinational information technology company, most recently as Global Head of Enterprise Strategic Alliances. Mr. Kohler holds degrees in Accounting & Computer Science, as well as Business Management, from École Supérieure de Commerce in Switzerland. |
| | | | | |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | Kelly Tuminelli Kelly Tuminelli, age 52, was hired as Executive Vice President of Finance for TriNet on September 8, 2020, and assumed the role of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on October 26, 2020. Prior to joining TriNet, Ms. Tuminelli held the role of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Genworth Financial, Inc. located in Richmond, Virginia. Prior to Genworth, Ms. Tuminelli held several finance roles within the General Electric Company, after starting her career with PriceWaterhouseCoopers, LLP in Seattle, Washington. Ms. Tuminelli holds a B.A. in Business Administration from the University of Washington, and is a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and a Chartered Global Management Accountant (CGMA). |
| | | | | |
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary | Samantha Wellington Samantha Wellington, age 43, has served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since November 2018 and previously served as our Vice President and Associate General Counsel from October 2016 to November 2018. Prior to joining TriNet, Ms. Wellington held various senior legal positions at Oracle Corporation, a multinational computer technology corporation, over a 12-year period, including Managing Counsel for Oracle’s Corporate, Securities & Acquisitions Legal Team from January 2009 to October 2016 and Senior Legal Counsel for Oracle’s Asia Pacific and Japan division from November 2005 to January 2009. She also served Oracle’s interests on the board of directors of Oracle’s publicly traded subsidiaries in Japan and India from June 2013 to October 2016, and from April 2013 to October 2016, respectively. Ms. Wellington holds both a Bachelor of Creative Arts and a Bachelor of Laws from Wollongong University, as well as a Master of Laws in Communication and Technology Law from the University of New South Wales. She is admitted to practice law in both NSW, Australia and California, USA. |
Compensation Committee Report(1)
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
| | | | | |
| Katherine August-deWilde |
| Michael J. Angelakis |
| H. Raymond Bingham |
| Jacqueline Kosecoff |
(1) The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Named Executive Officers
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the "CD&A") describes our executive compensation philosophy, policies objectives and practices during 2020, the material elements of our executive compensation program, and the executive compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2020 and the key factors that contributed to those decisions. This discussion focuses primarily on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers in 2020, but also includes important compensation changes approved for our senior executives generally in 2020. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, our NEOs were:
| | | | | | | | |
| Name | Age | Position(s) |
| | Title |
| Burton M. Goldfield | 60 | President and Chief Executive Officer and Director(“CEO”) (our principal executive officer) |
William PorterKelly Tuminelli(1) | 61 | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") (our principal financial officer) |
| Olivier Kohler | | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
| Samantha Wellington | | Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer |
Edward Griese(2) | 53 | Senior Vice President of Insurance Services |
Brady MickelsenRichard Beckert(3) | 45 | Former Senior Vice President and Chief LegalFinancial Officer and Secretary |
John TurnerMichael P. Murphy(4) | 51 | Former Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer |
Barrett Boston(5) | | Former Senior Vice President of Salesand Chief Revenue Officer |
William Porterhas served as(1) Ms. Tuminelli became our Chief Financial Officer since August 2010. Prior to joining us,on October 26, 2020.
(2) On March 24, 2021, in connection with an internal restructuring, the Board determined that Mr. Porter was most recently at Cadence Design Systems, Inc., a computer-aided design company, where heGriese is no longer an "executive officer" as defined under the Exchange Act. Mr. Griese's title and other duties and responsibilities remain unaffected by this determination.
(3) Mr. Beckert served in a series of executive roles over a 15-year period, includingas Chief Financial Officer until May 15, 2020, and separated employment from 1999 to 2008 and Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer from April 2008 to October 2008. Prior to Cadence,the Company on the same day.
(4) Mr. Porter spent six years at Apple Inc., where he held various accounting, reporting and operational roles. He began his career at Arthur Andersen, where he served small and medium-sized businesses and high-tech clients and gained experience in accounting, audits, business consulting and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Porter holds a B.S. in Accounting and an M.B.A. in Finance, both from UC Berkeley.
Edward GriesehasMurphy served as our Senior Vice President of Insurance Services since February 2016. Prior to joining us, from 2014 to 2015, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Health First Health Plans, Inc., a subsidiary of Health First, Inc., providing multiple commercial and Medicare health plans for Health First’s fully integrated health system in Central Florida. Prior to Health First, from 2012 to 2014, Mr. Griese was Managing Director and Partner of Alvarez & Marsal, a leading global professional services firm focused on performance improvement and business advisory services. From 2004 to 2012, Mr. Griese worked for Munich Re Group, one of the world’s largest reinsurers, in various roles, most recently as President of Munich Health North America. Prior to that, he served as Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer of Paramount Health, a subsidiary of Munich Re in Mumbai. Mr. Griese has also held executive positions for Cigna International, a global health insurance services company and UnitedHealthcare International, a provider of health solutions for globally mobile employees, based in Munich. Mr. Griese holds a B.A. in Accounting from Gustavus Adolphus College.
Brady Mickelsenhas served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since June 2015. Prior to joining us, Mr. Mickelsen was an M&A/corporate partner at White & Case LLP from 2010 to 2015. From 2005 to 2010, Mr. Mickelsen was Vice President and Associate General Counsel at Oracle Corporation, where he was responsible for the corporate, securities and acquisitions group within the legal department. Mr. Mickelsen holds a B.A. in Public Policy from Stanford University and a J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School.
John Turner has served as our Senior Vice President of Sales since April 2012. From 2011 to 2012, Mr. Turner was Vice President of American Sales at FalconStor Software, Inc., a provider of data protection and storage virtualization solutions. From 2004 to 2011, Mr. Turner also served as the Vice President of Sales for Symantec Corporation, a security software company. Mr. Turner joined
Symantec in connection with its acquisition of VERITAS, where he served as the Senior Director for Western U.S., Emerging Solutions. Prior to joining VERITAS, he was Vice President of Sales for Gartner CIO Programs. Mr. Turner holds a B.S. in Marketing with a minor in International Relations from Santa Clara University and an M.B.A. from San Jose State University.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information regarding the 2015 compensation of our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, the two executive officers (other than our principal executive officer and principal financial officer) who were our most highly-compensated executive officers as of the end of 2015, and the one additional executive officer who would have been one of the three most highly compensated executive officers (other than our principal executive officer and principal financial officer) but for the fact that the person was not an executive officer at the end of the last completed fiscal year. These executive officers were our Named Executive Officers (the “Named Executive Officers”) for 2015:
Burton M. Goldfield, our President and Chief Executive Officer (our “CEO”);
William Porter, our Vice President andInterim Chief Financial Officer (our “CFO”);of the Company from May 15, 2020 to October 25, 2020, and separated employment from the Company on December 28, 2020.
Brady Mickelsen,(5) Mr. Boston separated employment from the Company on December 7, 2020.
These NEOs, together with the other members of our senior executive management whose compensation is determined by our Compensation Committee, are referred to as our “Senior Executive Management”.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our Compensation Committee regularly reviews the elements of the individual compensation packages for our Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary (our “Chief Legal Officer”);
John Turner,Executive Management. When making its compensation decisions for our Senior Vice President, Sales; and
Greg Hammond, who retired fromExecutive Management, our Compensation Committee takes into consideration our Company’s performance for prior years, competitive market data,our CEO's recommendations, with the exception of his position as Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, effective June 21, 2015.
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of our executiveown compensation, program during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. It also provides an overview of our executive compensation philosophy, as well as our principal compensation policiesthe additional factors described in “Oversight and practices. Finally, it analyzes how and why the Compensation CommitteeDesign of our BoardCompensation Program-Role of Directors (the “CompensationCompensation Committee”) arrived at the specific compensation decisions for the Named Executive Officers in 2015, and discusses the key factors that the Compensation Committee considered in determining the compensation of our executive officers.
Business Overview
TriNet Group Inc., or TriNet or the Company, is a leading provider of comprehensive human resources, or HR, solutions for small to midsize businesses, under a co-employment model. Our HR solutions are designed to manage an increasingly complex set of HR regulations, costs, risks and responsibilities for our clients, allowing them to focus on operating and growing their core businesses. Our bundled HR solutions include offerings such as:
multi-state payroll processing and tax administration;
employee benefits programs, including health insurance and retirement plans;
workers compensation insurance and claims management;
federal, state and local labor, employment and benefit law compliance;
risk mitigation, including employment practices claims management;
expense and time management; and
human capital consulting. below.
Our proprietary, cloud-based HR software systems are used by our clients and their employees, whom we refer to as worksite employees, to efficiently store and manage their core HR-related information and conduct a variety of HR-related transactions anytime and anywhere.
In addition, our expert teams of in-house HR professionals also provide additional services upon request to support various stages of our clients' growth, including talent management, recruiting and training, performance management consulting or other consulting services (with an incremental charge for such services).
As of December 31, 2015, we served over 12,700 clients in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Canada, co-employed more than 324,000 worksite employees and had processed over $31 billion in payroll and payroll tax payments for clients on our systems in 2015. Our clients are distributed across a variety of industries, including technology, life sciences, not-for-profit, professional services, financial services, property management, retail, manufacturing, and hospitality. Our sales and marketing, client services and product development teams are increasingly focused on specific industry verticals. This verticalized approach gives us a deeper understanding of the HR needs facing small to midsize businesses in particular industries, which better enables us to provide HR solutions and services tailored to the specific needs of clients in these verticals.
2015 Business Highlights
In 2015, we saw increased adoption of our HR solutions across our target markets. These accomplishments were reflected in the following financial results for 2015:
Total revenues were $2.7 billion, representing a 21% increase compared to $2.2 billion in fiscal 2014;
Total worksite employees as of December 31, 2015 increased 13% from December 31, 2014, to approximately 324,000;
Net Service Revenues (as defined below under “Annual Cash Incentive Compensation”) were $546.9 million, representing a 8% increase compared to $507.2 million in fiscal 2014;
Adjusted EBITDA (as defined below under “Annual Cash Incentive Compensation”) was $151.3 million, representing an 8% decrease compared to $165.3 million in fiscal 2014; and
Net income was $31.7 million, or $0.44 per diluted share, compared to net income of $15.5 million, or $0.22 per diluted share, in fiscal 2014.
2015Senior Executive Compensation Actions
The focus of our executive compensation program is to target cash compensation levels and to align our long-term incentive compensation awards with our business objectives and the creation of long-term stockholder value. To accomplish the purposes of our compensation program, the Compensation Committee monitors the various compensation components and makes determinations on the appropriate approach based on then-available information and as circumstances require.
For example, in 2015, the Compensation Committee determined that it was in our best interests to shift from our practice of granting equity awards solely in the form of stock options to a more balanced mix of equity vehicles, including time-based equity awards and performance-based equity awards linked to our revenue growth targets over a three-year period. Based on the information available at the time, the Compensation Committee concluded that this approach was consistent with our objectives of aligning the interests of the Named Executive Officers with our business objectives and the creation of long-term value for our stockholders. The Compensation Committee will continue to review the appropriate mix of equity as part of its evaluation of our compensation philosophy and program objectives as circumstances require.
The Compensation Committee and, in the case of our CEO, the independent members of our Board of Directors, took the following 2015 compensation actions for the Named Executive Officers:
Adjusted the annual base salary and bonus opportunities of our CEO and each of the other Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Mickelsen and Mr. Hammond), based on their individual performance, with the goal of providing total target cash compensation that is competitive with that of similarly situated executives at companies that are comparable to us. Mr. Mickelsen joined us in June 2015 and, therefore, did not receive an adjustment to his base salary or bonus opportunities in 2015. Mr. Hammond retired from TriNet in June 2015 and did not receive any adjustment to his base salary or bonus opportunities in 2015;
Awarded no annual bonuses to our CEO or any of our other Named Executive Officers for 2015, based upon the level of achievement of the corporate financial objectives and management business objectives, and utilizing the Compensation Committee’s discretion to further reduce bonuses based on individual and company financial performance; and
Awarded a mix of PSU awards, restricted stock units ("RSU") awards and stock options to the Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Mickelsen and Mr. Hammond), with PSUs, RSUs and stock options each representing one-third of each executive officer's annual long-term incentive compensation award value. Mr. Mickelsen received RSUs and stock options as part of his new hire grant when he joined us in June 2015. Mr. Hammond retired from TriNet in June 2015 and did not receive any equity awards in 2015. For more information about the terms of the PSU awards granted to the Named Executive Officers in 2015, see “Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards” on page 30 of this Proxy Statement.
Executive Compensation-Related Policies and Practices
We endeavor to maintain sound executive compensation policies and practices, including compensation-related corporate governance standards, consistent with our executive compensation philosophy. During 2015, we maintained the following executive compensation policies and practices to drive performance and either prohibit or minimize behaviors that we do not believe serve our stockholders’ long-term interests:
What We Do
The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directors who have established effective means for communicating with our stockholders regarding their executive compensation ideas and concerns.
The Compensation Committee is authorized to engage and retain its own advisors. During 2015, the Compensation Committee engaged Compensia, Inc. to assist with its responsibilities. Other than with respect to its engagement by the Compensation Committee, Compensia performs no consulting or other services for us.
The Compensation Committee conducts an annual review of our executive compensation strategy, including a review of the compensation peer group used for comparative purposes, and, to help avoid creating any risks that would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us, an annual review of our compensation-related risk profile.
The Compensation Committee designs the equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officers and our other employees to vest or be earned over multi-year periods, which is consistent with current market practice, and is consistent with our long-term value creation goals and retention objectives.
The Compensation Committee provides modest amounts of perquisites and other personal benefits to the Named Executive Officers which serve a sound business purpose.
The Compensation Committee requires that all change-in-control payments and benefits are based on a “double-trigger” arrangement (that is, they first require both a change-in-control of our Company and a qualifying termination of employment before a Named Executive Officer is eligible to receive any such payments and benefits).
The Company prohibits our employees, executive officers and members of our Board of Directors from the trading of put or call options or short sales in our equity securities or engaging in any other hedging transactions with respect to our equity securities. In addition, we prohibit our employees, executive officers and members of our Board of Directors from pledging their equity securities or using such securities as collateral for a loan.
The Board of Directors reviews the risks associated with our executive officer and other senior personnel positions on a regular basis so that we have an adequate succession strategy and plans are in place for our most critical positions.
What We Do Not Do
The Company does not offer pension arrangements, defined benefit retirement plans, or nonqualified deferred compensation plans to the Named Executive Officers.
The Company does not provide any tax reimbursement payments or “gross-ups” in connection with any severance or change-in-control payments to the Named Executive Officers.
Compensation Philosophy, Objectives and Design
Compensation Philosophy
We operate in a highly competitive, rapidly evolving industry. To succeed in this environment, we must attract and retain a highly talented executive team, including executive officers with strong leadership skills who can run our business functions, achieve results that meet our clients’ objectives, and sell our services. We have designed our executive compensation program to accomplish these goals, while at the same time fostering a “pay for performance” environment that aligns the long-term interests of the Named Executive Officers with the interests of our stockholders.
Compensation Program Objectives
Our executiveManagement compensation program is designed to:to achieve the following objectives:
attract•Attract, Retain and Motivate. Attract and retain highly talented and experienced executive officers,executives who possess the knowledge, skills, and leadership criteriathat are critical to our success;
success and motivate these executive officersthose executives to achieve our strategic business objectives and uphold our core values;values.
•Promote Teamwork and Individual Performance. Promote executive teamwork within the executive team,through shared strategic goals, while also recognizing and rewarding the unique role each executive officer plays in our success;success by measuring individual performance.
•Link Compensation with Performance and Strategic Goals. Tie executive compensation to overall Company performance and the achievement of strategic goals.
ensure the alignment of•Align Executive and Stockholder Interests. Align the long-term interests and objectives of our executive officersexecutives with the intereststhose of our stockholders.
As a newly-public company, we willOur Compensation Committee regularly reviews our Senior Executive Management compensation program to ensure that the program’s components continue to evaluatealign with the above objectives and that the program is administered in a manner consistent with our established compensation philosophypolicies and program objectives as circumstances require. We expect thephilosophy.
Executive Compensation Policies and Practices
The Compensation Committee to reviewoversees our executive compensation program, policies and relatedpractices. These policies and practices, which are designed to link compensation and performance and either minimize or prohibit behaviors that are not aligned with our stockholders’ long-term interests, are as appropriate, to ensure that they reinforce our annualfollows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| What We Do | | | What We Don’t Do |
| þ | Pay for Performance. In 2020, 53% of the target total direct cash and equity compensation for our CEO and an average of 44% of the target total cash and equity direct compensation for our other NEOs was performance-based. For more details, see the charts in the section titled "Compensation Mix" in the CD&A. | | ý | No Guaranteed Salary Increases or Bonuses. Our Senior Executive Management is not guaranteed salary increases or bonuses for any year. |
| þ | Independent Advisor. Since 2012, the Compensation Committee has engaged Compensia to provide analysis, advice and guidance on executive compensation matters. | | ý
| No Hedging, Pledging or Short Sales. Our employees, executive officers, and directors are prohibited from making put or call options or short sales of Company securities, engaging in hedging transactions involving Company securities, and pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan. |
| þ | Independent Committees. Each of our Board committees is comprised solely of independent directors. | | ý
| No Excise Tax Gross-ups. Our Senior Executive Management does not receive tax “gross-ups” in connection with severance or change in control arrangements. |
þ
| Annual Peer-Based Review. The Compensation Committee, assisted by Compensia, annually reviews our executive compensation program against the competitive market using a group of peer companies as a reference. | | ý
| No Pension Plans. Our Senior Executive Management is not entitled to pension arrangements, defined benefit retirement plans, or nonqualified deferred compensation plans. |
þ
| Stock Ownership Guidelines. In 2017, our Board adopted and has subsequently amended equity ownership guidelines for our officers subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the members of our Board. | | ý
| No Supplemental Executive Retirement. Our Senior Executive Management is not entitled to supplemental executive retirement benefits. |
þ
| Compensation Recovery ("Clawback") Policy. In 2017, our Board adopted and subsequently amended in 2020 a compensation recovery (“clawback”) policy under which we may seek reimbursement of cash incentive payments made to our NEOs and other current and former officers subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act in certain circumstances. | | ý
| No "Single-trigger" Change in Control Provisions. Our change in control benefits and plans are based on a “double-trigger” arrangement. |
Oversight and long-term objectives and to ensure that we are able to attract, reward, and retain the highly-talented executive team that is critical to our success.
Compensation Program Design
The Named Executive Officers receive total compensation opportunities consisting primarily of a combination of:
base salary;
annual cash incentive compensation; and
long-term equity incentive awards.
The Named Executive Officers also participate in the standard employee benefit plans available to most of our U.S. employees, and receive a small amount of additional benefits and perquisite reimbursements. In addition, the Named Executive Officers are eligible for certain post-employment (severance and change in control) payments and benefits under certain circumstances.Compensation Program
Compensation-Setting Process
Role of Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee oversees our executive compensation and otherSenior Executive Management compensation and benefit programs, administers our equity compensation plans, and annually reviews and approves annually the compensation decisions relating toaffecting our Senior Executive Management, with the Namedassistance of its independent compensation consultant, Compensia.
In making its 2020 Senior Executive Officers and other senior personnel.
For 2015,Management compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee reviewed our executiveconsidered the following factors:
•the compensation program,analysis provided by Compensia, including our incentive compensation plans and arrangements to ensure that they were appropriate, properly coordinated, and able to achieve their intended purposes. Further, the Compensation Committee reviewedrelevant competitive market trends and changes in competitive compensation practices, as further described below. Based on its review and assessment, the Compensation Committee, from time to time, may approve changes in our executive compensation program.data;
The factors considered by the Compensation Committee in determining executive compensation for 2015 included:
•the recommendations of our CEO (except with respect to his own compensation);
•our corporate growth and other elements of financial performance;
•the individual achievement of each executive officerSenior Executive Management team member against the executive officer’stheir management objectives;
a review of the relevant competitive market data (as described below);
•performance levels, including consistent exceptional performance;
•retention risk;
•the expected future contribution of the individual executive officer;Senior Executive Management team member;
•internal pay equity based on the impact on our business and performance;
•the executive officer’sSenior Executive Management team member’s existing equity awards and stock holdings; and
•the potential dilutive effect of new equity awards on our stockholders.
The Compensation Committee considered these factors both when making decisions with respect to individual pay elements and with respect to total compensation opportunities. The Compensation Committee has not adopted artificial limits with respect to any compensation component and will continue to strive to create compensation terms as needed to attract and retain executive talent to the Company. The Compensation Committee does not weight these factors in any predetermined manner, nor does it apply any formulas in making its compensation decisions. The members of the Compensation Committee consider all of this informationthese factors in light of their individual experience, knowledge of our Company, knowledge of the competitive market, knowledge of each Namedour Senior Executive Officer,Management and business judgment in making decisions regarding executive compensation and our executiveSenior Executive Management compensation program.
The Compensation Committee’s authority, duties, and responsibilities are described in its charter, which will be reviewed annually and revised and updated as warranted. The charter is available in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at http://investor.trinet.com/company/investors-relations/governance/documents-charters/default.aspx.
Role of Management
Our CEO works closely with the Compensation Committee in determining the compensation of the Namedour Senior Executive Officers and certain other senior personnel.Management (other than his own). Our CEO reviews the performance of the Namedother Senior Executive OfficersManagement and these other senior personnel, and then shares those evaluations and makes recommendations towith the Compensation Committee and its compensation consultant, Compensia, and then makes recommendations for each element of compensation.
Our CEO also works with our CFO, Chief Legal OfficerCLO and Senior Vice President of Human Resources Department to recommend the structure of our long-term incentive programs, and to identify and develop corporate and individual performance objectives for such plans and to evaluate actual performance against the selected measures.objectives. Our CEO also makes recommendations on new hire compensation packages of our Named Executive Officers and certain other senior personnel.for potential new executives.
While theThe Compensation Committee solicits and considers our CEO’s recommendations (except with respect to his individual compensation), it onlyand uses these recommendations as one of several factors in making its decisions with respect to the compensation of the Namedour Senior Executive Officers and other senior personnel.Management. In all cases, the final decisionsdecision on NEO compensation matters areis made by the Compensation Committee. Moreover, no Named Executive OfficerNEO or other employee participates in the determination of the amounts or elements of such individual’s own compensation.
At the request of the Compensation Committee, our CEO typically attends a portion of each Compensation Committee meeting, including meetings at which the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant is present.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
Pursuant to its charter, theThe Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to retain the services of one or more external advisors, including compensation consultants, legal counsel, accounting, and other advisors, to assist it in performance of its duties and responsibilities. The Compensation Committee makes all determinations regarding the engagement, fees and services of these external advisors, and any such external advisor reports directly to the Compensation Committee.
During 2015,In 2020, the Compensation Committee engaged Compensia Inc. to assist it in connection with its review, analysis and determinations with respect to the compensation of our senior personnel, including the NamedSenior Executive Officers.Management. The nature and scope of the services provided to the Compensation Committee by Compensia in 20152020 were as follows:
•assisted in refining our overall compensation strategy and design of the annual and long-term incentive compensation plans;
•evaluated the efficacy of our compensation policies and practices in supporting and reinforcing our long-term strategic goals;
•provided advice with respect to compensation best practices and market trends;
•evaluated our compensation peer group to be used in the development of competitive compensation levels and practices;
evaluated the competitiveness of our executive and director compensation programs;
provided •ad hoc advice and support throughout the year; and
assisted with the development of our executive compensation-related disclosure in consultation with our outside legal advisers.
As part of its engagement, Compensia also assisted the Compensation Committee with the evaluation of the compensation peer group, and using this compensation peer group provided competitive market data and analysis relating to the compensation of our senior personnel, including our NEOs;
•evaluated our severance and change in control arrangements;
•evaluated the Named Executive Officers.competitiveness of our executive and non-employee director compensation programs;
•provided ad hoc advice and support throughout the year; and
•assisted with the development of our executive compensation-related disclosure in consultation with our legal advisors.
The Compensation Committee may replace any of its compensation consultantadvisors or hire additional advisors at any time. Representatives of Compensia attend meetings of the Compensation Committee, as requested, and communicate with the Compensation Committee Chair and with management as circumstances warrant. All decisions regarding theSenior Executive Management compensation of our Named Executive Officers,decisions, however, are made by the Compensation Committee. For further discussion regarding the compensation consultant independence evaluation process, see the section titled "Information Regarding Committees of the Board of Directors-Compensation Committee Processes and Procedures" above.
Compensia reports directly to the Compensation Committee and does not provide any services directly to us or our management. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Compensia taking into account, among other things, the enhanced independence standards and factors set forth in Exchange Act Rule 10C and the applicable listing standards of The New York Stock Exchange, and concluded that that there are no conflicts of interest with respect to the work that Compensia performs for the Compensation Committee.
Use of Competitive CompensationMarket Data
TheTo aid in the evaluation of our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee, assisted by Compensia, has developed a compensation peer group based on an evaluationwhich is used to assess the competitive market for executive talent. In selecting our peer group, the Compensation Committee, with the input of its compensation consultant, Compensia, identified companies that it believed were comparable to us, taking into consideration the size of each company (based primarily on revenues and market capitalization) and the following additional factors:
•the comparability of the company’s business model;
•the company’s business services focus;
•the comparability of the company’s organizational complexities and growth attributes; and
•the comparability of the company’s operational performance.
In December 2014, Compensia, at the direction of theThe Compensation Committee evaluatedapproved the existingfollowing group of peer companies in May 2019 to aid in the evaluation of our 2020 Senior Executive Management compensation program. At the time the peer group and recommended towas approved, the Compensation Committee the following peer group to consist of 17 publicly-traded business services and related technology companies, which the Compensation Committee subsequently approved. The selected companies had revenues ranging from approximately $616$1.8 billion to approximately $4.7 billion and market capitalization ranging from approximately $505 million to approximately $2.6 billion, with a median of $1.8 billion, and market capitalizations ranging from approximately $769 million to approximately $16.5 billion, with a median $3.8$29.9 billion. The companies comprising this compensation peer group are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| American Equity Investment | | Genpact |
| Broadridge Financial Solutions | | Insperity | | Synopsys |
| Cadence Design Systems | | MAXIMUS | | Total System ServicesMaximus |
ConvergysCNO Financial Group | | Mentor Graphics | | VantivPrimerica |
Fair IsaacConduent | | PaychexSS&C Technologies |
| CoreLogic | | WorkdaySynopsys |
| FTI Consulting | | Teradata |
| Gartner | | PTC | | RCS Capital |
TIBCO | | | | |
This compensationAs part of the annual review of the peer group (with the exception of RCS Capital and TIBCO) was used bycompanies, the Compensation Committee in connection with its annual review of our executive compensation program in Februaryremoved Convergys from the prior year’s peer group, as they had been acquired, and March 2015 and March 2016.added Genpact to the peer group.
We do not believe that it is appropriate to make compensation decisions, whether regarding base salaries or annual or long-term incentive compensation, upon any type of benchmarking to a peer or other representative group of companies. Rather, theThe Compensation Committee believes that the evaluation of information regarding the compensation practices at other companies is useful as a reference point for its compensation decisions in two respects. First, the Compensation Committee recognizes that our compensation policies and practices must be competitive in the marketplace. Second, this information is useful in assessing the reasonableness and appropriateness of individual executive compensation elements and of our overall executive compensation packages. As noted in “Compensation-Setting Process – Roleunder the headings “Compensation Philosophy and Objectives” above, its review of Compensation Committee” on page 23 of this Proxy Statement. this informationcompetitive market data is only one of several factors that the Compensation Committee considers in making its decisions with respect to the compensation of our senior personnel, including our NamedSenior Executive Officers.Management. For instance, in addition to peer group data, the Compensation Committee also reviews compensation survey data for some of its executive positions.
Compensation Elements
Our executiveSenior Executive Management compensation program consists primarily of three elements: base salary, annual cash incentive compensation, and long-term equity incentive awards, as described in the following table:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Compensation Element | | | | |
Compensation
Element
| | What This Element Rewards | | Purpose and | | Key Features of Element |
| | |
Base salarySalary | | Individual performance, level of experience, expected future performance and contributions | | Provides a competitive level of fixed compensation determined bybased on the market value of the position, with actual base salaries establishedposition. Rewards experience and expected future contribution. | | Established based on competitive comparisons, level of responsibility and the facts and circumstances of each executive officer and each individual positionposition. |
| Annual Cash Incentives | | |
Annual cash
incentive
compensation
| | AchievementMotivates achievement of pre-established corporateshort-term Company and individual performance objectivesobjectives. | | Motivate executive officers to achieve (i) corporate financial performance objectives duringActual payment is at-risk and varies based on the year, (ii)achievement of pre-established, short-term Company and individual management objectives, and (iii) for some participants, departmental objectives tied to the department’s financial performance
Generally, performance levels are established to incentivize our executive officers to achieve or exceed performance objectives. For example, payouts for 2015 could range from 0% to 100% for achievement of all “target” objectives and 150% to 175% for achievement of all “maximum” objectives (with payouts scaled between all those levels)
|
|
| Long-term Time-based Equity Awards | | Attract and retain senior executives and align their interests with the long-term market value of our common stock. | | |
| | |
Long-term equity
incentiveGranted annually, these awards (mix of equity vehicles to be granted)
| | Creation of sustainable stock price appreciation over a multi-year period through successful execution of long-term financial and strategic objectives
Vesting requirements promote retention of executive officers
| | Grants of options to purchase shares of common stock that vest over four years, and provide an at-risk variable pay opportunity. Because the ultimate value of these equity awards is directly related to achieve our retention objectives. Actual payment varies based on the market price of our common stock,stock.
|
| Long-term Performance-based Equity Awards | | Motivates achievement of long-term, strategic Company performance objectives. | | Actual payment occurs over multiple years, is at-risk and the options may only be exercised over an extended period of time subject to vesting, they serve to focus managementvaries based on the creation and maintenanceachievement of long-term, stockholder value.
Grants of time based RSUs that vest over four years and provide an at-risk variable pay opportunity. Because the ultimate value of these equity awards is directly related to the market price of our common stock, and the RSUs may only vest over an extended period of time subject to vesting, they serve to focus management on the creation and maintenance of long-term stockholder value.
|
| | | | Grants of PSU awards, with the shares of our common stock subject to such awards to be earned over a three-yearstrategic Company performance period based on our actual results as measured against target levels for cumulative annual revenue growth. First, the multi-year performance period reinforces our compensation philosophy of paying for performance and setting performance objectives that encourage the successful execution of our long-term business strategy. In addition, the selected performance measure—cumulative annual revenue growth—we believe is an appropriate measure for our current stage of development as it represents a rigorous means of evaluating our performance over the next several years and assessing whether we have achieved our objective of creating long-term stockholder value.objectives. |
Our executive officers also participateIn addition to the compensation elements outlined above, our Senior Executive Management participates in several Company-wide employee benefit plans whichthat are generally consistent with the arrangements offeredor available to our other U.S. employees. Finally, our executive officersOur Senior Executive Management also are eligible for severance and double-trigger change in control severance payments and benefits, as described under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.
Compensation Mix
Our Senior Executive Management compensation program is designed to receivealign the interests of our Senior Executive Management with those of our stockholders. As a modest levelresult, a large percentage of perquisitesthe target total direct compensation of our executives is in the form of long-term equity awards and other personal benefitsannual cash incentive awards and, certain post-employment compensation arrangements.
Base Salary
thus, is variable and "at risk." These awards are tied to the achievement of Company-wide financial objectives and individual performance goals. We believe these performance goals and objectives correlate with long-term stockholder value creation. This allows us to incentivize and reward our Senior Executive Management for achieving and/or exceeding strategic Company goals and financial objectives, while ensuring that a competitivesignificant portion of compensation remains variable and “at risk” in the event that our strategic and financial goals are not achieved or as a result of our stock price performance. Further, we provide special non-recurring bonuses to recruit and retain certain members of our Senior Executive Management team: Ms. Tuminelli was provided a $1,000,000 signing bonus and a lump sum payment of $400,000 to assist with relocation expenses in 2020; Mr. Kohler was provided a $500,000 promotion-related bonus; and Mr. Murphy was provided retention bonuses in the amount of $374,000 in aggregate.
The following table shows the 2020 compensation mix for the target total direct compensation of our CEO and NEOs in 2020. For this purpose, the compensation mix at target includes (i) base salary for 2020; (ii) the bonuses described in the above paragraph; (iii) 2020 annual cash incentive at target; (iv) grant date value of RSU Awards granted in 2020; and (v) grant date value at target of performance-based restricted stock unit awards ("PSU Awards") granted in 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Base Salary ($)(1) | | Bonus | | Annual Cash Incentive Award @ Target ($) | | 2020 RSU Awards ($) | | 2020 PSU Awards @ Target ($) | | Total @ Target Compensation ($) |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 950,000 | | — | | 1,425,000 | | 3,250,044 | | 3,250,044 | | 8,875,088 |
Kelly Tuminelli(2) | | 625,000 | | 1,400,000 | | 196,496(2) | | 3,000,065 | | — | | 5,221,561 |
Olivier Kohler(3) | | 625,000 | | 500,000 | | 596,858 | | 2,500,040 | | 1,500,008 | | 5,721,906 |
| Samantha Wellington | | 500,000 | | — | | 350,000 | | 875,044 | | 875,044 | | 2,600,088 |
| Edward Griese | | 413,000 | | — | | 289,100 | | 425,047 | | 425,047 | | 1,552,194 |
| Richard Beckert | | 610,000 | | — | | 226,000(4) | | — | | — | | 836,000 |
| Michael P. Murphy | | 425,000 | | 374,000 | | 297,500 | | 500,003 | | 500,003 | | 2,096,506 |
| Barrett Boston | | 460,000 | | — | | 515,000 | | 550,008 | | 550,008 | | 2,075,016 |
(1)Base salaries were effective as of April 1, 2020, with the exception of Ms. Tuminelli who joined the Company on September 8, 2020, and Mr. Kohler who received a promotion-related base salary increase effective July 25, 2020.
(2)Ms. Tuminelli's annual cash incentive target is prorated based on her hire date. She received an equity grant in October 2020 solely in RSUs. The Compensation Committee determined it was appropriate not to grant her PSUs so late in the 2020 performance period.
(3)The figures in this table for Mr. Kohler reflect the following items he became entitled to in connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer: (i) an annual base salary increase from $575,000 to $625,000, (ii) a necessary element$500,000 promotion-related bonus, (iii) target variable compensation at 100% of his annual base salary including the promotion-related base salary increase in July 2020, and (iv) an award of service-vested RSU Awards with a grant date value of approximately $1,000,000.
(4)Mr. Beckert's annual cash incentive target is prorated based on his termination date on May 15, 2020.
The following charts show the 2020 compensation mix for our CEO and the average 2020 compensation mix for our other NEOs (excluding Ms. Tuminelli because she joined the Company in the third quarter of 2020 and excluding Messrs. Beckert, Murphy and Boston because they left their positions in 2020), in each case assuming target achievement under our annual cash incentive plan and including only the target grant date value of equity awards actually granted during 2020.
2020 Compensation Mix at Target
Pay for Performance in 2020
One of the key goals of our executive compensation program sois to tie executive compensation to overall Company performance and the achievement of strategic goals.
In 2020, in terms of operational achievements, we:
•continued to grow our revenues, although at a slower rate than we initially expected due to the impact from COVID-19 on both new sales and our clients;
•created our Recovery Credit program to assist our eligible clients, resulting in a reduction in revenue recognized;
•saw our worksite employees ("WSEs") increasing their participation, or enrollment, in our insurance offerings;
•experienced lower utilization of health services primarily in the second quarter, although utilization approached more typical levels through the second half of the year;
•completed the acquisition of Little Bird HR, Inc., expanding our footprint in our non-profit vertical;
•launched the extension of our People Matter branding campaign - Humanity Campaign; and
•delivered profitable growth as a result of revenue growth and lower insurance costs.
When designing the 2020 compensation program in late 2019 and early 2020, the Compensation Committee, with its compensation consultant, Compensia, reviewed the available information about COVID-19 and its potential impact on our business. On subsequent occasions during the year, the Compensation Committee revisited the 2020 compensation program to take into account evolving developments related to COVID-19. The Compensation Committee determined that adjustments to the compensation program were unnecessary based on the information available. The unfolding COVID-19 crisis, including its impact on the economy and our business, will be taken into account in determining compensation for our NEOs on a go-forward basis.
Performance Highlights
These operational achievements drove the financial performance improvements noted below in 2020 when compared to 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| $4.0B | | $368M | | $1.1B |
| Total revenues | | Operating income | | Net Service Revenue * |
| 5 | % | increase | | 37 | % | increase | | 14 | % | increase |
| | | | | | | | |
| $272M | | $3.99 | | $303M |
| Net income | | Diluted EPS | | Adjusted Net income * |
| 28 | % | increase | | 34 | % | increase | | 28 | % | increase |
| | | | | | | | |
* Non-GAAP measure; these measures are defined and reported under “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” pages 32 to 52 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. In addition, for the definition of Net Service Revenues, see the section titled "2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan Performance Objectives" below.
Our results for WSEs and payroll and payroll tax payments in 2020 when compared to the prior year were:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 323,672 | | 331,908 | | $44.9B |
| Average WSE | | Total WSE | | Payroll and payroll tax payments |
| — | % | no change | | (2) | % | reduction | | 8 | % | increase |
The compensation of our NEOs was aligned with this performance. Specifically, our:
•2020 annual cash incentive plan (the "2020 Executive Bonus Plan") payout to our CEO was 129% of target;
•2020 Executive Bonus Plan average payout to our other eligible NEOs was 122% of target excluding Messrs. Murphy and Boston because they left their positions in 2020 and therefore did not receive a 2020 annual cash incentive payment.
•Net Service Revenue annual growth rate (“Net Service Revenue Growth Rate”) of 14% was above target and the GAAP earnings per share annual growth rate (“GAAP EPS Growth Rate,” as defined in the section titled "Performance-Based Equity Incentive Awards" below) of 34% was above target for the 2020 performance period under our 2020 PSU Awards. Our 2020 PSU Awards had a single performance period from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, and, if earned, will vest 50% on December 31, 2021 and 50% on December 31, 2022, subject to continuous service through each date.
2020 Executive Bonus Plan Performance
Net Service Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures that we canuse to measure performance under the 2020 Executive Bonus Plan and exclude the direct impact of any mergers or acquisitions. For the definition of these measures, see the section titled "2020 Executive Compensation-2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan Performance Objectives" below. These measures are also defined and reported in "Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
The following graphs show our actual achievement against the performance targets under our 2020 Executive Bonus Plan.
2020 Executive Bonus Plan Performance
2020 Performance-based Restricted Stock Award Performance
The following graph shows our achievement against the target Net Service Revenue Growth Rate and GAAP EPS Growth Rate for the 2020 performance period under our 2020 PSU Awards. Net Service Revenue Growth Rate and GAAP EPS Growth Rate are non-GAAP financial measures that we used to measure performance for the 2020 PSU Awards and exclude the direct impact of any mergers or acquisitions.
2020 PSU Performance
2020 Performance-based Compensation Summary
Based on the 2020 results above, factoring in the level of achievement of our Company's corporate financial goals and certain individual goals for the cash incentive awards and 2020 PSU Awards, our NEOs earned the following amounts as a percentage of their 2020 targets under our performance-based compensation programs:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | 2020 Cash Incentive Award as % of Target(1) | | | Actual Shares Earned as % of 2020 PSU Awards Target(2) |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 129% | | | 184% |
| Kelly Tuminelli | | 129% | | | —% |
| Olivier Kohler | | 114% | | | 184% |
| Samantha Wellington | | 122% | | | 184% |
| Edward Griese | | 114% | | | 184% |
| Richard Beckert | | 129% | | | —% |
| Michael P. Murphy | | —% | | | —% |
| Barrett Boston | | —% | | | —% |
(1)Ms. Tuminelli's annual cash incentive target was prorated based on her hire date, and Mr. Kohler's annual cash incentive target reflects his promotion-related salary increase in July 2020.
(2)Our 2020 PSU Awards had a single performance period from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, and, if earned, will vest 50% on December 31, 2021 and 50% on December 31, 2022, subject to continuous service through each date.
2020 Total Direct Compensation Highlights
The following table shows the “total direct compensation” for our NEOs in 2020 and reflects the key compensation decisions made during 2020 or based on 2020 performance. For this purpose, "total direct compensation" includes (i) actual base salary earned for 2020; (ii) special non-recurring bonuses; (iii) annual cash incentive paid based on 2020 performance; (iv) the grant date value of time-based RSU Awards granted during 2020; and (v) shares earned by our NEOs based on the 2020 performance period pursuant to our 2020 PSU Awards:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Actual Base Salary ($) | | Bonus(1) | | Annual Cash Incentive Award ($) | | RSU Awards ($)(2) | | Shares Earned under 2020 PSU Awards ($)(3) | | 2020 Total Compensation ($) |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 937,500 | | — | | 1,840,000 | | 3,250,044 | | 5,976,332 | | 12,003,876 |
| Kelly Tuminelli | | 196,496 | | 1,400,000 | | 254,000 | | 3,000,065 | | — | | 4,850,561 |
| Olivier Kohler | | 590,451 | | 500,000 | | 683,000 | | 2,500,040 | | 2,758,307 | | 7,031,798 |
| Samantha Wellington | | 485,000 | | — | | 427,000 | | 875,044 | | 1,609,012 | | 3,396,056 |
| Edward Griese | | 411,000 | | — | | 331,000 | | 425,047 | | 781,520 | | 1,948,567 |
| Richard Beckert | | 228,750 | | — | | 291,000 | | — | | — | | 519,750 |
| Michael P. Murphy | | 418,073 | | 374,000 | | — | | 500,003 | | — | | 1,292,076 |
| Barrett Boston | | 430,480 | | — | | — | | 550,008 | | — | | 980,488 |
(1)Ms. Tuminelli was provided a $1,000,000 signing bonus and $400,000 to assist with relocation expenses in 2020, Mr. Kohler was provided a $500,000 promotion-related bonus, and Mr. Murphy was provided retention bonuses in the amount of $374,000 in aggregate.
(2)Represents the grant date value based on the closing price of TriNet's common stock on the date of grant, which accounts for the RSU Award portion of the Stock Award column of the “Summary Compensation Table” of this Proxy Statement.
(3)Represents the grant date value of shares earned under 2020 PSU Awards based on the closing price of TriNet's common stock on the date of grant. The amounts in this table differ from those that account for the 2020 PSU Award portion of the Stock Award column of the “Summary Compensation Table” of this Proxy Statement because that table discloses the grant date value of the PSU Awards based on target performance level rather than the value of the shares actually earned in the performance period.
For more information on the executive compensation for our NEOs in 2020, see “2020 Executive Compensation” below.
2020 Executive Compensation
Base Salary
Base salaries for our NEOs in 2020 and 2019 were:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | 2020 Base Salary ($)(1) | | 2019 Base Salary ($)(1) | | Percentage Increase (%) |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 950,000 | | 900,000 | | 6% |
| Kelly Tuminelli | | 625,000 | | — | | N/A |
| Olivier Kohler | | 625,000 | | 550,000 | | 14% |
| Samantha Wellington | | 500,000 | | 440,000 | | 14% |
| Edward Griese | | 413,000 | | 405,000 | | 2% |
| Richard Beckert | | 610,000 | | 610,000 | | —% |
| Michael P. Murphy | | 425,000 | | 415,000 | | 2% |
| Barrett Boston | | 460,000 | | 446,250 | | 3% |
(1)Amount reflects annualized base salary effective as of April 1, 2020, with the exception of Ms. Tuminelli who joined the Company on September 8, 2020,and Mr. Kohler who received a 9% base salary increase effective July 25, 2020 related to his promotion to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.
We seek to pay market-competitive base salaries to attract and retain a stable executive team.team and ensure that our executives receive a fixed base level of compensation. Base salaries for the Named Executive Officers are also intended to be competitive with those received by other individuals in similar positions at the companies with which we compete for talent, as well as equitable across the executive team.
Generally, we establish the initial base salaries of the Named Executive Officersinitially set through arm’s-length negotiation at the time we hire the individual,of hiring, taking into account such individual’s position,level of responsibility, qualifications, experience, prior salary level and competitive market information. Base salaries for our NEOs are then reviewed and adjusted annually by the base salariesCompensation Committee.
Special Non-Recurring Cash Bonuses
For Ms. Tuminelli and Messrs. Kohler and Murphy, we also provided one-time cash bonuses as an inducement to hire and for retention purposes, as applicable. For Ms. Tuminelli, we made a lump sum payment of a $1,000,000 signing bonus, which was paid on September 30, 2020, and a lump sum payment of $400,000 to assist with relocation expenses, which was paid on October 30, 2020. For Mr. Kohler, we made a lump sum payment of a $500,000 promotion-related cash bonus, which was paid on September 15, 2020.
Mr. Murphy was eligible for the following potential retention bonus payments in 2020 to help ensure a smooth transition within the Finance leadership of the other Named Executive Officers.
Thereafter,Company: (i) $187,000 in the Compensation Committee reviewsevent Mr. Murphy remained employed by TriNet through the base salariesdate that occurred 14 calendar days after the filing of TriNet’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal year 2020; (ii) $187,000 in the event Mr. Murphy remained employed by TriNet through the date that occurred 14 calendar days after the filing of TriNet’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of fiscal year 2020; and (iii) $375,000 in the event Mr. Murphy remained employed by TriNet through the date that occurred 14 calendar days after the filing of TriNet’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2020. Mr. Murphy separated from us on December 28, 2020 and, prior to such date, was paid an aggregate of $374,000 in retention bonuses due to his satisfaction of the Named Executive Officers annuallyfirst two retention bonus conditions described above, $187,000 of which was paid on each of August 14, 2020 and makes adjustments to base salaries as it determines to be necessary or appropriate.November 16, 2020.
In February and March 2015, the Compensation Committee reviewed the base salaries of the Named Executive Officers, taking into consideration a competitive market analysis performed by Compensia and the recommendations of our CEO (except with respect to his own compensation), as well as the other factors described above. The Compensation Committee believed that our 2014 salaries were low because as a private company, we had strived to preserve cash, meaning salaries were generally below median based on our compensation peer group in favor of a heavier emphasis on equity compensation. Following this review, the Compensation
Committee decided to adjust the base salaries of the Named Executive Officers to better reflect competitive market conditions, effective April 1, 2015, other than Mr. Hammond, whose base salary remained unchanged. The base salaries of the Named Executive Officers for 2014 and 2015 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | | 2015 Base Salary | | 2014 Base Salary |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | $ | 725,000 |
| | $ | 600,000 |
|
| William Porter | | $ | 410,000 |
| | $ | 350,000 |
|
| Brady Mickelsen | | $ | 375,000 |
| | $ | — |
|
| John Turner | | $ | 350,000 |
| | $ | 300,000 |
|
| Gregory L. Hammond | | $ | 310,000 |
| | $ | 310,000 |
|
The base salaries of the Named Executive Officers during 2015 are also set forth in the Summary Compensation Table below.
Annual Cash Incentive Compensation
The target and actual annual cash incentive payouts for our NEOs for 2020 under the 2020 Executive Bonus Plan were:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | 2020 Target Annual Cash Incentive Opportunity ($) | | 2020 Target Annual Cash Incentive Opportunity as % of Base Salary(1) | | 2020 Actual Annual Cash Incentive Award ($) | | 2020 Actual Annual Cash Incentive Award as a % of 2020 Target Opportunity |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 1,425,000 | | 150% | | 1,840,000 | | 129% |
| Kelly Tuminelli | | 196,496 | | 100% | | 254,000 | | 129% |
| Olivier Kohler | | 596,858 | | 100% | | 683,000 | | 114% |
| Samantha Wellington | | 350,000 | | 70% | | 427,000 | | 122% |
| Edward Griese | | 289,100 | | 70% | | 331,000 | | 114% |
| Richard Beckert | | 226,000 | | 100% | | 291,000 | | 129% |
| Michael P. Murphy | | 297,500 | | 70% | | — | | —% |
| Barrett Boston | | 515,000 | | 112% | | — | | —% |
(1)Amount reflects the percentage of the base salary levels in effect as of April 1, 2020, with the exception of Ms. Tuminelli who joined the Company on September 8, 2020,and Mr. Kohler who received a promotion-related base salary increase effective July 25, 2020.
We use annual cash bonuses paid under our Executive Bonus Planincentives to motivate the Named Executive Officersour executives to achieve our short-term financial and operational objectives and individual performance goals, while making progress towards our longer-term growth and otherstrategic goals. Consistent withThe amount of cash incentive awards our executive compensation philosophy,NEOs earn under our plan is "at-risk" and variable based on our achievement against these annual cash bonuses constitute a significant percentageobjectives.
2020 Annual Cash Incentive Plan Performance Objectives
During the first quarter of each year, the Compensation Committee selects the financial performance measures and sets the target total direct compensation opportunity oflevels for those measures and approves new individual and strategic performance goals to properly incentivize our Senior Executive Management, including our NEOs, to achieve key business objectives for the Named Executive Officers.
Underyear and create long-term value for the Company’s stockholders. In early 2020, the Compensation Committee established the financial performance objectives and management business objectives ("MBOs") for our NEOs under our 2020 Executive Bonus Plan, annualPlan. As described in more detail below, the actual cash bonuses are awardedincentive award payouts for 2020 were based on theour actual achievement of Company-wideagainst these financial objectives and departmental and individual management business objectives (“MBOs”) selected by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of each of the Named Executive Officers relative to such individual’s target annual cash bonus opportunity objectives at its regularly scheduled February meeting, which is typically its first meeting following the end of our fiscal year. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee determines and approves the annual cash bonuses for each of the Named Executive Officers.
Target Cash Bonus Opportunities
The target cash bonus opportunities for each of the Named Executive Officers under the Executive Bonus Plan for 2015 (the “2015 Executive Bonus Plan”), expressed as a fixed dollar amount, were as follows:
|
| | | |
| Named Executive Officer | Annualized Target Cash Bonus Opportunity(1) |
| Burton M. Goldfield | $ | 725,000 |
|
| William Porter | $ | 300,000 |
|
| Brady Mickelsen | $ | 230,000 |
|
| John Turner | $ | 350,000 |
|
| Gregory L. Hammond | $ | 160,000 |
|
| |
(1) | Mr. Mickelsen's actual target cash bonus opportunity for 2015 was prorated based on his start date in June 2015. |
Weighting of Cash Bonus Opportunities
The Compensation Committee considered Company-wide financial performance, as well as departmental and individual achievement, when determining annual cash bonuses under the 2015 Executive Bonus Plan. The weighting of the cash bonus opportunities between the Company-wide financial objectives and individual MBOs was as follows:
|
| | | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | | Weighting of Company-Wide Financial
Objectives | | Weighting of Individual
Management Business Objectives |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 75 | % | | 25 | % |
| William Porter | | 75 | % | | 25 | % |
| Brady Mickelsen | | 50 | % | | 50 | % |
| John Turner | | 50 | % | | 50 | % |
| Gregory L. Hammond | | 50 | % | | 50 | % |
These allocations were determined to be appropriate by the Compensation Committee (and, in the case of our CEO, by the independent members of our Board of Directors) due to the greater responsibility of our CEO and CFO for the overall direction and success of our business.
Corporate Financial ObjectivesMBOs.
The financial performance measures selected by the Compensation Committee for the 2015under our 2020 Executive Bonus Plan were Net Service Revenues and adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”). The Compensation Committee believed these two performance measures were appropriate for our business because they provided a balance between growing revenue and managing our expenses, which it believes best measures short-term performance.
For purposes of the 2015 Executive Bonus Plan, these financial measures were calculated after applying adjustments to the applicable GAAP financial measures as follows:
“Net Service Revenues” meant the sum of professional service revenues and Net Insurance Service Revenues (which was defined to mean insurance service revenues less insurance costs, which include the premiums we pay to insurance carriers for the health and workers compensation insurance coverage provided to our clients and worksite employees and the reimbursements we pay to the insurance carriers for claim payments within our insurance deductible layer).
“Adjusted EBITDA” meant net income (loss), excluding the effectsdirect impact of our income tax provision (benefit), interest expense, depreciation, amortization of intangible assetsany mergers and stock-based compensation expense.
Underacquisitions, and the 2015 Executive Bonus Plan, actual bonusestarget performance levels for these measures were determined by reference to a matrix to measure the effects of overachievement or underachievement of the two corporate financial measures, as follows:
For each 1.5% increase or decrease in actual Net Service Revenues against the target level established for this measure, there was to be a corresponding 10% increase or decrease in the amount of the cash bonus (or, in the case of Mr. Turner, 15%).
For each 0.8% increase or 1.0% decrease in actual Adjusted EBITDA against the target level established for this measure, there was to be a corresponding 10% increase or decrease in the amount of the cash bonus (or, in the case of Mr. Turner, 15%).
The Compensation Committee also established a target Adjusted EBITDA level as a percentage of our Net Service Revenues goal. For purposes of the 2015 Executive Bonus Plan, no bonus was payable if we achieved less than 92.5% of the target Adjusted EBITDA level as a percentage of Net Service Revenues. Further, no bonus was payable, even at higher performance levels, if performance was below target levels for both Adjusted EBITDA and Net Service Revenues. The maximum bonus payable to any executive officer based on company-wide financial objectives was 200% of such executive officer’s target cash bonus opportunity (235% in the case of Mr. Turner).
The Compensation Committee established the following target levels for each of the financial measures under the 2015 Executive Bonus Plan for the Named Executive Officers:
|
| | | | | | | |
Financial MeasureObjective | | 2015 Target Level |
| Net Service Revenues | | $600.11,024 million |
| Adjusted EBITDA | | $202.0412 million |
No bonus was payable to our executives under our 2020 Executive Bonus Plan if we achieved Adjusted EBITDA of less than $350.2 million.
Net Service Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measurements that are calculated by applying the following adjustments to our applicable GAAP financial measures:
| | | | | | | | |
| Financial Objective | | Definition |
| Net Service Revenues | | Sum of professional service revenues and Net Insurance Service Revenues, or total revenues less insurance costs excluding the direct impact of any mergers or acquisitions. |
Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage | | Net income, excluding the effects of: income tax provision, interest expense, depreciation, amortization of Net Service Revenues | | 33.67%intangible assets, and stock-based compensation expense excluding the direct impact of any mergers or acquisitions. |
Management Business Objectives
In addition to the corporateabove financial performance objectives, the annual cash bonuses payable to the NamedMBOs for each of our NEOs were established as part of our 2020 Executive Officers were also based on each such individual’s achievement against the management business objectives (“MBOs”) established for the year. TheBonus Plan. Our MBOs may be quantitative or qualitative goals, depending on the organizational priorities for a given year, and typically focus on key departmental or operational objectives or functions. Most of the MBOs are intended to provide a set of common objectives that facilitate collaborative management and engagement, although the Named Executive Officersour NEOs also may also be assigned individual goals. In all cases, the MBOsHowever, even if financial objectives or MBO objectives, or both, are intended to be challenging, but attainable, and designed to provide annual cash bonus awards that reflect meaningful performance.
In the case of his direct reports, their MBOs were determined by our CEO and then reviewed and approved bymet, the Compensation Committee. In the caseCommittee may determine to reduce or not pay cash incentive awards through its exercise of our CEO, his MBOs were determined by the independent members of our Board of Directors, basednegative discretion depending on recommendations made both by the CEO and the members of the Compensation Committee.overall Company performance or individual performance.
The Compensation Committee established a numberthe following common MBOs for our NEOs under our 2020 Plan:
•Achieve financial plan
•Deliver outstanding client experience
•Deliver industry leading platform and differentiated vertical products
•Achieve operational excellence and scale
•Deliver outstanding colleague experience
Weighting of MBOs and corresponding measurement metrics under the 20152020 Executive Bonus Plan Performance Objectives and Award Payout Range
The Compensation Committee considered Company-wide financial performance as well as departmental and individual achievement in assigning the weighting below to the target annual cash incentive award opportunities for our NEOs under our 2020 Executive Bonus Plan:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Financial Objectives | | Strategic Performance |
| Name | | Net Service Revenues | | Adjusted EBITDA | | MBOs |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 37.5% | | 37.5% | | 25% |
| Kelly Tuminelli | | 37.5% | | 37.5% | | 25% |
| Olivier Kohler | | 25% | | 25% | | 50% |
| Samantha Wellington | | 25% | | 25% | | 50% |
| Edward Griese | | 25% | | 25% | | 50% |
| Richard Beckert | | 37.5% | | 37.5% | | 25% |
| Michael P. Murphy | | 37.5% | | 37.5% | | 25% |
| Barrett Boston | | 25% | | 25% | | 50% |
Payouts under our 2020 Executive Bonus Plan could scale between 0% and 200% of an NEO's target cash incentive award opportunity as follows:
•Net Service Revenues - For every 1.0% below goal, bonus scales down 10% and for every 1.0% above goal, bonus scales up by 6.67%; and
•Adjusted EBITDA - For every 1.0% below goal, bonus scales down 6.67%, and for every 1.0% above goal, bonus scales up by 4.0%.
The following table shows the Namedthreshold, target and maximum performance levels (and the associated potential award) under our 2020 Executive Officers, including the following: improving the overall customer experience, strengthening the sales force, executing on our vertical product strategy, enhancing our platform for product deliveryBonus Plan:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | % of Net Service Revenue Target | | Award % | | % of Adjusted EBITDA Target | | Award % |
| Threshold | | 90% | | 0% | | 85% | | 0% |
| Target | | 100% | | 100% | | 100% | | 100% |
| Max | | 115% | | 200% | | 125% | | 200% |
Achievement and internal process improvement and pursuing potential acquisition opportunities that would help us grow or expand our product and service offerings.
2015 Performance Results andActual Awards under Our 2020 Executive Bonus DecisionsPlan
In March 2016,2021, the Compensation Committee determined that our actual achievement with respect to the corporate financial objectives under the 2015our 2020 Executive Bonus Plan (described above) was as follows:
|
| | | | |
| Performance Measure | | 2015 Target Level | | 2015 Actual Result |
| Net Service Revenues | | $600.1 million | | $546.9 million |
| Adjusted EBITDA | | $202.0 million | | $151.3 million |
| Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Net Service Revenues | | 33.67% | | 27.67% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Financial Objective | | 2020 Target | | 2020 Actual | | Achievement % |
| Net Service Revenues | | $1,024 million | | $1,054 million | | 119% |
| Adjusted EBITDA | | $412 million | | $472 million | | 158% |
Based on these results and after evaluation and review of our NEOs' respective performance against their individual MBOs, the Compensation Committee determined that each Company-wide financial objective for 2015 had been achieved at a level that resulted in no payout under the 2015 Executive Bonus Plan with respect to the financial objectives.
The Compensation Committee also reviewed the MBOs of each Named Executive Officer and determined that the MBOs2020 goals had been attained at the following percentage levels based on an average percentagefor each of achievement and weight of each MBO:
|
| | | |
| | |
Named Executive Officer | | Management Business Objectives
Attainment Level |
Burton M. Goldfield | | 20 | % |
William Porter | | 20 | % |
Brady Mickelsen | | 20 | % |
John Turner | | 20 | % |
Gregory L. Hammond(1)
| | N/A |
|
| |
(1) | Mr. Hammond retired from his position as Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, effective June 21, 2015. |
Although theour NEOs. The Compensation Committee determined that each ofapproved the Named Executive Officers had achieved 20% of his MBOs, based on the Compensation Committee's review of our overall performance, the performance of our various business units, and the individual performance of each Named Executive Officer for 2015 against the corporate financial objectives and the departmental and individual MBOs described above, and in accordance with its belief that there should be a strong relationship between pay and corporate performance, the Compensation Committee determined, in its discretion, to not award anyfollowing annual cash bonuses for the Named Executive Officers, as reflected in the table below:incentive payouts:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Net Service Revenue Target Weight | | Net Service Revenue Achievement as % of Target | | Adjusted EBITDA Target Weight | | Adjusted EBITDA Achievement as % of Target | | MBO Target Weight | | MBO Achievement as % of Target | | Total 2020 Actual Cash Incentive Award | | % of Prorated 2020 Target Incentive |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 37.5% | | 119% | | 37.5% | | 158% | | 25% | | 100% | | 1,840,000 | | 129% |
| Kelly Tuminelli | | 37.5% | | 119% | | 37.5% | | 158% | | 25% | | 100% | | 254,000 | | 129% |
| Olivier Kohler | | 25% | | 119% | | 25% | | 158% | | 50% | | 90% | | 683,000 | | 114% |
| Samantha Wellington | | 25% | | 119% | | 25% | | 158% | | 50% | | 105% | | 427,000 | | 122% |
| Edward Griese | | 25% | | 119% | | 25% | | 158% | | 50% | | 90% | | 331,000 | | 114% |
| Richard Beckert | | 37.5% | | 119% | | 37.5% | | 158% | | 25% | | 100% | | 291,000 | | 129% |
| Michael P. Murphy | | 37.5% | | 119% | | 37.5% | | 158% | | 25% | | 100% | | — | | —% |
| Barrett Boston | | 25% | | 119% | | 25% | | 158% | | 50% | | 100% | | — | | —% |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | | Annualized Target Cash Bonus
Opportunity(1) | | Amount
Related to
Company-wide
Financial
Objectives | | Amount
Related
to MBOs | | Actual Cash
Bonus | | Percentage of
Target Cash Bonus
Opportunity |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | $ | 725,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — | % |
| William Porter | | $ | 300,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — | % |
| Brady Mickelsen | | $ | 230,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — | % |
| John Turner | | $ | 350,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — | % |
Gregory L. Hammond(2) | | $ | 160,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — | % |
| |
(1) | While the information in this column is annualized, Mr. Mickelsen's actual target cash bonus opportunity for 2015 was prorated based on his start date in June 2015. |
| |
(2) | Mr. Hammond retired from his position as Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer effective June 21, 2015. |
As a result, no annual cash bonuses for the Named Executive Officers for 2015 are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table below.
2020 Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards
We believeThe Compensation Committee believes that ifequity compensation is integral to aligning the Namedlong-term interests of our Senior Executive Officers ownManagement with those of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee believes that by owning shares of our common stock, in amounts that are significant to them, they willour Senior Executive Management have an incentive to act to maximize long-term stockholder value. We also believe thatThis incentive to maximize long-term stockholder value is advanced further through our stock ownership guidelines. The Compensation Committee seeks to provide our Senior Executive Management with a blend of time-based and performance-based equity compensation is an integral componentawards. Our time-based equity awards are important for attracting and retaining executive officers. Because our time-based equity awards generally vest over four years and vary in value based on the market value of our efforts to attract and retain exceptional senior personnel.
For 2015,common stock, they also align the interests of our Senior Executive Management with the long-term market value of our common stock. Our performance-based equity awards reward our Senior Executive Management for achieving specific pre-established strategic business objectives, which the Compensation Committee added PSU awards and RSU awards tobelieves also will enhance the mixlong-term value of equity vehicles to be granted to certainour common stock.
During the first quarter of the Named Executive Officers. Whileeach year, the Compensation Committee had historically used stock options asevaluates, and may consider adjusting, the primary vehicletype and design of the equity awards, including establishing new financial performance criteria for providing long-term incentive compensation opportunitiesthe performance-based equity awards, to the Namedproperly incentivize our Senior Executive Officers, it determined that, as a publicly-traded company, the introduction of PSU awardsManagement, including our NEOs, to achieve key business objectives and RSU awards into our mix of long-term equity incentives was consistent with our objectives of retaining key talent in our industry and motivating the Named Executive Officers to focus their efforts on the creation of sustainablecreate long-term value for our stockholders.
In March 2015, For purposes of the 2020 equity award program, the Compensation Committee approved annual long-term incentive compensation awardsdetermined to grant a blend of 50% RSUs and 50% PSUs, based on their grant date value (assuming, with respect to the Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Hammond) comprised of one-third PSUs, one-third RSUs and one-third stock options. achievement at the target performance level).
In determining the total value amount of each Named Executive Officer’s annual long-term incentive compensation award,2020, the Compensation Committee took into considerationgranted the anticipated future growthfollowing equity awards to our NEOs:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Number of RSUs Granted (#) | Grant Date Value ($)(1) | Number of PSUs Granted @ Target (#) | Grant Date Value @ Target ($)(1) |
| Burton M. Goldfield | 61,484 | 3,250,044 | 61,484 | 3,250,044 |
Kelly Tuminelli(2) | 43,092 | 3,000,065 | — | — |
| Olivier Kohler | 44,248 | 2,500,040(3) | 28,377 | 1,500,008 |
| Samantha Wellington | 16,554 | 875,044 | 16,554 | 875,044 |
| Edward Griese | 8,041 | 425,047 | 8,041 | 425,047 |
| Richard Beckert | — | — | — | — |
| Michael P. Murphy | 9,459 | 500,003 | 9,459 | 500,003 |
| Barrett Boston | 10,405 | 550,008 | 10,405 | 550,008 |
(1)Calculated based on the closing price of TriNet's common stock on the date of grant, which are the same amounts disclosed in the “Summary Compensation Table” of this Proxy Statement.
(2)Ms. Tuminelli commenced her employment with the Company in September 2020, and as such, the Compensation Committee granted Ms. Tuminelli's equity award in October 2020.
(3)Includes a one-time award of RSUs with a grant date value of approximately $1,000,000 that were granted to Mr. Kohler in July 2020 in connection with his promotion.
The vesting schedule for our 2020 RSU Awards is as follows: 1/16th of the Company and each executive officer’s potential contributionstotal shares vest quarterly, subject to the successful executionNEO’s continued service with the Company.
2020 Performance-Based Equity Incentive Awards
The Compensation Committee selected two equally weighted performance measures for our 2020 PSU Awards: our Net Service Revenue Growth Rate and our GAAP EPS Growth Rate. We defined our "Net Service Revenue Growth Rate" as the annual growth rate in the Company's Net Service Revenues, as reported in the Company's audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, excluding direct impact of any mergers or acquisitions. We defined our "GAAP EPS Growth Rate" as annual growth rate in the Company's GAAP EPS, as reported in the Company's audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, excluding the direct impact of any mergers or acquisitions. The Compensation Committee believes these performance measures are an appropriate means to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies over time and our annual profitability, both of which measures are important to our objective of creating long-term business objectives,stockholder value.
The actual award was based on the Company's results based on the following annual growth rate percentages as wellshown in the table below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Threshold | | Target | | Maximum |
| Net Service Revenue Growth Rate | | 6% | | 10% | | 15% |
| GAAP EPS Growth Rate | | 4% | | 12% | | 20% |
Our 2020 PSU Awards were designed with a single-year performance measurement period subject to subsequent multi-year vesting requirements. 50% of the shares earned (if any) during the performance period (January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020) will vest under the award at the end of the second year (December 31, 2021) and the remaining 50% of shares earned (if any) will vest under the award at the end of the third year (December 31, 2022). The number of shares of our common stock that may be earned pursuant to our 2020 PSU Awards scale from 0% to 200% of the target award, as described in the factors described above.following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Below Threshold | | At Threshold | | Target | | Maximum |
| Performance Multiplier | | 0% | | 50% | | 100% | | 200% |
In designing our 2020 PSU Awards, the Compensation Committee considered a competitive market analysis prepared by Compensia, reviewed various design alternatives, and held discussions with Compensia and our CEO (except with respect to his own equity awards). The Compensation Committee also considered the existing equity holdings of each Named Executive Officer,of our NEOs, including the current economic value of their unvested and unearned equity awards, the mix of time-based and performance-based equity, the ability of these unvestedexisting equity holdings to satisfy our retention objectives. Further, the Compensation Committee took into consideration the recommendations of our CEO (except with respect to his own equity award). The Compensation Committee also considered the dilutive effect of our long-term equity incentive award practices, and the overall impact that theseof our mix of executive equity awards, as well as awards to other employees, will have on stockholder value.executive incentives and the market value of our common stock.
Shares Earned under our 2020 PSU Awards
The 2015 PSU awards were designed to reflectfollowing table shows our achievement against the following features:
Performance Period – measurement of performance takes place at the end of one, two and three year periods
Performance Measure – performance targets were based on cumulative annualtarget Annual Net Service Revenue growth (“CAGR”)
Growth Rate and Annual GAAP EPS Growth Rate for the 2020 performance period under our 2020 PSU Awards. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Required Growth Rate Percentage for Maximum Payout | | Actual 2020 Growth Rate | | Actual 2020 Performance Multiplier Achievement |
| Net Service Revenue Growth Rate | | 15% | | 13.4% | | 168% |
| GAAP EPS Growth Rate | | 20% | | 32.6% | | 200% |
Performance Range and Payout – the minimum, target and maximum payouts under the PSU awards are described inBased on such achievement, the following table:
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | Minimum | | Target | | Maximum |
Performance as a percentage of plan | | 12% revenue growth
CAGR
| | 15% revenue growth
CAGR
| | 20% revenue growth
CAGR
|
Payout as a percentage of plan | | 0%(1) of target award
shares
| | 100%(1) of target award
shares
| | 200%(1) of
target award shares
|
| |
(1) | 200% maximum potential earned amount tied to full three-year performance period; interim amounts that can be earned are capped at 150%. Payouts above and belowtable sets forth the target level are to be scaled on a linear basis. Shares earned above target level with respect to first and second years of performance period to be subject to vesting for remainder of performance period. |
The Compensation Committee believes that the design of the 2015 PSU awards is consistent with our compensation objectives for a number of reasons. First, the multi-year performance period reinforces our compensation philosophy of paying for performance and setting performance objectives that encourage the successful execution of our long-term business strategy. In addition, the Compensation Committee determined that the CAGR performance measure is an appropriate performance measure as it represents a means of evaluating our performance over multiple years and assessing whether we have achieved our objective of creating long-term stockholder value.
In March 2016, the Compensation Committee determined the actual number of shares earned under the 2015 PSU Awards by the CEO and certain eligible Named Executive Officers during the first measurement period of January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. The Compensation Committee determined the 2015 CAGR during the first measurement period was 8%, which was below the threshold performance goal of 12%. Therefore, none of the eligible Named Executive Officers were credited with any shares in connection with the first measurement period under the 2015 PSU awards. Under the terms of the 2015 PSU awards, the opportunity remained available for eligible Named Executive Officers to earn shares under the second and third measurement periods based on revenue growth during those periods, in each case subject to the maximum potential earned amount.
The Compensation Committee also granted stock options to all Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Hammond) in 2015. Because options to purchase shares of our common stock, must have an exercise price that is at least equaland value as of December 31, 2020, earned by our eligible NEOs under our 2020 PSU Awards, subject to the fair markettime-based vesting condition for the awards.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Grant Date | | Performance Period | Vesting Period after Performance Period(1) | | Target Shares (#) | | Shares Earned (#) | | Shares Earned as a % of Target | | Value of Shares Earned ($)(2) |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 2020 | | 1 year | 2 years | | 61,484 | | 113,061 | | 184% | | 5,976,332 |
Kelly Tuminelli(3) | | — | | — | — | | — | | — | | —% | | — |
| Olivier Kohler | | 2020 | | 1 year | 2 years | | 28,377 | | 52,182 | | 184% | | 2,758,307 |
| Samantha Wellington | | 2020 | | 1 year | 2 years | | 16,554 | | 30,441 | | 184% | | 1,609,012 |
| Edward Griese | | 2020 | | 1 year | 2 years | | 8,041 | | 14,786 | | 184% | | 781,520 |
Richard Beckert(3) | | — | | — | — | | — | | — | | —% | | — |
Michael P. Murphy(4) | | 2020 | | 1 year | 2 years | | 9,459 | | — | | —% | | — |
Barrett Boston(4) | | 2020 | | 1 year | 2 years | | 10,405 | | — | | —% | | — |
(1)Our 2020 PSU Awards had a single performance period from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, and, to the extent earned, will vest 50% on December 31, 2021 and 50% on December 31, 2022, subject to continuous service through each date.
(2)Represents the grant date value of ourshares earned under 2020 PSU Awards based on the closing price of TriNet's common stock on the date of grant. The amounts in this column differ from those that account for the 2020 PSU Award portion of the Stock Award column of the “Summary Compensation Table” of this Proxy Statement because that table discloses the grant date value of PSU Awards based on performance target level rather than the Named Executive Officers realize value fromof PSUs actually earned in the performance period.
(3)Ms. Tuminelli and Mr. Beckert did not receive 2020 PSU Awards.
(4)Messrs. Murphy and Boston forfeited their long-term equity incentive awards only if2020 PSU Awards prior to December 31, 2020.
In March 2021, the fair market valueCompensation Committee approved the actual number of shares of our common stock increases over time. The Compensation Committee approved the option grantsearned under our 2020 PSU Awards by our NEOs for the Named Executive Officers set forth in the table below, which vest over four years and expire 10 years after the date of grant if the recipient remains employed by the Company, which serves as an effective retention tool in addition to motivating executives to work toward corporate objectives that provide a meaningful return to our stockholders.2020 measurement period.
The Compensation Committee also granted RSUs to all Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Hammond) in 2015. The Compensation Committee determined that RSUs offer a predictable nature of value delivery to our Named Executive Officers and promote further alignment of the interests of our executive officers with the long-term interests of our stockholders. RSUs provide an important tool for us to retain our Named Executive Officers since the value of the awards is delivered over a four year period, subject to continued service with us. The Compensation Committee approved the RSU grants to the Named Executive Officers in 2015 as set forth in the table below, each of which vests 1/16 of the total shares quarterly (except for Mr. Mickelsen's grant which vest 25% after one year from grant date and 1/16 of the total shares vest quarterly thereafter), subject to the Named Executive Officer’s continued service with us. Our Compensation Committee chose this vesting schedule specifically to further our retention objectives. We believe that, at this stage of our growth, service-vested RSUs align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with the long-term interests of our stockholders, and provides incentives to our Named Executive Officers to continue to build and grow the company.
The equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officers in 2015 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Named Executive Officers | Number of Shares of Stock Options Granted | | Number of Shares of Restricted Stock Units Granted | | Number of Shares of Performance Stock Units Granted(1) |
| Burton M. Goldfield | 86,078 |
| | 34,816 |
| | 34,816 |
|
| William Porter | 27,053 |
| | 10,943 |
| | 10,943 |
|
Brady Mickelsen(2) | 30,000 |
| | 80,000 |
| | — |
|
| John Turner | 24,594 |
| | 9,948 |
| | 9,948 |
|
Gregory L. Hammond(3) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| |
(1) | PSUs granted at the target award level. |
| |
(2) | Mr. Mickelsen joined us in June 2015. His equity awards in 2015 were new hire grants primarily determined in amounts and forms typical for new hires and designed to encourage him to join us from his previous position. Mr. Mickelsen was not granted PSU awards. |
| |
(3) | Mr. Hammond retired as Chief Legal Officer of the Company, effective June 21, 2015. |
The equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officers for 2015 are also set forth in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grant of Plan-Based Awards table below.
Employee Benefit Plans
We have established a tax-qualified retirement plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) for all our U.S. employees, including the Namedour Senior Executive Officers,Management, who satisfy certain eligibility requirements, including requirements relating to age and length of service. Currently, we match the contribution made toUnder the plan, by our employees, including the Named Executive Officers,all participants receive a fully-vested matching contribution equal to 100% of their elective contributions up to $3,500 (effective for 2015) annually to each employee, which is fully vested.4% of their eligible compensation as defined by the plan and the Internal Revenue Code. We intend for thethis plan to qualify under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code so that contributions by employees to the plan, and income earned on plan contributions, are not taxable to employees until withdrawn from the plan.
In addition, we provide other benefits to the Namedour Senior Executive OfficersManagement on the same general basis as all of our full-time employees. These benefits include health, dental and vision benefits, health and dependent care flexible spending accounts, short-term and long-term disability insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, and basic life insurance coverage. We also provide vacation and other paid holidays to all employees, including the Named Executive Officers. We do not currently offer our employees a non-qualified deferred compensation plan or pension plan.
We design our employee benefits programs to be affordable and competitive in relation to the market, as well as compliant with applicable laws and practices. We adjust our employee benefits programs as needed based upon regular monitoring of applicable laws and practices, the competitive market and our employees’ needs.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
The Named Executive Officers are each eligible to seek reimbursement of up to $15,000 of life insurance premiums annually for supplemental life insurance coverage. We also reimburse the Named Executive Officers for financial planning and income tax services, up to a maximum of $10,000 per year. Periodically, when the Namedour Senior Executive OfficersManagement attend acertain Company-related function,functions, their spouses arespouse or partner may also be invited, in which case we may incur incremental travel and other event-related expenses for thosesuch spouses or partners, the cost of which is taxable to the NamedNEO and may be covered by the Company. The Company also may cover any additional tax gross-up payments associated with the taxable compensation. These travel-related expenses and tax gross-up payments are available to all colleagues attending the Company-related functions for which the benefits are available to the Senior Executive Officer.Management. Amounts paid in connection with, or reimbursed as a result of, these arrangements are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table below.
The Compensation Committee believes that these limited perquisites and other personal benefits serve a business purpose as they are important for attracting and retaining key talent, as well as fostering teamwork and cohesion among the Senior Executive Management.
2021 Executive Compensation
2021 Equity Awards
In March 2021, the Compensation Committee determined that our equity grant program would continue to be composed of a blend of 50% time-based equity awards and 50% performance-based equity awards in 2021, such awards calculated by grant datevalue. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Compensation Committee determined that Ms. Tuminelli's 2021 equity awards be comprised entirely of performance-based equity due to the grant of a time-based equity award with a grant date value of approximately $3,000,000 upon becoming our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in October 2020.
In March 2021, the Equity Award Committee of the Compensation Committee granted RSU Awards and PSU Awards to the Company’s NEOs listed below under the Company’s 2019 Equity Incentive Plan:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Maximum number of shares retained upon vesting of the RSUs | | Target number of shares retained upon vesting of the PSUs |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 35,851 | | 35,851 |
| Kelly Tuminelli | | — | | 14,938 |
| Olivier Kohler | | 16,432 | | 16,432 |
| Samantha Wellington | | 7,469 | | 7,469 |
| Edward Griese | | 3,586 | | 3,586 |
The RSU Awards are subject to the following vesting schedule: 1/16th of the total shares subject to the RSU Award (rounded down to the nearest whole share, except for the last vesting installment which will be rounded up or down, as necessary, to account for any prior fractional shares) shall vest on the 15th day of the second month of each calendar quarter following the RSU Award grant date, in each case provided that each recipient of an RSU Award is an Employee or Consultant (each as defined in our 2019 Equity Incentive Plan) of the Company on such vesting date.
The 2021 PSU Awards are earned based on the extent to which the Company meets or exceeds certain percentages of the following performance measures:
| | |
| Professional Service Revenue Growth Rate |
| GAAP Earnings Per Share |
These performance measures were modified from 2020 to 2021. Specifically, Professional Service Revenue Growth Rate replaces Net Service Revenue Growth Rate, and GAAP Earnings Per Share replaces EPS Growth Rate, in each case to more closely align with the Company's stated financial model and growth strategy. The measures exclude mergers and acquisitions and senior note issuance.
The 2021 PSU Awards are designed with a single-year performance period subject to subsequent multi-year vesting requirements. 50% of the shares earned, if any, during the performance period (January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021) will vest under the award at the end of the second year (December 31, 2022) and the remaining 50% of shares earned, if any, will vest under the award at the end of the third year (December 31, 2023).
The number of shares that may be earned pursuant to our 2021 PSU Awards scale from 0% to 200% of the target award, as set out in the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Below Threshold | | At Threshold | | Target | | Maximum |
| Performance Multiplier | | 0% | | 50% | | 100% | | 200% |
The performance multiplier for any achievement level which falls between any of the amounts set forth in the table above shall be determined by linear interpolation. Nothing greater than the Maximum Award can be earned under the Award.
In designing our 2021 equity awards, the Compensation Committee considered a competitive market analysis prepared by Compensia, reviewed various design alternatives, and held discussions with Compensia and our CEO (except with respect to his own equity awards). The Compensation Committee also considered the existing equity holdings of each of our NEOs, including the current economic value of their unvested and unearned equity awards, the mix of time-based and performance-based equity, and the ability of existing equity holdings to satisfy our retention objectives. The Compensation Committee also considered the dilutive effect of our long-term equity incentive award practices, and the overall impact of our mix of executive team.equity awards, as well as awards to other employees, on executive incentives and the market value of our common stock.
Weighting of 2021 Executive Bonus Plan Performance Objectives and Award Scale
In March 2021, the Compensation Committee approved the Company’s 2021 annual cash incentive plan (the "2021 Executive Bonus Plan"). Under the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan, the annual variable cash compensation is awarded based on company-wide financial goals for Professional Service Revenue (changed from Net Service Revenue in 2020 to align with the Company's stated financial model and growth strategy) and Adjusted EBITDA, excluding the direct impact of any mergers or acquisitions and senior note issuances. The variable cash compensation is also based on MBOs.
The Compensation Committee considered Company-wide financial performance, excluding direct impact of any mergers or acquisitions, as well as departmental and individual achievement, in assigning the weighting below to the target annual cash incentive award opportunities for our NEOs under our 2021 Executive Bonus Plan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Financial Objectives | | Strategic Performance |
| Name | | Professional Service Revenue | | Adjusted EBITDA | | MBOs |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 37.5% | | 37.5% | | 25% |
| Kelly Tuminelli | | 37.5% | | 37.5% | | 25% |
| Olivier Kohler | | 25% | | 25% | | 50% |
| Samantha Wellington | | 25% | | 25% | | 50% |
| Edward Griese | | 25% | | 25% | | 50% |
Payouts under our 2021 Executive Bonus Plan could scale between 0% and 200% of an NEO's target cash incentive award opportunity as follows:
•Professional Service Revenue - For every 1.0% below or above the target performance level, payouts scale up or down, respectively, by 10%; and
•Adjusted EBITDA - For every 1.0% below the target performance level, payouts scale down by 6.67%, and for every 1.0% above the target performance level, payouts scale up by 4.0%;
The following table shows the threshold, target and maximum performance levels (and the associated potential award) under our 2021 Executive Bonus Plan:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | % of Professional Service Revenue Target | | Award % | | % of Adjusted EBITDA | | Award % |
| Threshold | | 90% | | 0% | | 85% | | 0% |
| Target | | 100% | | 100% | | 100% | | 100% |
| Max | | 110% | | 200% | | 125% | | 200% |
Employment Agreements
We have entered intoexecuted written employment agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers.our NEOs. We believe that these employment agreements were necessary to induce these individuals to forego other employment opportunities or leave their current employer for the uncertainty of a demanding position in a new and unfamiliar organization.
In filling these executive positions, our Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee, as applicable, was aware that it would be necessary to recruit candidates with the requisite experience and skills to manage a growing business in a dynamic and ever-changing industry. Accordingly, it recognized that it would need to develop competitive compensation packages to attract qualified candidates in a highly-competitive labor market. At the same time, our Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee, as applicable, was sensitive to the need to integrate new executive officers into the executive compensation structure that it was seeking to develop, balancing both competitive and internal equity considerations.
Each of these employment agreements provides for “at will” employment and sets forth the initial compensation arrangements for the Named Executive Officer,NEO, including an initial base salary, an annual cash incentive compensation opportunity, and a recommendation for an initial equity award.
For a summary of the material terms and conditions of the employment agreement with each of our NEOs, see the Named Executive Officers, see “ – Employmentsection titled “Employment Arrangements” below.
Post-Employment CompensationSeverance/Change in Control Benefits
The employment agreements that we have entered into with each of the current Named Executive Officers generally provide for payments and benefits in the event of a qualifying termination of employment, in the form of lump sum cash payments calculated based on the individual’s base salary, payment or reimbursement of continued health insurance premiums and life or disability insurance premiums for a specified period, and partial accelerated vesting of outstanding and unvested equity awards. For purposes of these provisions, a qualifying “termination of employment” includes a termination of employment without cause or a resignation for good reason, and in each case requires that the Named Executive Officer execute a release of claims in favorEach of our Company. Mr. Goldfieldcurrent executive officers are entitled to certain severance and Mr. Porter are also eligible to receive payment of their target variable compensation at specified levels upon a qualifying termination of employment.
In the case of a termination of employment following a change in control of our Company, the Named Executive Officers are also eligiblebenefits pursuant to receive, in addition to the foregoing payments and benefits, full acceleration of vesting of outstanding and unvested equity awards.
We provide these arrangements to encourage the Named Executive Officers to work attheir employment agreements or under a dynamic and rapidly growing business where their long-term compensation largely depends on future stock price appreciation. Specifically, the arrangements are intended to mitigate a potential disincentive for the Named Executive Officers when they are evaluating a potential acquisition of our Company, particularly when the services of the executive officers may not be required by the acquiring entity. In such a situation, we believe that these arrangements are necessary to encourage retention of the Named Executive Officers through the conclusion of the transaction, and to ensure a smooth management transition. The Compensation Committee believes that, based on their experience, these payments and benefits are comparable to the payments and benefits provided to similarly-situated executive officers at other newly-public companies.
company severance benefit plan.For a summary of the material terms and conditions of the post-employment compensation arrangements with each ofseverance and change in control benefits our NEOs receive, see the Named Executive Officers, see “ – Potentialsection titled “Potential Payments uponUpon Termination or Change in Control” below.
For a description of the severance payments and benefits received by each of Messrs. Beckert, Murphy and Boston in connection with the terminations of their employment, see sections titled "Employment Arrangements" and "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control" below.
Other Compensation Policies
Stock Ownership Policy
We encourageIn 2017, to further align the Named Executive Officers to hold aninterests of our executives and the members of our Board with those of our stockholders, our Board adopted equity interest in our Company, but we currently do not have equity security ownership guidelines for certain executive officers and members of our Board. These guidelines, as amended, require our CEO and our other officers subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act to accumulate aggregate equity holdings equal to 500% and 300%, respectively, of their annual base salaries. Our non-employee directors are required to accumulate aggregate equity holdings equal to 500% of their annual cash retainer for regular service to the Board. Our executive officers and the members of our Board must satisfy these guidelines within the later of December 31, 2021, or requirements forwithin five years of the Named Executive Officers.date on which they become subject to these guidelines. As of December 31, 2020, each of our directors and required officers have met or are projected to meet their respective stock ownership requirement before their respective required time frames. Ms. Tuminelli, Dr. Kosecoff, Mr. Guertin and Ms. Contreras-Sweet are subject to the stock ownership policy beginning in 2020, and Mr. Clark beginning in 2021. Ms. Tuminelli became an executive officer of the Company on October 26, 2020, and has until December 31, 2025 to satisfy these guidelines. Dr. Kosecoff and Mr. Guertin joined our Board on January 15, 2020, and have until December 31, 2025 to satisfy these guidelines. Ms. Contreras-Sweet joined our Board on November 19, 2020, and has until December 31, 2025 to satisfy these guidelines, and Mr. Clark joined our Board on March 16, 2021, and has until December 31, 2026 to satisfy these guidelines. Shares owned directly may be counted toward compliance with these guidelines, while vested or unvested unexercised options, unvested RSUs and PSUs, and unvested restricted stock (both time-based and performance-based) are not counted toward meeting the ownership guidelines.
Compensation Recovery Policy
AsIn 2017, our Board adopted and subsequently amended as of 2020 a newly-public company, we have not adopted a formal compensation recovery, (“clawback”) policy. Underor “clawback” policy, under which we may generally seek reimbursement of cash compensation payments made to our NEOs and other current and former officers subject to Section 30416 of the Sarbanes-OxleyExchange Act of 2002, as applicablethat were based on achieving objective Company financial performance, if the covered executive engaged in fraud or intentional or unlawful misconduct that caused or otherwise materially contributed to all public companies, we operate under the requirementsa required restatement of that provision, under which our Board of Directors may seek reimbursement from our CEO and CFO if, as a result of their misconduct, we restate our financial results, dueand if a lower cash payment would have been made to our material noncompliance with anythe covered executive based upon those restated financial reporting requirements under the federal securities laws.results.
In addition, we willSuch policy shall be updated to comply with the requirements of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street ReformAct upon the Securities and Consumer Protection Act and will adopt a compensation recovery policy onceExchange Commission adoption of final regulations on the subject have been adopted.to implement this provision.
Equity Grant Policy
We generally follow
Generally, our Compensation Committee follows a regular pattern of granting annual or periodic “refresh” equity awards althoughto our executive officers and certain other employees. This process is overseen by our Compensation Committee and the timing, size and distribution of suchequity awards may change from timeyear to time. Weyear although they are typically awarded during the first quarter of the year.
As discussed above under the section "Information Regarding Committees of the Board of Directors-Compensation Committee Processes and Procedures," our Compensation Committee delegated to our CEO the authority, subject to certain limitations such as the maximum value for each award, to grant RSU Awards to certain employees of the Company pursuant to the terms of such policy and our equity incentive plan. As the CEO does not have adopted granting policies or practices that will ensure that we do not time the making of equityauthority under the policy to approve awards to coincide withhis direct reports, awards to executives are subject to approval by our Compensation Committee, or its subcommittee the releaseEquity Award Committee, and in the case of material non-public information.new hires, typically occur in the calendar month following the executive's start date.
The price per share attributable to our equity compensation is determined by the marketclosing price of our common stock. Under our current equity compensation plan, the exercise price of any option to purchase shares of our common stock may not be less than the fair market value of ourTriNet's common stock on the date of grant. If any options are granted, they are granted with an exercise price of at least equal to fair market value of grant.
Short Sales, Hedging and Pledging Policies
We have adopted a policy prohibiting the trading of put or call options or short sales bythat prohibits our employees including(including our executive officers,officers) and members of our Board from holding Company securities in a margin account, pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan, engaging in short sales, transactions in put or call options (or other derivative securities), hedging transactions, or similar inherently speculative transactions with respect to the Company’s stock at any time, regardless of Directors. Wewhether such individual is in possession of material nonpublic information or whether the trading window is open. These transactions often evidence an expectation that the Company’s stock will decline in value and that such directors, officers or employees do not have also adoptedthe same objectives as other Company stockholders. In addition, these transactions may reduce such individuals’ incentive to improve the Company’s performance or otherwise introduce at least the potential for a further policy prohibiting the pledgingconflict of stock by our employees, including the Named Executive Officers, and members of our Board of Directors.interest.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) generally disallows a deduction for federal income tax purposes to any publicly-tradedpublicly traded corporation for any remuneration in excess of $1 million paid in any taxable year to its chief executive officer and each ofcertain "covered employees" with respect the three other most highly-compensated executive officers (other than its chief financial officer). Generally, remunerationyear in excess of $1 million may be deducted if, among other things, it qualifies as “performance-based compensation” withinquestion.
While the meaning of the Code.
The Compensation Committee seeks to qualifyconsiders the incentivetax implications of its decisions when determining the compensation paid to the covered executive officers for the “performance-based compensation” exemption from the deduction limit under Section 162(m) when it believes such action is in the best interests of our Company. However, the Compensation Committeeexecutives, it reserves the discretion, in its judgment, to authorize compensation payments that doare not comply with an exemption from the deduction limitdeductible when it believes that such payments are appropriate to attract and retain executive talent.
Taxation of Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Section 409A of the Code requires that amounts that qualify as “nonqualified deferred compensation” satisfy requirements with respect to the timing of deferral elections, timing of payments, and certain other matters. Generally, the Compensation Committee intends to administer our executive compensation program and design individual compensation components, as well as the compensation plans and arrangements for our employees generally, so that they are either exempt from, or satisfy the requirements of, Section 409A. From time to time, we may be required to amend some of our compensation plans and arrangements to ensure that they are either exempt from, or compliant with, Section 409A.
Taxation of “Parachute” Payments
Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code provide that executive officers and directors who hold significant equity interests and certain other service providers may be subject to significant additional taxes if they receive payments or benefits in connection with a change in control of our Company that exceeds certain prescribed limits, and that our Company (or a successor) may forfeit a deduction on the amounts subject to this additional tax. We are not obligated to provide any Named Executive Officer with a “gross-up” or other reimbursement payment for any tax liability that he may owe as a result of the application of Sections 280G or 4999 in the event of a change in control of our Company.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The Compensation Committee takesmay take accounting considerations into account in designing compensation plans and arrangements for our executive officers and other employees. Chief among these is Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”), the standard which governs the accounting treatment of stock-based compensation awards.
ASC Topic 718 requires us to recognize
Stockholder Support for Our Executive Compensation Program
Our Board has authorized an annual stockholder advisory vote on our NEOs’ compensation as a method for engaging in regular and effective communication with our consolidated statementstockholders. The Compensation Committee considers the results of operations all share-based payments to employees, including grantsthe advisory vote as it reviews and develops our compensation practices and policies. Approximately 99.57% of options to purchase sharesthe votes cast on the stockholder advisory proposal on Named Executive Officer compensation at our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders were voted in favor of our common stock and restricted stock awards for shares of our common stock to our executive officers, based on their fair values.NEO compensation. The application of ASC Topic 718 involves significant amounts of judgment in the determination of inputs into the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model that we use to determine the fair value of stock options. These inputs are based upon assumptions asCompensation Committee did not make any changes to the volatility of the underlying stock, risk free interest rates, and the expected life of the options. As required under GAAP, we review our valuation assumptions at each grant date, and,Company's executive compensation program as a result our valuation assumptions used to value stock options granted in future periods may vary from the valuation assumptions we have used previously. For performance-based stock awards, we also must apply judgment in determining the periods when, and if, the related performance targets become probable of being met.this stockholder advisory vote.
ASC Topic 718 also requires companies to recognize the compensation cost of their share-based payment awards in their income statements over the period that an executive officer is required to render service in exchange for the option or other award (which, generally, will correspond to the award’s vesting schedule).
Compensation Related Risk
Our Board of Directors is responsible for the oversight of our risk profile, including compensation-related risks. TheOur Compensation Committee monitors our compensation policies and practices as applied to our employees (including our executive officers) to ensure that these policies and practices do not encourage excessive and unnecessary risk-taking. In 2015,2020, at the direction of the Compensation
Committee, our management conducted a review of our compensation programs, including our executive compensation program, and, based on this review, determined that the level of risk associated with these programs is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
2015
2020 Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation awarded to or earned by our NEOs in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | | Bonus ($) | Stock
Awards
($)(1) | | Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(2) | | All Other Compensation ($) |
| Total ($) |
| Burton M. Goldfield | 2020 | 937,500 | | — | 6,500,088(6) | | 1,840,000 | | 87,029(7) | | 9,364,617 |
President and Chief Executive Officer | 2019 | 881,250 | | — | 4,000,012 | | 727,341 | | 17,412 | | 5,626,015 |
| 2018 | 808,750 | | — | 4,000,002 | | 1,384,000 | | 26,224 | | 6,218,976 |
Kelly Tuminelli(3) | 2020 | 196,496 | | 1,400,000 | 3,000,065 | | 254,000 | | 2,000(8) | | 4,852,561 |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Olivier Kohler(4) | 2020 | 590,451 | | 500,000 | 4,000,048 | | 683,000 | | 14,374(9) | | 5,787,873 |
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | 2019 | 537,500 | | — | 2,500,100 | | 342,496 | | 417,544 | | 3,797,640 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Samantha Wellington | 2020 | 485,000 | | — | 1,750,088 | | 427,000 | | 16,380(10) | | 2,678,468 |
Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer | 2019 | 430,000 | | — | 500,032 | | 185,942 | | 11,275 | | 1,127,249 |
| 2018 | 270,398 | | — | 1,700,037 | | 150,000 | | 11,000 | | 2,131,435 |
| Edward Griese | 2020 | 411,000 | | — | 850,094 | | 331,000 | | 33,328(11) | | 1,625,422 |
Senior Vice President of Insurance Services | 2019 | 401,250 | | — | 750,018 | | 112,000 | | 11,275 | | 1,274,543 |
| 2018 | 384,500 | | — | 600,076 | | 263,000 | | 18,242 | | 1,265,818 |
| Richard Beckert | 2020 | 228,750 | | — | — | | 291,000 | | 647,798(12) | | 1,167,548 |
Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 2019 | 590,000 | | — | 2,500,100 | | 328,650 | | 11,200 | | 3,429,950 |
| 2018 | 522,500 | | — | 1,100,077 | | 586,000 | | 30,370 | | 2,238,947 |
Michael P. Murphy(5) | 2020 | 418,073 | | 374,000 | 1,000,006 | | — | | 450,259(13) | | 2,242,338 |
Former Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Barrett Boston | 2020 | 430,480 | | — | 1,100,016 | | — | | 490,742(14) | | 2,021,238 |
Former Senior Vice President and Chief Revenue Officer | 2019 | 440,937 | | — | 1,100,084 | | 200,000 | | 19,034 | | 1,760,055 |
| 2018 | 425,000 | | — | 1,050,039 | | 433,000 | | 147,599 | | 2,055,638 |
(1)Amounts reported in this column do not reflect the amounts actually received by our NEOs. Instead, these amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted to our NEOs for the applicable year as computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 and based on the closing price of TriNet's common stock on the date of grant. As required by SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Our NEOs only will realize compensation from these awards to the extent they meet the vesting requirements under the awards. The grant date fair market value of the RSU Awards are as follows: Mr. Goldfield, $3,250,044; Ms. Tuminelli, $3,000,065; Mr. Kohler, $1,500,008 and $1,000,032; Ms. Wellington, $875,044; Mr. Griese, $425,047; Mr. Murphy, $500,003; and Mr.
Boston, $550,008. The grant date fair market value of the PSU Awards based on target performance level are as follows: Mr. Goldfield, $3,250,044; Mr. Kohler, $1,500,008; Ms. Wellington, $875,044; Mr. Griese, $425,047; Mr. Murphy, $500,003; and Mr. Boston, $550,008. Assuming achievement of the performance metrics at the maximum level, the grant date fair market value of the PSU Awards would have been as follows: Mr. Goldfield, $6,500,088; Mr. Kohler, $3,000,016; Ms. Wellington, $1,750,088; Mr. Griese, $850,094; Mr. Murphy, $1,000,006; and Mr. Boston, $1,100,016. For information on the valuation assumptions used in these computations, see Note 1 - Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies found in Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021.
(2)Amounts in this column represent bonuses paid under our 2020 Executive Bonus Plan for performance during the applicable year. Actual payment of these amounts for 2020 occurred in 2021.
(3)Ms. Tuminelli joined the Company on September 8, 2020.
(4)Mr. Kohler's compensation is shown only for 2020 and 2019 because he was not a Named Executive OfficersOfficer in 2015:2018.
(5)Mr. Murphy's compensation is shown only for 2020 because he served as Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company from May 15, 2020 to October 25, 2020, and was not a Named Executive Officer in 2018 or 2019.
(6)Mr. Goldfield’s 2020 equity award, as increased from 2019, was consistent with CEO equity award values for our competitive peer group and was intended to align overall compensation with long-term corporate performance.
(7)This amount represents: $75,193 in payment of accumulated paid time off balance; $11,400 in company 401(k) plan matching contributions; $136 in spousal meals; and a $300 service award.
(8)This amount represents: $2,000 in company 401(k) plan matching contributions.
(9)This amount represents: $11,400 in company 401(k) plan matching contributions; $2,480 in spousal travel; and $494 in spousal meals.
(10)This amount represents: $4,980 in payment of accumulated paid time off balance and $11,400 in company 401(k) plan matching contributions.
(11)This amount represents: $21,928 in payment of accumulated paid time off balance and $11,400 in company 401(k) plan matching contributions.
(12)This amount represents: $11,400 in company 401(k) plan matching contributions; $610,000 in severance pay; $26,323 in COBRA reimbursement; and a $75 service award.
(13)This amount represents: $12,524 in payment of accumulated paid time off balance; $9,546 in company 401(k) plan matching contributions; $425,000 in severance pay; and $3,189 in COBRA reimbursement.
(14)This amount represents: $11,400 in company 401(k) plan matching contributions; $460,000 in severance pay; $19,267 in COBRA reimbursement; and a $75 service award.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name and Principal Position | Year | | Salary
($) | | | Bonus
($)(3) | | Stock
Awards
($)(4) | | Option
Awards
($)(5) | | Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(6) | | All Other
Compensation
($)(7) | | | | Total ($) |
| Burton M. Goldfield | 2015 | | 691,346 |
| | | — |
| | 2,333,351 |
| | 1,164,334 |
| | — |
| | 56,167 |
| | (8) | | 4,245,198 |
|
| President and Chief Executive Officer | 2014 | | 573,077 |
| | | — |
| | — |
| | 1,336,823 |
| | 448,500 |
| | 49,446 |
| | | | 2,407,846 |
|
| | 2013 | | 489,234 |
| | | 93,750 |
| | — |
| | 1,242,600 |
| | 656,250 |
| | 66,604 |
| | | | 2,548,438 |
|
| William Porter | 2015 | | 393,846 |
| | | — |
| | 733,367 |
| | 365,933 |
| | — |
| | 12,161 |
| | (9) | | 1,505,307 |
|
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 2014 | | 347,308 |
| | | — |
| | — |
| | 425,353 |
| | 194,350 |
| | 19,110 |
| | | | 986,121 |
|
| | 2013 | | 340,000 |
| | | 35,250 |
| | — |
| | 310,650 |
| | 329,000 |
| | 21,643 |
| | | | 1,036,543 |
|
| Brady Mickelsen | 2015 | | 187,501 |
| (1) | | — |
| | 1,416,800 |
| | 211,086 |
| | — |
| | 10,591 |
| | (10) | | 1,825,978 |
|
| Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| John Turner | 2015 | | 335,192 |
| | | — |
| | 666,690 |
| | 332,671 |
| | — |
| | 11,991 |
| | (11) | | 1,346,544 |
|
| Senior Vice President, Sales | 2014 | | 285,385 |
| | | — |
| | — |
| | 425,353 |
| | 168,750 |
| | 11,486 |
| | | | 890,974 |
|
| | 2013 | | 250,000 |
| | | 48,750 |
| | — |
| | 124,260 |
| | 326,625 |
| | 12,584 |
| | | | 762,219 |
|
| Gregory L. Hammond | 2015 | | 163,722 |
| (2) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 46,633 |
| | (12) | | 210,355 |
|
| Former Chief Legal Officer and Executive Vice President | 2014 | | 305,962 |
| | | — |
| | — |
| | 425,353 |
| | 130,400 |
| | 32,846 |
| | | | 894,561 |
|
| | 2013 | | 295,000 |
| | | 56,250 |
| | — |
| | 186,390 |
| | 225,000 |
| | 23,323 |
| | | | 785,963 |
|
| |
(1) | Mr. Mickelsen joined us in June 2015. Amounts in this column for Mr. Mickelsen represent his salary from June 2015 through December 2015. |
| |
(2) | Mr. Hammond retired from the Company in June 2015. Amounts in this column for Mr. Hammond represent his salary from January 2015 through his retirement in June 2015. |
| |
(3) | Amounts in this column for our Named Executive Officers represent discretionary bonuses awarded by our compensation committee above the maximum bonus thresholds for Net Service Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA goals and management business objectives (“MBOs”). |
| |
(4) | Amounts reported in this column do not reflect the amounts actually received by our Named Executive Officers. Instead, these amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officers as computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. As required by SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. For 2015, values for PSU are computed based on the probable outcome of the performance condition as of the grant date of the award. For PSU granted in 2015, the maximum possible payout for each Named Executive Officer was 200% of the target value as indicated below. For information on the valuation assumptions used in these computations, see Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. |
| |
a. | Mr. Goldfield: $2,333,333 |
| |
(5) | Amounts reported in this column do not reflect the amounts actually received by our Named Executive Officers. Instead, these amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officers as computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. As required by SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Our Named Executive Officers will only realize compensation to the extent the trading price of our common stock is greater than the exercise price of such stock options. For information on the valuation assumptions used in these computations, see Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. |
| |
(6) | Amounts in this column represent bonuses paid under our Executive Bonus Plan for the applicable year. |
| |
(7) | Amounts in this column include company 401(k) plan matching contributions for each Named Executive Officer of $3,500 in 2015. |
| |
(8) | Amount includes the following payments in 2015: $3,750 in spousal travel, $10,000 in reimbursements for tax preparation and estate planning services, $12,500 in life insurance premiums and $25,570 in tax gross-up payments. |
| |
(9) | Amount includes the following payments in 2015: $4,136 in life insurance premiums and $3,727 in tax gross-up payments. |
| |
(10) | Amount includes the following payments in 2015: $4,050 in reimbursements for tax preparation and estate planning service and $2,344 in tax gross-up payments. |
| |
(11) | Amount includes the following payments in 2015: $2,667 in spousal travel, $997 in life insurance premiums and $4,122 in tax gross-up payments. |
| |
(12) | Amount includes the following payments in 2015: $15,000 in compensation as an Advisor to the Company after his retirement in June 2015, $2,000 in reimbursements for tax preparation and estate planning services, $11,179 in life insurance premiums and $12,393 in tax gross-up payments. |
20152020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
The following table provides information with regard to potential cash bonuses paid or payable to our Named Executive OfficersNEOs in 20152020 under our performance-based, non-equity incentive plan, performance-based, equity incentive plan and with regard to equity awards granted to each Named Executive OfficerNEO under our equity incentive plans during 2015.2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Award Type | Grant Date | | | | | | | | | | All Other Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of Stock or Unit (#) | | Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock and Option
Awards
($)(2) |
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | Cash Incentive | — | | — | 1,425,000 | 2,850,000 | | — | — | — | | — | | — |
| | PSUs | 2/28/2020 | | — | — | — | | 30,742 | 61,484 | 122,968 | | — | | 3,250,044 |
| | RSUs | 2/28/2020 | | — | — | — | | — | — | — | | 61,484 | | 3,250,044 |
| Kelly Tuminelli | | Cash Incentive | | | — | 196,496 | 392,992 | | — | — | — | | — | | — |
| | PSUs | — | | — | — | — | | — | — | — | | — | | — |
| | RSUs | 10/15/2020 | | — | — | — | | — | — | — | | 43,092 | | 3,000,065 |
| Olivier Kohler | | Cash Incentive | — | | — | 596,858 | 1,193,716 | | — | — | — | | — | | — |
| | PSUs | 2/28/2020 | | — | — | — | | 14,189 | 28,377 | 56,754 | | — | | 1,500,008 |
| | RSUs | 2/28/2020 | | — | — | — | | — | — | — | | 28,377 | | 1,500,008 |
| | RSUs | 7/27/2020 | | — | — | — | | — | — | — | | 15,871 | | 1,000,032 |
| Samantha Wellington | | Cash Incentive | | | — | 350,000 | 700,000 | | — | — | — | | — | | — |
| | PSUs | 2/28/2020 | | — | — | — | | 8,277 | 16,554 | 33,108 | | — | | 875,044 |
| | RSUs | 2/28/2020 | | — | — | — | | — | — | — | | 16,554 | | 875,044 |
| Edward Griese | | Cash Incentive | — | | — | 289,100 | 578,200 | | — | — | — | | — | | — |
| | PSUs | 2/28/2020 | | — | — | — | | 4,021 | 8,041 | 16,082 | | — | | 425,047 |
| | RSUs | 2/28/2020 | | — | — | — | | — | — | — | | 8,041 | | 425,047 |
| Richard Beckert | | Cash Incentive | — | | — | 226,000 | 452,000 | | — | — | — | | — | | — |
| | PSUs | — | | — | — | — | | — | — | — | | — | | — |
| | RSUs | — | | — | — | — | | — | — | — | | — | | — |
| Michael P. Murphy | | Cash Incentive | — | | — | 297,500 | 595,000 | | — | — | — | | — | | — |
| | PSUs | 2/28/2020 | | — | — | — | | 4,730 | 9,459 | 18,918 | | — | | 500,003 |
| | RSUs | 2/28/2020 | | — | — | — | | — | — | — | | 9,459 | | 500,003 |
| Barrett Boston | | Cash Incentive | — | | — | 515,000 | 1,030,000 | | — | — | — | | — | | — |
| | PSUs | 2/28/2020 | | — | — | — | | 5,203 | 10,405 | 20,810 | | — | | 550,008 |
| | RSUs | 2/28/2020 | | — | — | — | | — | — | — | | 10,405 | | 550,008 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1)Amounts represent the range of possible cash payouts under our 2020 Executive Bonus Plan. The threshold amount is not applicable as the Compensation Committee has discretion to reduce the non-equity incentive awards to 0%. The maximum amount that could have been earned by each NEO was 200% of the target cash incentive. Amounts for Ms. Tuminelli's bonus target are prorated based on her hire date, and reflect Mr. Kohler's promotion-related salary increase in July 2020. See the section titled "2020 Executive Compensation-Weighting of 2020 Executive Bonus Plan Performance Objectives and
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Grant
Date | | Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | | Possible Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | | All Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares or Units of Stock (#) | | All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Under-lying
Options (#) | | Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards
($/share) | | Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock and Option
Awards
($)(3) |
Threshold ($) | | Target ($) | | Maximum ($) | | Threshold (#) | | Target (#) | | Maximum (#) | | |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 3/4/2015 | | 271,875 |
| | 725,000 |
| | 1,268,750 |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| |
|
| | |
| | | 3/5/2015 | | | | | | | | | | 34,816 |
| | 69,631 |
| | | | | | | | 1,166,667 |
|
| | | 3/5/2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 34,816 |
| | | | n/a |
| | 1,166,684 |
|
| | | 3/5/2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 86,078 |
| | 33.51 |
| | 1,164,334 |
|
| William Porter | | 3/4/2015 | | 112,500 |
| | 300,000 |
| | 525,000 |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| |
|
| | |
| | | 3/5/2015 | | | | | | | | | | 10,943 |
| | 21,885 |
| | | | | | | | 366,667 |
|
| | | 3/5/2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10,943 |
| | | | | | 366,700 |
|
| | | 3/5/2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 27,053 |
| | 33.51 |
| | 365,933 |
|
Brady
Mickelsen | | 6/22/2015 | | 30,404 |
| | 121,616 |
| | 182,425 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 8/21/2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 80,000 |
| | | | n/a |
| | 1,416,800 |
|
| | | 8/21/2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 30,000 |
| | 17.71 |
| | 211,086 |
|
| John Turner | | 3/4/2015 | | 70,000 |
| | 350,000 |
| | 586,250 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 3/5/2015 | | | | | | | | | | 9,948 |
| | 19,895 |
| | | | | | | | 333,333 |
|
| | | 3/5/2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9,948 |
| | | | n/a |
| | 333,357 |
|
| | | 3/5/2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 24,594 |
| | 33.51 |
| | 332,671 |
|
| Gregory L. Hammond | | 3/4/2015 | | 40,000 |
| | 160,000 |
| | 240,000 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(2)Each of the RSUs and PSUs shown in the table were granted under, and is subject to, the terms of the TriNet Group, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan. Amounts reported in this column do not reflect the amounts actually received by our NEOs. Instead, these amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value for the equity awards granted to the NEOs as computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 and based on the closing price of TriNet's common stock on the date of grant. As required by SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The grant date fair value of our 2020 PSU Awards is calculated at the target performance level. At the maximum performance level, the grant date fair value of our 2020 PSU Awards would be 200% of the target value. The material terms of the RSUs and PSUs granted to the Named Executive Officers are described under the section titled "2020 Executive Compensation-2020 Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards" in the CD&A above.
| |
(1) | Amounts represent the range of possible cash payouts under our Executive Bonus Plan. The threshold amount that could have been earned by each Named Executive Officer was 20% to 37.50% of the target bonus under the Executive Bonus Plan. The maximum amount that could have been earned, based on the applicable “Weighting of Cash Bonus Opportunities” as described more on page 27 of this Proxy Statement, was 200% of the target bonus under the Executive Bonus Plan (or 235% for Mr. Turner) based on the Company-wide financial objectives and 100% of the MBO bonus. There was no separate minimum threshold for MBO bonuses and therefore the threshold amounts represents only bonus amounts related to the Company-wide financial objectives. Mr. Mickelsen joined us in June 2015. Amounts in these columns for Mr. Mickelsen represent his Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards from June 2015 through December 2015. |
| |
(2) | Represents PSU awards granted on March 5, 2015. PSU awards were granted for the first time in 2015. 200% maximum potential earned amount tied to full three-year performance period; interim amounts that can be earned are capped at 150%. Payouts above and below the target level are to be scaled on a linear basis. Shares earned above target level with respect to first and second years of performance period to be subject to vesting for remainder of performance period. |
| |
(3) | Amounts reported in this column do not reflect the amounts actually received by our Named Executive Officers. Instead, these amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officers as computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. As required by SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Our Named Executive Officers will only realize compensation to the extent the trading price of our common stock is greater than the exercise price of such stock options. Values for PSU are computed based on the probable outcome of the performance condition as of the grant date of the award. |
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 20152020 Table
The following table provides information regarding outstanding equity awards held by the Named Executive Officersour NEOs as of December 31, 2015.2020.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Grant Date | | | Option Awards | | Stock Awards |
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options (#) | | Option
Exercise
Price ($) | | Option
Expiration
Date | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#) | | | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested ($)(5) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(6) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(5) |
| Exercisable | | Unexercisable | | | | |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 3/6/2012 | (1)(2) | | 13,336 |
| | 6,668 |
| | 0.50 |
| | 3/6/2022 | | 28,288 |
| (3) | | 547,373 |
| 34,816 |
| 673,690 |
|
| | | 3/13/2013 | (1)(2) | | 74,468 |
| | 93,336 |
| | 1.45 |
| | 3/13/2023 | | | | | | | |
| | | 2/11/2014 | (1)(2) | | 91,726 |
| | 119,168 |
| | 10.98 |
| | 2/11/2024 | | | | | | | |
| | | 3/5/2015 | (3) | | 16,139 |
| | 69,939 |
| | 33.51 |
| | 3/5/2025 | | | | | | | |
| William Porter | | 8/23/2010 | (1)(2) | | 11,088 |
| | — |
| | 0.50 |
| | 8/23/2020 | | 8,892 |
| (3) | | 172,060 |
| 10,943 |
| 211,747 |
|
| | | 2/9/2012 | (1)(2) | | 41,668 |
| | 4,168 |
| | 0.50 |
| | 2/9/2022 | | | | | | | |
| | | 3/13/2013 | (1)(2) | | 33,332 |
| | 23,336 |
| | 1.45 |
| | 3/13/2023 | | | | | | | |
| | | 2/11/2014 | (1)(2) | | 32,082 |
| | 37,918 |
| | 10.98 |
| | 2/11/2024 | | | | | | | |
| | | 3/5/2015 | (3) | | 5,072 |
| | 21,981 |
| | 33.51 |
| | 3/5/2025 | | | | | | | |
| Brady Mickelsen | | 8/21/2015 | (4) | | — |
| | 30,000 |
| | 17.71 |
| | 8/21/2025 | | 80,000 |
| (4) | | 1,548,000 |
| | |
| John Turner | | 2/9/2012 | (1)(2) | | 130,792 |
| | 27,500 |
| | 0.50 |
| | 2/9/2022 | | 8,083 |
| (3) | | 156,406 |
| 9,948 |
| 192,494 |
|
| | | 3/13/2013 | (1)(2) | | 11,532 |
| | 9,336 |
| | 1.45 |
| | 3/13/2023 | | | | | | | |
| | | 2/11/2014 | (1)(2) | | 32,082 |
| | 37,918 |
| | 10.98 |
| | 2/11/2024 | | | | | | | |
| | | 3/5/2015 | (3) | | 4,611 |
| | 19,983 |
| | 33.51 |
| | 3/5/2025 | | | | | | | |
| Gregory L. Hammond | | 2/9/2012 | (1)(2) | | — |
| | 3,336 |
| | 0.50 |
| | 2/9/2022 | | | | | | | |
| | | 3/13/2013 | (1)(2) | | — |
| | 14,000 |
| | 1.45 |
| | 3/13/2023 | | | | | | | |
| | | 2/11/2014 | (1)(2) | | — |
| | 37,918 |
| | 10.98 |
| | 2/11/2024 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1)Name | | Grant Date | | Option Awards were granted under our 2009 | | Stock Awards |
| | | | | | Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#) | | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested ($)(8) | | Equity Incentive Plan and are subject to a 4-year vesting schedule, with 25%Awards: Number of the total shares granted vesting upon the 12-month anniversaryUnearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of the date of grant, and 1/48th of the total shares granted vesting each month thereafter. The awards are also subject to accelerated vesting upon certain events, as summarized under “– Potential Payments upon TerminationUnearned Shares, Units or Change in Control.”Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(8) |
| | Option
Exercise
Price ($) | | Option Expiration Date | | | | |
(2)Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) | Pursuant to provisions in our equity incentive plans, the exercise price and number of shares subject to certain of these options were adjusted in connection with special cash distributions of $1.10, $1.57, $5.88 and $0.88 per share of common stock that occurred on July 15, 2011, May 15, 2012, August 30, 2013 and December 26, 2013, respectively. In addition, we effected a 2-for-1 forward stock split in July 2013 and again in March 2014. Accordingly, the share totals and exercise prices shown in the table above (and in the corresponding footnotes) reflect our Named Executive Officers’ post-cash distribution and post-split holdings. |
| | | |
(3)Exercisable | Awards were granted under our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, and are subject to a 4-year vesting schedule, with 1/16th of the total shares granted vesting on the 15th day of the second month of each calendar quarter following the date of grant. The awards are also subject to accelerated vesting upon certain events, as summarized under “– Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” |
| Unexercisable | | | | | |
(4)Burton M. Goldfield | Awards were granted under our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, and are subject to a 4-year vesting schedule, with 25% of the total shares granted vesting on the 12-month anniversary of the date of grant, and thereafter 1/16th of the total shares granted vesting on the 15th day of the second month of each calendar quarter following the grant date. The awards are also subject to accelerated vesting upon certain events, as summarized under “– Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.” | 2/11/2014 | | 130,391(1)(3) | | — | | 10.98 | | 2/11/2024 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | 3/5/2015 | | 86,078(2) | | — | | 33.51 | | 3/5/2025 | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | 3/24/2017 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3,571(5) | | 287,823 | | — | | — |
| | 3/8/2018 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 13,128(5) | | 1,058,117 | | — | | — |
| | 3/18/2019 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 18,222(5) | | 1,468,693 | | — | | — |
| | 2/28/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 49,956(7) | | 4,026,454 | | — | | — |
| | 2/28/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 113,061(9) | | 9,112,717 | | — | | — |
| Kelly Tuminelli | | 10/15/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 43,092(6) | | 3,473,215 | | — | | — |
| Olivier Kohler | | 5/10/2018 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 7,399(4) | | 596,359 | | — | | — |
| | 3/18/2019 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 11,389(5) | | 917,953 | | — | | — |
| | 2/28/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 23,057(7) | | 1,858,394 | | — | | — |
| | 2/28/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 52,182(9) | | 4,205,869 | | — | | — |
| | 7/27/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 13,888(7) | | 1,119,373 | | — | | — |
| Samantha Wellington | | 3/24/2017 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 169(5) | | 13,621 | | — | | — |
| | 3/8/2018 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 1,313(5) | | 105,828 | | — | | — |
| | 12/13/2018 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 17,689(4) | | 1,425,733 | | — | | — |
| | 2/28/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 13,451(7) | | 1,084,151 | | — | | — |
| | 2/28/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 30,441(9) | | 2,453,545 | | — | | — |
| Edward Griese | | 3/24/2017 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 440(5) | | 35,464 | | — | | — |
| | 3/8/2018 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 1,970(5) | | 158,782 | | — | | — |
| | 3/18/2019 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3,417(5) | | 275,410 | | — | | — |
| | 2/28/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 6,534(7) | | 526,640 | | — | | — |
| | 2/28/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 14,786(9) | | 1,191,752 | | — | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5)Richard Beckert | The market value of the unvested shares is calculated by multiplying the number of shares by the NYSE closing price per share of the Company’s common stock of $19.35 on December 31, 2015 (the last trading day of the fiscal year). |
| — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — |
(6)Michael P. Murphy(10) | This columns show unvested PSUs granted in March 5, 2015. The share amount is reported at target payout level. | 3/24/2017 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 279(5) | | 22,487 | | — | | — |
| | 3/8/2018 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 394(5) | | 31,756 | | — | | — |
| | 3/18/2019 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 556(5) | | 44,814 | | — | | — |
| | 2/28/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 1,182(7) | | 95,269 | | — | | — |
Barrett Boston(11) | | 11/14/2017 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 5,326(4) | | 429,276 | | — | | — |
| | 3/8/2018 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 1,312(5) | | 105,747 | | — | | — |
| | 3/18/2019 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 2,227(5) | | 179,496 | | — | | — |
| | 2/28/2020 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 2,602(7) | | 209,721 | | — | | — |
2015(1)Award was granted under our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, and were subject to a four-year vesting schedule, with 1/4th of the total shares granted vesting upon the 12-month anniversary of the award grant date, and 1/48th of the total shares granted (rounded down to the nearest whole share, except for the last vesting installment which will be rounded up or down, as necessary, to account for any prior fractional shares) vesting each month thereafter.
(2)Award was granted under our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, and were subject to a four-year vesting schedule, with 1/16th of the total shares granted (rounded down to the nearest whole share, except for the last vesting installment which will be rounded up or down, as necessary, to account for any prior fractional shares) vesting on the 15th day of the second month of each calendar quarter following the award grant date.
(3)We effected a 2-for-1 forward stock split in March 2014. Accordingly, the share totals and exercise prices shown in the table above reflect Mr. Goldfield's post-split holdings.
(4)Awards were granted under our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, and are subject to a four-year vesting schedule, with 1/4th of the total shares granted vesting upon the 12-month anniversary of the award grant date, and thereafter 1/16th of the total shares granted (rounded down to the nearest whole share, except for the last vesting installment which will be rounded up or down, as necessary, to account for any prior fractional shares) vesting on the 15th day of the second month of each calendar quarter following the award grant date. The awards are also subject to accelerated vesting upon certain events, as summarized under the section below titled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
(5)Awards were granted under our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, and are subject to a four-year vesting schedule, with 1/16th of the total shares subject to the award (rounded down to the nearest whole share, except for the last vesting installment which will be rounded up or down, as necessary, to account for any prior fractional shares) vesting on the 15th day of the second month of each calendar quarter following the award grant date, in each case subject to such NEO's continued service with TriNet through the applicable vesting date. The awards are also subject to accelerated vesting upon certain events, as summarized under the section below titled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
(6)Awards were granted under our 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, and are subject to a four-year vesting schedule, with 1/4th of the total shares granted vesting upon the 12-month anniversary of the award grant date, and thereafter 1/16th of the total shares granted (rounded down to the nearest whole share, except for the last vesting installment which will be rounded up or down, as necessary, to account for any prior fractional shares) vesting on the 15th day of the second month of each calendar quarter following the award grant date. The awards are also subject to accelerated vesting upon certain events, as summarized under the section below titled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
(7)Awards were granted under our 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, and are subject to a four-year vesting schedule, with 1/16th of the total shares subject to the award (rounded down to the nearest whole share, except for the last vesting installment which will be rounded up or down, as necessary, to account for any prior fractional shares) vesting on the 15th day of the second month of each calendar quarter following the award grant date, in each case subject to such NEO's continued service with TriNet through the applicable vesting date. The awards are also subject to accelerated vesting upon certain events, as summarized under the section below titled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
(8)The market value of the unvested shares is calculated by multiplying the number of shares by $80.60, the closing price of TriNet's common stock on December 31, 2020, the last trading day of TriNet's fiscal year.
(9)Amounts in this column set forth unvested PSU Awards granted in 2020. The share amount for the unvested PSUs is reported based on the number of earned but unvested PSUs, i.e. the shares scheduled to vest on December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022.
(10)Mr. Murphy separated employment from the Company on December 28, 2020. Pursuant to his separation agreement, the vesting of the awards set forth for Mr. Murphy were accelerated in January 2021.
(11)Mr. Boston separated employment from the Company on December 7, 2020. Pursuant to his separation agreement, the vesting of the awards set forth for Mr. Boston were accelerated in January 2021.
2020 Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
The following table shows for 20152020 certain information regarding option exercises and stock awards accrued on vesting during 20152020 with respect to our NEOs:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Option Awards | | Stock Awards |
| Name | | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(1) |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | — | | — | | 84,540 | | 6,023,732 |
| Kelly Tuminelli | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| Olivier Kohler | | — | | — | | 40,900 | | 2,990,875 |
| Samantha Wellington | | — | | — | | 19,924 | | 1,250,206 |
| Edward Griese | | — | | — | | 18,630 | | 1,265,866 |
| Richard Beckert | | — | | — | | 19,310 | | 985,574 |
| Michael P. Murphy | | — | | — | | 14,787 | | 829,943 |
| Barrett Boston | | — | | — | | 12,591 | | 790,052 |
(1)Represents the Named Executive Officers:
value realized based on the closing price of TriNet's common stock on the vesting date of such shares multiplied by the number of shares vested. For purposes of TriNet's grant date fair value calculation, we use the closing price of TriNet's common stock on the trading day prior to the vesting date.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Option Awards | | Stock Award |
| Name | | Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#) | | Value Realized
on Exercise
($)(1) | | Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#) | | Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(2) |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 131,306 |
| | 3,027,065 |
| | 6,528 |
| | 146,554 |
|
| William Porter | | 63,916 |
| | 1,062,284 |
| | 2,051 |
| | 46,038 |
|
| Brady Mickelsen | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| John Turner | | 73,344 |
| | 2,308,762 |
| | 1,865 |
| | 41,862 |
|
| Gregory L. Hammond | | 71,500 |
| | 1,237,745 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| |
(1) | Represents the value realized based upon the difference between the fair market value of our common stock or the sale price (for a same-day-sale transaction) on the exercise date less the exercise price of such shares. |
| |
(2) | Represents the value realized based upon the closing stock price of our common stock on the trading day prior to the vesting date of such shares. |
Employment Arrangements
Employment agreements or written offer letters are used from time to time on a case by case basis to attract and/or to retain executives. We currently maintain written employment agreements with all of our current Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Hammond, who retired from the Company in June 2015).NEOs. These arrangementsagreements provide for “at will” employment and set forth the terms and conditions of employment of each Named Executive Officer,NEO, including base salary, annual bonus opportunity, employee benefit plan participation and a recommendation for an equity awards.award. These agreements were each subject to execution of our standard proprietary information and inventions agreement.
Each of our current Named Executive Officers is entitled to certain severance and change of control benefits pursuantPursuant to their employment agreements, each of our current NEOs is entitled to the terms of which areseverance and change in control payments and benefits described below under the heading “– Potential“Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.” In addition, each employment agreement with our Named Executive Officers provides that the Named Executive Officer is eligible to seek reimbursement of up to $15,000 of life insurance premiums annually for supplemental life insurance coverage, and that we will reimburse each Named Executive Officer for financial planning and income tax services, up to a maximum of $10,000 per year. Mr. Hammond is entitled to none of the above benefits as of his retirement in June 2015.
Employment Agreement with Mr. Goldfield
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Goldfield in November 2009, setting forth the terms of Mr. Goldfield’shis employment as our President and Chief Executive Officer.CEO. The employment agreement provides for a base salary subject to annual review and possible adjustment.adjustment and a recommendation to the Board for initial equity awards. Mr. Goldfield is eligible to receive annual performance-based bonusescash incentives determined by our compensation committeeCompensation Committee and based on the achievement of corporate and individual performance goals.
Employment Agreement with Ms. Tuminelli
We entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Tuminelli in August 2020, setting forth the terms of her employment as our Executive Vice President of Finance, effective September 8, 2020, providing for the lump sum payment of a $1,000,000 signing bonus, which was paid on September 30, 2020, and providing for the lump sum payment of $400,000 to assist with relocation expenses, which was paid on October 30, 2020. The employment agreement also refers to the Severance Plan for severance and other payments and benefits following a termination of employment, including in connection with a change in control of TriNet as described below.
Employment Agreement with Mr. PorterKohler
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. PorterKohler in August 2010April 2018, setting forth the terms of Mr. Porter’shis employment as our Senior Vice President, Chief Operations Officer. We subsequently entered into an amended and Chief Financial Officer.restated employment agreement in July 2020, providing for the lump sum payment of a $500,000 promotion-related cash bonus, which was paid on September 15, 2020. The employment agreement providesalso refers to the Severance Plan for base salary subject to annual reviewseverance and possible adjustment. Mr. Porter is eligible to receive annual performance-based bonuses determined by our compensation committeeother payments and based on the achievementbenefits following a termination of corporate and individual performance goals.employment, including in connection with a change in control of TriNet as described below.
Employment Agreement with Mr. MickelsenMs. Wellington
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. MickelsenMs. Wellington in May 2015November 2018, setting forth the terms of Mr. Mickelsen’sher employment as our Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary. The employment agreement providesalso refers to the Severance Plan for base salary subject to annual reviewseverance and possible adjustment. Mr. Mickelsen is eligible to receive annual performance-based bonuses determined by our compensation committeeother payments and based on the achievementbenefits following a termination of corporate and individual performance goals.employment, including in connection with a change in control of TriNet as described below.
Employment Agreement with Mr. TurnerGriese
We entered into an amended employment agreement with Mr. Griese in December 2016, which amended and restated the original agreement we entered into in January 2016, setting forth the terms of his employment as our Senior Vice President of Insurance Services. The employment agreement provides for severance and other payments and benefits following a termination of employment, including in connection with a change in control of TriNet as described below.
Transition Agreement with Mr. Beckert
In February 2020, the Company and Mr. Beckert mutually agreed to the terms of his departure, which constituted a qualifying termination under the terms of the Severance Plan. Mr. Beckert entered into a transition agreement (the “Transition Agreement”), which superseded the terms of the employment agreement that we entered into with him in March 2017, to continue to serve in his capacity as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer to provide for an orderly transition of his duties and responsibilities through the earlier of the commencement of his successor’s
employment with the Company or May 15, 2020 (such earliest date, the “Transition Date”). The Transition Date occurred on May 15, 2020.
Under the Transition Agreement, subject to customary conditions, such as execution of an effective release of claims, Mr. Beckert became entitled to receive the following: (i) a lump sum cash severance payment equal to 12 months of his current base salary, (ii) Company payment of applicable COBRA premiums for a period of up to 12 months; and (iii) accelerated vesting of all unvested equity awards that would have otherwise vested through and including November 15, 2020. In addition, in appreciation of Mr. Beckert’s efforts in connection with the Company’s transition to a new chief financial officer, the Company paid Mr. Beckert a prorated annual cash incentive for 2020.
Employment Agreement with Mr. Murphy
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. TurnerMurphy in March 2012April 2020, which amended and restated the original agreement we entered into with him in April 2016, setting forth the terms of his employment as our Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer, effective no later than May 15, 2020. In addition, such agreement provided for the following potential retention bonus payments: (i) $187,000 in the event Mr. Murphy remained employed by TriNet through the date that occurred 14 calendar days after the filing of TriNet’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal year 2020; (ii) $187,000 in the event Mr. Murphy remained employed by TriNet through the date that occurred 14 calendar days after the filing of TriNet’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of fiscal year 2020; and (iii) $375,000 in the event Mr. Murphy remained employed by TriNet through the date that occurred 14 calendar days after the filing of TriNet’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2020. Mr. Murphy served as our Chief Accounting Officer and continued in that role from May 15, 2020 through October 25, 2020.
Mr. Murphy incurred a qualifying termination under his employment agreement on December 28, 2020 and became entitled to the severance benefits described in the paragraph below. In addition, prior to his separation, he was paid an aggregate of $374,000 in retention bonuses due to his satisfaction of certain retention bonus conditions described above, $187,000 of which was paid on each of August 14, 2020 and November 16, 2020.
Under Mr. Murphy's employment agreement, subject to customary conditions, such as execution of an effective release of claims, Mr. Murphy would become entitled to certain severance pay and other benefits following his termination of employment. Mr. Murphy was not a participant in the Severance Plan. In the event he were to be terminated by TriNet without cause or resign for good reason, he would become entitled to receive the following:
(i) a lump sum cash severance payment equal to 12 months of his current base salary, (ii) Company payment of applicable COBRA premiums for a period of up to 12 months; and (iii) accelerated vesting of all unvested equity awards that would have otherwise vested during the six months following his termination date as if employment had continued through such date (or, if such termination occurred on or within 12 months following a change in control, accelerated vesting in full of all unvested equity awards).
Employment Agreement with Mr. Boston
We entered into an amended employment agreement with Mr. Boston in February 2018, which amended and restated the original agreement we entered into with him in October 2017, setting forth the terms of Mr. Turner’sBoston’s employment as our Senior Vice President Sales. The employment agreement provides for base salary subjectand Chief Revenue Officer.
Mr. Boston separated from us on December 7, 2020. Subject to annual review and possible adjustment.customary conditions, such as execution of an effective release of claims, Mr. Turner is eligibleBoston was entitled to receive annual performance-based bonuses determined by our compensation committeeseverance pay and based onother benefits under the achievement of corporate and individual performance goals.Severance Plan as described below as his separation constituted a qualifying termination under the Severance Plan.
Potential Payments uponUpon Termination or Change in Control
Our NEOs are eligible to receive severance and other payments and benefits following a termination of employment, including in connection with a change in control of TriNet, under their respective employment agreements (for Messrs. Goldfield and Murphy) with the Company, the TriNet Group, Inc. Severance Benefit Plan (for Mr. Griese and previously Mr. Beckert), or the TriNet Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Executive Severance Benefit Plan (for Ms. Tuminelli, Mr. Kohler, Ms. Wellington, and previously Mr. Boston) (together "Severance Plans").
A summary of the terms and conditions of the NEOs' severance benefits under the applicable employment agreement or Severance Plans are set forth below (except as otherwise noted with respect to performance-based equity award agreements, which are applicable to all NEOs). For details of severance benefits under Mr. Beckert’s transition agreement and Mr. Murphy’s employment agreement, please refer to the descriptions included in “Employment Arrangements” above.
Change in Control Termination
If we terminate onethe employment of our Named Executive Officersa participating NEO without cause or if such executive resigns for good reason, and if the termination occurs within the 6-month period (for Mr. Goldfield), 12-month period (for Messrs. Beckert, Griese, and Murphy) or 18-month period (for Ms. Tuminelli, Mr. Kohler, Ms. Wellington, and Mr. Boston) following a change in control of the Company, such executive will be entitled to receive the following benefits in accordance with the Severance Plans, subject to his or her execution of an effective release of claims in our favor:
•Cash Severance. A lump sum cash payment in an amount equal to 12 months (for Mr. Porter, Mr. Mickelsen and Mr. Turner) or 18 months (for Mr. Goldfield) or 12 months (for Ms. Tuminelli, Mr. Kohler, Ms. Wellington, Mr. Griese, Mr. Beckert, Mr. Boston and Mr. Murphy) of histheir then-current monthly base salary;
100%•Bonus. 150% of the actual performance bonuscash incentives earned by Mr. Porter, and 150% of the actual performance bonus earned by Mr. Goldfield in the year prior to such termination;
Accelerated vesting of the portion of the executive’s unvested equity awards that would have vested during the 6 months (for Mr. Mickelsen and Mr. Turner), 12 months (for Mr. Porter) and 18 monthstermination (for Mr. Goldfield) following his termination date, or 100% accelerated vesting of all then-unvested equity awards iftheir target annual bonus for the qualifyingfiscal year during which the termination occurs within the six month period following a change in control of TriNet (for Ms. Tuminelli, Mr. Goldfield,Kohler, Ms. Wellington, Mr. Porter,Griese, Mr. Beckert and Mr. Turner) and twelve month period (for Mr. Mickelsen)Boston);
•COBRA Benefits. Company-paid or reimbursed COBRA premiums for the executive and his covered dependents until the earlier of (i) the end of the 6 months (for Mr. Turner), 12 months (for Mr. Porter, and Mr. Mickelsen) and 18 months (for Mr. Goldfield) or 12 months (for Ms. Tuminelli, Mr. Kohler, Ms. Wellington, Mr. Griese, Mr. Beckert, Mr. Boston and Mr. Murphy) following hissuch executive's termination date, or (ii) such time as hesuch executive qualifies for health insurance benefits through another source;source, or (iii) such time as such executive is no longer eligible for continuation coverage under COBRA and;
•Accelerated Equity Vesting for Time-Based Equity Awards. 100% accelerated vesting of all then-unvested time-based equity awards.
In addition, pursuant to our performance-based equity award agreements, if a change in control occurs prior to the end of the determination date following the applicable performance period, performance criteria will be measured as of the date of the change in control based on actual performance (if capable of measurement) or at target (if not capable of measurement) and will be eligible to vest subject to continued employment. Upon an NEO's qualifying termination on or following a change in control, 100% of the unvested portion of the award that was earned (either in connection with the change in control or at an earlier time) will vest in full.
No Change in Control Termination
If we terminate the employment of an NEO without cause or if such executive electsresigns for good reason, other than due to convert his life insurance or disability insurance coverage into an individual policy, we will pay the premiums for the first 6 monthsa such a termination that occurs within 6-month period (for Mr. Turner)Goldfield), 12 months12-month period (for Messrs. Beckert and Griese), and 18-month period (for Ms. Tuminelli, Mr. PorterKohler, Ms. Wellington, and Mr. Mickelsen)Boston) following a change in control of the Company, such executive will be entitled to receive the following payments and benefits in accordance with the Severance Plans, subject to his or her execution of an effective release of claims in our favor:
•Cash Severance. A lump sum cash payment in an amount equal to 18 months (for Mr. Goldfield) or 12 months (for Ms. Tuminelli, Mr. Kohler, Ms. Wellington, Mr. Griese, Mr. Beckert and Mr. Boston) of their then-current monthly base salary;
•Bonus. 150% of the actual performance cash incentives earned in the year prior to such termination (for Mr. Goldfield);
•COBRA Benefits. Company-paid or reimbursed COBRA premiums for the executive and his covered dependents until the earlier of (i) the end of 18 months (for Mr. Goldfield) or 12 months (for Ms. Tuminelli, Mr. Kohler, Ms. Wellington, Mr. Griese, Mr. Beckert, Mr. Boston and Mr. Murphy) following such executive's termination date, (ii) such time as such executive qualifies for health insurance benefits through another source, or (iii) such time as such executive is no longer eligible for continuation coverage under COBRA; and
•Accelerated Equity Vesting for Time-Based Equity Awards. Accelerated vesting of the portion of the executive’s unvested time-based equity awards that would have vested during the 18 months (for Mr. Goldfield) or 12 months (for Ms. Tuminelli, Mr. Kohler, Ms. Wellington and Mr. Boston) or 6 months (for Messrs. Griese, Beckert, and Murphy) following their termination date as if employment had continued through such date.
For Mr. Goldfield, all outstanding, unvested equity awards are subject to acceleration if such equity award would have vested during the 18-month period following his termination date oras if employment had continued through such earlier date as he ceases to maintain coverage.date.
The amounts in the table below assumesassume that the Named Executive OfficerNEO terminated employment from TriNetthe Company as of December 31, 20152020, and the table sets forth the estimated payments and benefits that each would have received under the Severance Plans. For Messrs. Beckert, Murphy and Boston, the amounts reflect actual payments and benefits earned or received in connection with their employment agreements described above (other than Mr. Hammond, who retiredseparation from the Company in June 2015).2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Change in Control | | No Change in Control |
Cash Severance ($) | | Bonus ($) | | Health
Benefits ($)(1) | | Equity
Acceleration ($)(2) | | Total ($) | | Cash Severance ($) | | Bonus ($) | | Health
Benefits ($)(1) | | Equity
Acceleration ($)(3) | | Total ($) |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 1,425,000 | | 1,091,012 | | 34,030 | | 15,953,958 | | 18,504,000 | | 1,425,000 | | 1,091,012 | | 34,030 | | 4,183,382 | | 6,733,424 |
| Kelly Tuminelli | | 625,000 | | 625,000 | | 11,784 | | 3,473,215 | | 4,734,999 | | 625,000 | | — | | 11,784 | | 1,085,360 | | 1,722,144 |
| Olivier Kohler | | 625,000 | | 625,000 | | 30,027 | | 8,697,987 | | 9,978,014 | | 625,000 | | — | | 30,027 | | 1,776,585 | | 2,431,612 |
| Samantha Wellington | | 500,000 | | 350,000 | | 21,346 | | 5,082,890 | | 5,954,236 | | 500,000 | | — | | 21,346 | | 1,144,681 | | 1,666,027 |
| Edward Griese | | 413,000 | | 289,100 | | 29,011 | | 2,188,096 | | 2,919,207 | | 413,000 | | — | | 29,011 | | 241,155 | | 683,166 |
Richard Beckert(4) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 610,000 | | — | | 39,251 | | 474,833 | | 1,124,084 |
Michael P. Murphy(4) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 420,000 | | — | | 31,703 | | 435,686 | | 887,389 |
Barrett Boston(4) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 460,000 | | — | | 31,103 | | 2,287,104 | | 2,778,207 |
(1)Amount only includes estimated monthly premium for continued health benefits under our existing group health insurance plans. Does not include monthly premiums for individual conversion life insurance or disability insurance policies.
(2)Based on the fair market value of our common stock as of December 31, 2020, which was $80.60 per share. Includes the actual number of shares earned under our 2020 PSUs by our NEOs during the 2020 measurement period with 100% accelerated vesting.
(3)Based on the fair market value of our common stock as of December 31, 2020, which was $80.60 per share.
(4)Amounts reflect actual payments and benefits earned or received in connection with the applicable NEO's separation from the Company in 2020.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Change in Control | | No Change in Control | | |
| Salary | | Bonus | | Health
Benefits(1) | | Equity
Acceleration(2) | | Total | | Salary | | Bonus | | Health
Benefits(1) | | Equity
Acceleration(2) | | Total |
| Burton M. Goldfield | | 1,087,500 |
| | — |
| | 25,733 |
| | 3,341,449 |
| | 4,454,682 |
| | 1,087,500 |
| | — |
| | 25,733 |
| | 2,739,798 |
| | 3,853,031 |
|
| William Porter | | 410,000 |
| | — |
| | 20,442 |
| | 985,773 |
| | 1,416,215 |
| | 410,000 |
| | — |
| | 20,442 |
| | 636,033 |
| | 1,066,475 |
|
| Brady Mickelsen | | 375,000 |
| | — |
| | 23,931 |
| | 1,597,200 |
| | 1,996,131 |
| | 375,000 |
| | — |
| | 23,931 |
| | — |
| | 398,931 |
|
| John Turner | | 350,000 |
| | — |
| | 11,896 |
| | 1,159,292 |
| | 1,521,188 |
| | 350,000 |
| | — |
| | 11,896 |
| | 687,275 |
| | 1,049,171 |
|
2020 Pay Ratio Disclosure
| |
(1) | Amount only includes estimated monthly premium for continued health benefits under our existing group health insurance plans. Does not include monthly premiums for individual conversion life insurance or disability insurance policies. |
| |
(2) | Based on the fair market value of our common stock as of December 31, 2015, which was $19.35 per share. |
Pay Ratio
In accordance with the requirements of Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K (which we collectively refer to as the “Pay Ratio Rule”), we are providing the following information for 2020:
•the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees (except our CEO) was $110,860;
•the annual total compensation of our CEO was $9,384,212; and
•the ratio of these two amounts was 85 to 1. We believe that this ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the requirements of the Pay Ratio Rule.
SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating annual total compensation allow companies to apply various methodologies and apply various assumptions and, as result, the pay ratio reported by us may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by other companies.
Use of Prior Year's Median Employee
For the 2020 pay ratio disclosure, we did not use the same median employee from the prior year although there have been no changes in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we reasonably believe would result in a significant change in the employee compensation arrangements that would significantly impact the identification of the median employee. Using the compensation measure used to select last year’s median employee, we identified a new median employee for 2020 (the "Median Employee"). We selected December 31, 2020 as the date on which to determine the Median Employee.
Determination of Annual Total Compensation of our Median Employee and our CEO
We calculated the Median Employee's annual total compensation for 2020 using the same methodology we used for purposes of determining the annual total compensation of our NEOs for 2020 (as set forth in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table of this Proxy Statement), adjusted to include the cost to the Company in 2020 of specified employee benefits that are provided on a non-discriminatory basis, including group health care coverage and sales referral bonuses.
Our CEO’s annual total compensation for 2020 for purposes of the Pay Ratio Rule is equal to the amount reported in the “Total” column in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement, adjusted in a similar manner as the annual total compensation of our Median Employee. Because group health care coverage was included, our CEO's annual total compensation for 2020 differs from the amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table.
Non-Employee Director Compensation
2015 Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy
In March 2015, the Compensation Committee adopted a newOur non-employee director compensation policy, effective January 1, 2015. This policyadopted by our Compensation Committee in March 2015, as amended, provides that each non-employee director other than Mr. Hodgson, will receive the following cash compensation for board services:
| | | | | | | | |
| Chair ($) | Non-Chair Member ($) |
| Board | | |
| Annual Cash Retainer | 75,000 | | 50,000 | |
| Meeting Fee | 1,500 | | 1,500 | |
Committees(1) | | |
| Audit | | |
| Annual Retainer | 30,000 | | 15,000 | |
| Meeting Fee | 1,000 | | 1,000 | |
| Compensation | | |
| Annual Retainer | 30,000 | | 15,000 | |
| Meeting Fee | 1,000 | | 1,000 | |
| Nominating and Corporate Governance | | |
| Annual Retainer | 15,000 | | 7,500 | |
| Meeting Fee | 500 | | 500 | |
$50,000 per year(1) In March 2021, the Board formed the Risk Committee. Risk Committee members shall receive the same compensation for serviceBoard services as a board member, or $75,000 per year for service as the Chairman of the Board;
$30,000 per year for service as the chair of the Audit Committee or Compensation Committee and $15,000 per year for service as the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee;Committee members.
$15,000 per year for service as a non-chair member of the Audit Committee or Compensation Committee and $7,500 per year for service as a non-chair member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee;
$1,500 for attendance at each Board meeting (whether in person or by telephone); and
$1,000 to committee members for attendance at each meeting of the Audit Committee or Compensation Committee (whether in person or by telephone) and $500 to committee members for attendance at each meeting of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. If the Board meeting and the Committeecommittee meeting are on the same day, only the Board meeting fee is paid.
In addition, in March 2015, withon the adoptiondate of the new director compensation policy, the Committeeour first Board meeting each calendar year, each of our non-employee directors is granted to each existing non-employee director aan RSU awardAward with a grant date fair value of $200,000 (or $300,000, in the case of the Chair of the Board) to be settled in shares of our common stock (or $300,000, in the case of the Chairman of the Board). These awards vested in full on February 12, 2016, subject to the non-employee director’s continuous service through such date. Beginning in 2016, each non-employee director will be granted a RSU award with a grant date fair value of $200,000 to be settled in shares of our common stock (or $300,000, in the case of the Chairman of the Board) at the time of the first Board meeting of each calendar year.stock. These awards will vest in full on the first anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the non-employee director’s continuous service through such date. Starting in calendar year 2021, each such annual RSU Award that is granted will instead vest in full on the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders for the year immediately following the year in which the awards were granted, subject to the non-employee director's continuous service through such date.
In addition, upon his or her initial election or appointment to the Board, each new non-employee director is granted aan RSU awardAward with a grant date value of $200,000 to be settled in shares of our common stock (or $300,000, in the case of a new non-employee director to serve as ChairmanChair of the Board) upon his or her initial election or appointment to the Board,be settled in shares of our common stock, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days that will elapse between the director’s date of initial election or appointment and the first anniversary of thevesting date of grant of the most recent grant of the annual RSU awardsAwards to the non-employee directors and the denominator of which is 365. These awards will vest in full on the first anniversary of thevesting date of the most recent grant of the annual awardsRSU Awards to the non-employee directors, subject to the non-employee director’s continuous service through such date.
In addition, each of the foregoing RSU Awards was eligible to vest in full immediately prior to a change in control, subject to the non-employee director's continuous service the date immediately prior to the change in control.
We also reimburse our non-employee directors for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.
The maximum annual amount of compensation (including cash and equity compensation) for each non-employee director is $750,000 for each of calendar years 2019 through 2024, or if earlier, through the last calendar year not covered by a subsequent stockholder approval of a different maximum annual amount of compensation for non-employee directors. The proposed maximum amount covers all forms of cash, stock and other compensation (other than reimbursements for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings).
2020 Director Compensation Table
The following table shows information regarding the compensation earned or paid during 2020 to non-employee directors who served on the Board during the year. Mr. Goldfield’s compensation is shown in the table entitled “2020 Summary Compensation Table" and the related tables under the section titled “2020 Executive Compensation" in the CD&A. Mr. Goldfield does not receive separateany compensation for his service onas a member of the Board.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | | Stock
Awards
($)(1)(2) | | Total ($) |
| Michael J. Angelakis | | 90,000 | | 200,034 | | 290,034 |
| Katherine August-deWilde | | 94,500 | | 200,034 | | 294,534 |
| Martin Babinec | | 60,500 | | 200,034 | | 260,534 |
| H. Raymond Bingham | | 97,500 | | 200,034 | | 297,534 |
| Paul Chamberlain | | 83,500 | | 200,034 | | 283,534 |
| Maria Contreras-Sweet | | 8,833 | | 69,093 | | 77,926 |
Kenneth Goldman(3) | | 49,790 | | 200,034 | | 249,824 |
| Shawn Guertin | | 75,660 | | 212,142 | | 287,802 |
| David C. Hodgson | | 96,000 | | 300,034 | | 396,034 |
| Jacqueline Kosecoff | | 71,160 | | 212,142 | | 283,302 |
| Wayne B. Lowell | | 98,500 | | 200,034 | | 298,534 |
40
(1)The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earnedamounts reported in this column do not reflect the amounts actually received by or paidour non-employee directors. Instead, these amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the equity awards granted to our non-employee directors during 2015:2020, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. The grant date fair value for the RSU Awards is measured based on the closing price of TriNet’s common stock on the date of grant. The assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 1 - Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies found in Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. The amounts reported exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.
(2)As of December 31, 2020, each non-employee director (other than Mr. Goldman) held outstanding equity awards for the specified number of shares of our common stock: Mr. Angelakis: 5,773 unvested RSUs; Ms. August-deWilde: 5,773 unvested RSUs; Mr. Babinec: 5,773 unvested RSUs; Mr. Bingham: 15,000 outstanding stock options and 5,773 unvested RSUs; Mr. Chamberlain: 5,773 unvested RSUs; Ms. Contreras-Sweet: 921 unvested RSUs; Mr. Guertin: 5,773 unvested RSUs; Mr. Hodgson: 8,659 unvested RSUs; Dr. Kosecoff: 5,773 unvested RSUs; and Mr. Lowell: 20,000 outstanding stock options and 5,773 unvested RSUs.
(3)On August 5, 2020, Mr. Goldman retired from the Board.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($) | | Stock
Awards
($)(2) | | Total
($) |
| Katherine August-deWilde | | 89,000 |
| | 200,032 |
| | 289,032 |
|
| Martin Babinec | | 59,000 |
| | 200,032 |
| | 259,032 |
|
| H. Raymond Bingham | | 129,000 |
| | 300,015 |
| | 429,015 |
|
Paul Chamberlain(1) | | 3,829 |
| | 32,346 |
| | 36,175 |
|
| Kenneth Goldman | | 96,500 |
| | 200,032 |
| | 296,532 |
|
| David C. Hodgson | | — |
| | 200,032 |
| | 200,032 |
|
| John H. Kispert | | 79,000 |
| | 200,032 |
| | 279,032 |
|
| Wayne B. Lowell | | 99,500 |
| | 200,032 |
| | 299,532 |
|
| |
(1) | Mr. Chamberlain was appointed to the Board in December 2015. |
| |
(2) | The amounts reported in this column do not reflect the amounts actually received by our non-employee directors. Instead, these amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the equity awards granted to our non-employee directors during 2015, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. The assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2015. As required by SEC rules, the amounts reported exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. |
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table provides certain information with respect to all of our equity compensation plans in effect as of December 31, 2015.2020. As of December 31, 2020, other than as described below, no equity securities were authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Equity Compensation Plan Information
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Plan Category | | Number of
Securities
To Be Issued
Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants and Rights (#)(a) | | Weighted- average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights ($)(b) | | Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (#)(c) |
| Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders | | 1,941,205(1) | | 15.07(2) | | 6,214,730(3) |
| Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders | | — | | — | | — |
| Total | | 1,941,205 | | 15.07 | | 6,214,730 |
(1)Includes shares of common stock issuable pursuant to equity awards outstanding under our 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, which consists of (a) options to purchase 379,985 shares of common stock, (b) 443,976 shares of common stock underlying unvested RSU Awards and (c) 3,010 shares of common stock underlying unvested PSU Awards. Also includes the number of shares of common stock issuable pursuant to equity awards outstanding under our 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2019 Plan"), which consists of 786,000 shares of common stock underlying unvested RSU Awards and 328,234 shares of common stock underlying unvested PSU Awards.
(2)The weighted-average exercise price is calculated based solely on the exercise prices of the outstanding options and do not reflect the shares that will be issued upon the vesting of outstanding RSU Awards and PSU Awards, each of which have no exercise price.
(3)Includes, under the 2019 Plan, 2,443,417 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance of which 135,605 shares of common stock require re-registration on Form S-8, and, under the 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2014 ESPP”), 3,635,708 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance. The number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2014 ESPP will automatically increase on January 1st each year, starting on January 1, 2015 and continuing through January 1, 2024, by the lesser of (a) 1% of the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on December 31st of the preceding calendar year, (b) 1,800,000 shares of common stock or (c) a number determined by the Board.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Plan Category | | Number of
Securities
To Be Issued
Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options and Stock Awards(1) | | Weighted-
average
Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options | | Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans(2) |
| Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders | | 5,402,836 |
| | $ | 8.96 |
| | 6,267,366 |
|
| Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | | 5,402,836 |
| | $ | 8.96 |
| | 6,267,366 |
|
| |
(1) | Includes shares of common stock issuable pursuant to awards outstanding under our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2000 Plan”) and 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”). Consists of (a) options to purchase 66,000 shares of common stock under the 2000 Plan and 4,380,149 shares of common stock under the 2009 Plan and (b) 956,687 shares of common stock subject to RSU awards under the 2009 Plan. |
| |
(2) | Includes shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the 2009 Plan and our 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2014 ESPP”). The number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2009 Plan will automatically increase on January 1st each year and continuing through January 1, 2019, by the lesser of 4.5% of the total number of shares of the Company’s capital stock outstanding on December 31st of the immediately preceding calendar year, or a number of shares determined by the Board of Directors. The number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2014 ESPP will automatically increase on January 1st each year, starting on January 1, 2015 and continuing through January 1, 2024, by the lesser of (a) 1% of the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on December 31st of the preceding calendar year, (b) 1,800,000 shares of common stock or (c) a number determined by the Board of Directors. |
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
Policies and Procedures for Transactions with Related Persons
We have adopted a policy thatunder which any transaction in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 with any of our executive officers, directors, nominees for election as a director, beneficial owners of more than 5% of any class of our common stock, and any members of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, are not permitted to enter into a related person transaction with us without the prior consent of the Audit Committee. Any request for us to enter into a transaction with an executive officer, director, nominee for election as a director, beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our common stock or any member of the immediate familycertain affiliates of any of the foregoing persons in which the amount involved exceeds $100,000 and such person would have a direct or indirect interest,entities, must be presented to theour Audit Committee for review, consideration and approval or ratification. In approving, ratifying or rejecting any such proposal, theour Audit Committee is allowed to consider the materialall available facts ofand circumstances about the transaction deemed relevant, including, but not limited to, the risks, costs and benefits to the Company, the terms of the transaction and whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction.
Certain Transactions with Related Persons
This section describes transactions since January 1, 20152020 to which we were a party or will be a party, other than compensation arrangements for our directors and executive officers, in which:
•the amounts involved exceeded or willare expected to exceed $120,000; and
•the transaction involved any of our directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of our capitalcommon stock, or any member of the immediate family of or person sharing the household with,any of the foregoing persons, or certain affiliates of any of the foregoing persons or entities, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
All of the transactions described below were presented to the Audit Committee for review and consideration and were approved or ratified by the Audit Committee in accordance with our policy described below.above. We believe the terms of the transactions described below wereare on terms comparable to termsthose we could have obtained in arm’s length dealings with unrelated third parties.
GA TriNet
•Based on information in a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 16, 2021, ArrowMark Colorado Holdings LLC and/or its affiliates (“GA”ArrowMark”) is an owner of more than 5% of the Company’s common stock, which makes GAArrowMark a “Related Person” of the Company under the Company’s Related Person Transaction Policy and Item 404 of Regulation S-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. ArrowMark became a customer of the Company in 2009. In 2020, including certain WSE related pass-through amounts, ArrowMark paid the Company $1,498,647 as a customer of the Company.
•Based on information in a Schedule 13D/A filed on March 17, 2020, AGI-T, L.P., an entity affiliated with Atairos Group, Inc., and/or its affiliates (“Atairos”) is an owner of more than 5% of the Company’s common stock, and one of our directors, Mr. Angelakis, holds an executive position with Atairos, which makes Atairos a “Related Person” of the Company under the Company’s Related Person Transaction Policy and Item 404 of Regulation S-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. Atairos became a customer of the Company in 2017. In 2020, including certain WSE related pass-through amounts, Atairos paid the Company $557,296 as a customer of the Company.
•Based on information in a Schedule 13G filed on February 9, 2021, Cantillon Capital Management LLC and/or its affiliates (“Cantillon”) is an owner of more than 5% of the Company’s common stock, which makes Cantillon a “Related Person” of the Company under the Company’s Related Person Transaction Policy and Item 404 of Regulation S-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. Cantillon became a customer of the Company in 2017. In 2020, including certain WSE related pass-through amounts, Cantillon paid the Company $693,054 as a customer of the Company.
•One of our directors, Mr. Clark, is the Chief Executive Officer of ShotSpotter, Inc. ("ShotSpotter), which makes ShotSpotter a “Related Person” of the Company under the Company’s Related Person Transaction Policy and Item 404 of Regulation S-K. In 2010, GAShotSpotter became a customer of the Company.Company in 2007. In 2015, GA2020, including certain WSE related pass-through amounts, ShotSpotter paid the Company $3,893,253$2,388,285 as a customer of the Company.
•One of our former directors, Mr. Goldman, is the President of Hillspire LLC (“Hillspire”), which made Hillspire a “Related Person” of the Company under the Company’s Related Person Transaction Policy for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. Hillspire became a customer of the Company in 2007. In 2020, including certain WSE related pass-through amounts, Hillspire paid the Company $1,577,148 as a customer of the Company.
We also have entered into indemnity agreements with our directors and executive officers that provide, among other things, that we will indemnify such executive officer or director, under the circumstances and to the extent provided for therein, for expenses, damages, judgments, fines and settlements he or she may be required to pay in actions or proceedings to which he or she is or may be made a party by reason of his or her position as a director, executive officer or other agent of TriNet,the Company, and otherwise to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law and our Bylaws.
HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (e.g., brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for Notices of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or other 20162021 Annual Meeting materials with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or other 20162021 Annual Meeting materials addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.
This year, a number of brokers with account holders who are TriNetthe Company stockholders will be “householding” our proxy materials. A single Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be “householding” communications to your address, “householding” will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in “householding” and would prefer to receive a separate Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, please notify your broker or TriNet.the Company. Direct your written request to TriNet Group, Inc., Attention: Executive Director, Investor Relations, 1100 San Leandro Blvd.,Samantha Wellington, Corporate Secretary, One Park Place, Suite 400, San Leandro,600, Dublin, California 9457794568 or you may reach us by telephone at 510-875-7201.888-874-6388. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the Notices of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials at their addresses and would like to request “householding” of their communications should contact their brokers.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the 20162021 Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Brady MickelsenSamantha Wellington
Secretary
April 15, 201614, 2021
A copy of our Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152020 (including the financial statements and financial statements schedule) is available without charge upon written request to: Samantha Wellington, Corporate Secretary, TriNet Group, Inc., 1100 San Leandro Blvd.,One Park Place, Suite 400, San Leandro,600, Dublin, California 94577.94568.
